Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Criminal Law > Assaults > Flashcards

Assaults Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
Civil Procedure 1L flashcards MBE flashcards MPRE flashcards
1
Q

List the assaults (from least to most severe).

A
  • Assault;
  • Battery;
  • ABH;
  • Malicious wounding or inflicting GBH (s20 GBH);
  • GBH or wounding with intent (s18 GBH)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Of the assaults which two are:

a) Summary only;
b) Either way;
c) Indictable only

A

a) Assault and battery;
b) ABH, maliciously wounding or infecting GBH;
c) wounding or GBH with intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which two assaults are common law assaults?

A

Assault and Battery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define assault.

A

Where the assailant intentionally or recklessly causes the victim to apprehend immediate and unlawful personal force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define apprehension within the meaning of assault.

A

V must expect be aware of the force being threatened (ie they do not have to be fearful).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Can silence constitute assault?

A

Yes - dependant on the facts of the case as a pattern of behaviour would likely be required(eg repeated silent phone calls harassing someone as in R v Ireland and R v Burstow - both victims in these cases suffered psychiatric illness as a result).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Can words constitute an assault?

A

Yes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain immediacy in the AR definition of assault.

A

Reference to the fact the force being apprehended has to be immediate (eg saying I’ll come to your house and punch you next week Is not sufficient as the force would not occur immediately).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Can conditional threats amount to AR of assault?

A

Yes provided the conditional threat satisfies the immediacy requirement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define the two mentality aspects which can satisfy the MR of assault.

A
  • Intention (which is simply whether it is evident they had intent to cause victim to apprehend immediate and unlawful personal force);
  • Recklessness (subjective test, must be clear D foresaw risk and still took the risk).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

True or False: the test for recklessness is subjective.

A

True. Defendant must personally foresee the risk and go on to take it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define battery.

A

Intentionally or recklessly inflicting unlawful force (on the victim).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain how the AR of battery can be present (ie the infliction of unlawful force).

A

The force does not have to be direct (eg hitting someone). It can be also satisfied by:

  • throwing an object at V,
  • putting obstacles in their way to trip over;
  • setting a dog on V.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Does it need to be established the victim suffered harm for the defendant to be guilty of battery?

A

No. There is no requirement for the victim to suffer harm, nor that the defendant had intention (or was reckless to) commit harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Briefly describe MR of battery.

A

Intention or recklessness to inflict unlawful force on another. as with assault the requirement as to recklessness is subjective (ie D must have reasonably foresaw the action would inflict unlawful force).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define ABH (s47 OAPA).

A

D intends to commit (or commits by recklessness) a simple assault or battery which causes (occasions) actual bodily harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define the MR of ABH

A

The MR is the same as that of battery and assault, meaning D only need intend (or recklessly cause) the apprehension or pct of immediate unlawful force against the victim. Whether or not the defendant intends to cause the injury to V is irrelevant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Explain the AR of ABH.

A

The defendant must commit assault or battery which causes actual bodily harm. As such causation (both factual and legal) is needed to satisfy this (ie the assault or battery must be proven to cause the ABH).

18
Q

What does actual bodily harm mean?

A

Actual bodily harm means any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim. the inkiest does not need to be serious or permanent in nature, but must be more than transient or trifling.

19
Q

List some examples of what has constituted actual bodily harm.

A
  • split lip;
  • stabs that require minor stitching;
  • significant bruising to V’s face;
  • swelling to the knee caused by a kick;
  • cutting a substantial piece of V’s hair
20
Q

List some examples of things which have not been found to constitute actual bodily harm.

A
  • Small bruise;
  • minor scratch;
  • red mark on face from slap which quickly fades.
21
Q

Can psychiatric harm constitute actual bodily harm?

A

Yes, but evidence would likely be required from a medical expert (likely a psychiatrist). It has now been widely accepted that the mental harm suffered must be a medically recognised psychiatric condition.

Examples include:
- Anxiety Neurosis; and
- reactive depressioon.

Strong emotions of rage, fear or distress, as well as panic attacks, would not be enough to consist ABHY.

22
Q

Define the overall definition of ABH.

A

Criminal liability for S47 assault (ie ABH), D must cause some harm (ABH) but, it is not necessary to intend or be reckless as to the specific injury suffered. D only need intend or be reckless as to the assault or battery.

23
Q

Give the statuary definition of wounding or inflicting GBH (s20 OAPA).

A

Whoever shall unlawfully and maliciously fund or inflict any grievous bodily harm upon any other person shall be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years.

24
Q

Define AR of s20 GBH.

A

D must unlawfully wound or unlawfully inflict GBH on the victim.

25
Q

Define grievous bodily harm.

A

defined in DPP v Smith as really serious harm. The words are given their ordinary meaning and therefore up to jury/ magistrate if they deem the harm serious enough, taking into account V’s age, health and circumstances.

26
Q

List some examples of GBH.

A
  • fractured skull;
  • severe internal injuries;
  • broken limbs;
  • acid attacks causing disfigurement;
  • really serious psychiatric injury.
27
Q

What is the maximum sentence for:
a) Assault;
b) Battery;
c) s20 GBH;
d) s18 GBH;
e) s47 ABH.

A

a) 6 months;
b) 6 months;
c) 5 years;
d) life;
e) 5 years

28
Q

Define inflicts for purposes of AR of s20 GBH definition.

A

Generally seen as the same as causes (eg god example of a niche Gah was man having sexual intercourse unprotected, without disclosing to the women that he was HIV positive. He was convicted of GBH following both women testing positive for HIV).

29
Q

Define wounding for purposes of AR of s20 GBH.

A

Defined as the breaking of both layers of the skin resulting in bleeding. No reference to the cut being serious so minor wounding is technically sufficient.

(Important to note however that whilst technically a minor cut causing bleeding could constitute wounding, in practice it is unlikely a s20 charge would be seen as appropriate for such a minor injury).

30
Q

List some examples of wounding for purposes of AR of s20.

A
  • cut of any size;
  • scratch that draws blood;
  • cuts to the inside of the mouth.
31
Q

List examples of things which have been found not to constitute wounding for s20 GBH.

A
  • bruising or internal bleeding;
  • a rupture of the blood vessels in the eye.
32
Q

Explain the MR of s20 GBH.

A

Definition of s20 uses the word maliciously (wounding or inflicting GBH). Courts have decided that D must only intend (or be reckless to) cause some bodily harm. effectively they must intend or be reckless to cause ABH. It is not necessary that they foresee the severity of harm that is actually inflicted.

33
Q

Define the AR of s18 GBH

A

Identical to the AR for s20, D but wound or cause/ inflict GBH.

34
Q

Define MR of s18 GBH.

A

Either:

a) intent to cause GBH; or
b) intent to resist or prevent lawful apprehension or detention of any person coupled with the intention or recklessness as to causing some bodily harm.

35
Q

Explain the first way one could satisfy the MR for s18 GBH (intent to cause GBH).

A

D will be charged if they intend. to cause GBH. intent to cause lesser harm will not suffice, and the MR cannot be satisfied by recklessness.

36
Q

List some factor which may lead a jury to think intent to cause GBH was apparent.

A
  • premeditation of the attack;
  • repeatedly stabbing or punching the victim;
  • use of a weapon.
37
Q

Explain the second requirement which can satisfy the MR of s18 GBH (intention to resist or prevent arrest).

A

D must intend to resist or prevent an arrest and intend (or be reckless to intend) some actual bodily harm.

eg hitting a police officer trying to arrest you, you hitting them scratches their face drawing blood. While your intention is not to cause GBH, you have intended/ been reckless to cause ABH and also intended to prevent arrest. as such you would have sufficient MR for s18.

38
Q

What is the general rule regarding consent to statutory assaults (ie not including common law offences of assault and battery).

A

General rule is that consent cannot be a defence to statutory assaults where harm is intended or caused.

39
Q

List the executions to the fa t that consent is not a defence to statuary assaults.

A
  • Surgery;
  • Dangerous exhibitions such as circus acts;
  • Sport (provided it is properly conducted) - it is accepted that in sport serious harm may be caused however this is not a blanket defence and the facts are vital;
  • ear piercing and tattoos.
  • Horseplay - ie playing between youngsters (although facts will be important and judicial discretion will be crucial dependant on the context).
40
Q

Give two examples which were not found to be exceptions to the general rule about consent to statuary assaults.

A
  • Sado-masochism; and
  • Severe body modifications (eg division of a tongue or removal of a nipple).
41
Q

What may override an expiation to the general rule about consent?

A
  • Consent is NOT valid where it is obtained by fraud as to the identity of D, or the nature and quality of the act;
  • Consent is only valid if it is freely given by fully informed and competent adult (ie this protects minors ad those suffering from disabilities etc).
42
Q

Summarise the position as to consent to assaults (both common law and statutory).

A
  • consent must be valid;
  • consent is implied in relation to simple or physical assault provided no harm is intended or cause (eg handshakes);
  • consent is not a defence to s47,s20 or s18 offences unless the behaviour coms within one of the valid exactions and is obtained validly (ie not through fraud or by someone who does not understand due to age or learning difficulties).

Criminal Law (12 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions