Assault Flashcards

1
Q

What is the A/R for assault under S.39 CJA 1988?

A

Any act which causes (V) to apprehend the infliction of immediate and unlawful force

Ireland and Burstow.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the M/R for assault under S.39 CJA 1988?

A

Intention or recklessness as to causing (V) to apprehend the infliction of immediate and unlawful force

Savage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What constitutes an ‘act’ in the context of assault?

A

Can be an act or words

Words alone can also constitute an assault as shown in Ireland and Burstow.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Can letters be considered an act of assault?

A

Yes, as established in the case of Constanza

Letters can convey threats that lead to apprehension of force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does ‘silence’ represent in terms of assault?

A

Silence can be considered an act of assault

This is supported by the case of Ireland.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Can words negate an assault?

A

Yes, as shown in Tuberville v Savage

However, this may vary based on circumstances, as seen in R v. Light.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is meant by ‘causes’ in the context of assault?

A

Factual (White) and legal causation (Smith)

Both types of causation are necessary to establish assault.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does ‘apprehend’ mean in the context of assault?

A

‘Apprehend’ means ‘anticipate’ or ‘expect’

If (V) does not apprehend force, there is no assault, as in R v. Lamb.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

True or False: If V does not apprehend force, it constitutes assault.

A

False

As established in R v. Lamb.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

‘Immediate’ has been interpreted by the courts to mean _______.

A

‘imminent’ - liable to happen soon.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

In Constanza, ‘immediate’ is defined as _______.

A

‘at some time not excluding the immediate future.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

‘Unlawful’ generally indicates a lack of _______.

A

consent to the feared violence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In Collins v. Wilcock, what is sufficient for ‘force’?

A

The slightest touching is sufficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Assault Summary template

A

1 - Assault s39 CJA 1988
2 - AR - any act that causes V to apprehend the infliction of immediate and unlawful force (Ireland;Burstow)
3 - CAUSATION - factual and legal and intervening acts
4 - MR - Intention or recklessness as to AR…….APPLY
5 - Max sentence 6 months imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Assault A01 Template Full

A

With regard to ______ it is likely that D will be charged with assault under s39 CJA 1988.

The AR for assault is any act which causes V to apprehend the infliction of immediate and unlawful force (Ireland;Burstow). Act can mean an act, words, letter (Constanza) or silence (Ireland). Words alone can amount to an assault - ‘a thing said is a thing done’ (Ireland;Burstow). Apprehend means anticipate or expect, and if V doesn’t apprehend, there is no assault (Lamb). Finally, immediate means imminent or not liable to happen at some time not excluding the immediate future (Constanza), and unlawful means with no lawful excuse.

Causation - factual (White) Legal (Cheshire) - chin of causation?

The MR of assault is intention or recklessness as to AR - intention means aim, purpose or objective and recklessness in conscious risk taking - APPLY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly