Asch's Research Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the aim of Sheif study? (1935)

A

Conducted a lab experiment with the aim of demonstrating that people conform to group norms when they are put in an ambiguous (unclear) situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the method of Sherif’s study?

A
  • A lab experiment
  • He used the autokinetic effect - small spots of light projected onto a screen and dark room will appear to move - the visual illusion
  • Participants individually tested on their estimates on how far the light moved varied considerably (tested in a group of three)
  • Manipulated by putting two people whos estimate was similar and one person estimate different
  • Had to say aloud on how they thought the light moved
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the result of Sherrif’s study?

A

Sherrif found that over numerous estimates (trials) of the movement of light,

group converged to a common estimate

A person whose estimate the movement was greatly different from the other two in the group confirmed to the view of the other two

Sherrif said that this showed that people would always tend to conform. Rather than make an individual judgement they tend to come to a group agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What type of conformity in this Sherrif’s study is a result of NSI or ISI?

A

NSI

Participants follow to fit in as they come to a group agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is Sherrif’s study used?

A

As an evaluation

NOT A REQUIRED STUDY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the aim of Asch’s study?

A

Solomon Asch conducted an experiment to investigate the extent to which social pressure form a majority group could affect a person to conform

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the procedure of Asch’s study?

A
  • Used a lab experiment to study conformity
  • Used a line judgement task
  • Put naiive participant in a room with seven confederates
  • Confederates had to agree in advance what their responses would be when presented with line task
  • The real participants did not know and this would lead to believe the other seven participants were real
  • Each person had to say their answers aloud which comparison line more like the target line
  • Real participant sat at the end and gave answer last
  • In some trials , seven confederates asked to give wrong answer
  • 18 trials in total , confederates gave 12 wrong answers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the results of Asch’s study?

A

Asch measured the number of times each participant conformed to the majority view

On average, about one third (32%) of the participants in each trial went along and conformed to the clearly incorrect majority.

Three-quarters of the participants (75%) confirmed on at least one trial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the conclusion of Asch’s study?

Why did the participants conform so readily?

A

When they were interviewed after the experiment,

most of them said that they did not really believe their conforming answers, but had gone along with the group for the fear of being ridiculed or thought ‘peculiar; - NSI

A few said that they really did believe the group’s answers were correct - ISI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the variations of Asch’s original procedure?

A
  1. Group size
  2. The unanimity of the majority
  3. Difficult of the task
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain the Asch’s variation of original procedure

GROUP SIZE

A
  • The number of confederates varied between 1 and 15
  • Found little conformity when majority consisted of one to two confederates
  • Presence of three confederates, proportion of confirming responses jumped about 30%
  • Increases size of the majority did not increase conformity
  • Indicating size of majority is important to a certain point
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain the Asch’s variation of the original procedure

UNANIMITY OF THE MAJORITY

A

The presence of dissenting confederates reduced conformity

whether the dissent was giving right or wrong answer

The average figure is 25% wrong answers

Having a dissenter enabled a naiive participant to behave more independently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain the Asch’s variation of the original procedure

DIFFICULTY OF TASK

A

Asch made the line-judging task harder by making the stimulus line and comparison lines more similar in length

Conformity increased when the task was more difficult

Informational social influence plays a greater role when the task becomes harder

The situation is more ambiguous so we are more likely to look to others for guidance and assume they are right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the conclusion of Sherrif’s study?

A

Results show that when in an ambiguous situation (such as autokinetic effect)

a person will look to others (who know more/better) for guidance (i.e. adopt the group norm)

They want to do the right thing but may lack the appropriate information

Observing others can provide this information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Limitation of Asch’s findings may be a ‘child of the times’

A
  • Permin and Spencer (1980) found just one conforming response in 396 trials.
  • Participants (UK Engineering students) felt more confident measuring lines than Asch’s original sample, so were less conformist
  • Also , 1950s were a conformist time in America and people might be less likely to conform in subsequent decades.
  • The Asch effect is not consistent over time , not an enduring feature of human behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A second limitation of Asch’s study

Situation and task was artificial

A
  • Participants knew they were in a study so may have to just respond to demand characteristics
  • The line task was trivial so there is no reason to conform. Also, the naiive participants were in a group but not like the groups found in everyday life.
  • Findings do not generalise to everyday situations where the consequences of conformity are important. and where we interact with groups more directly
17
Q

A third limitation of Asch’s study

findings only apply to certain groups

A
  • Only men were tested by Asch. Neeto (1995) suggested women might be more conformist, probably because they are more concerned about social relationships (and being accepted).
  • Participants from the USA (individualist culture) - they are more concerned with themselves than their social group. Smith and Bond suggest that conformity rates are higher in collective cultures (China) that are more concerned with group needs
  • Suggests that conformity levels are sometimes even higher than Asch found.
  • This finding limited to American men
18
Q

A fourth limitation of Asch’s study

Ethical issues associated with this

A
  • Naiive participants were deceived. They thought the others in the procedure (confederates) were genuine - violated informed consent
  • But the ethical cost should be weighed against the benefits of the study
  • Main benefit is highlighting people’s susceptibility to group conformity and the variables affecting it
19
Q

Discuss research into conformity

A
  • AO1 - Asch/Sherrif
  • AO3 - Studies
20
Q

Discuss and evaulate explanations of conformity

A
  • NSI
  • ISI
  • Examples
  • Evaulation
21
Q

Discuss variables affecting conformity

A
  • Asch
    • Group Size
    • Unaminity of majority
    • Task Difficulty
    • EVAULATION ASH