AS Level Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Operationalised hypothesis

A

Clearly defined and measurable statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Directional hypothesis

A

States whether changes are greater or lesser, positive or negative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Non-directional hypothesis

A

Doesn’t state the direction, just that there’s a difference or correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When is a non-directional hypothesis used?

A

When there’s no theory or previous research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Research issues: Extraneous Variables

A

Are nuisance variables that have the potential to affect the results and may make it difficult to detect an effect.
A researcher may control these

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

:Research Issues: Confounding variables

A

Change systematically with the IV so we can’t be sure if any observed change in the DV is due to the CV or IV.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Research Issues: Demand characteristics

A

Any cue from the researcher or research situation that may reveal the aim of the study and change participants’ behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Research issues: Investigator effects

A

Any effect if the investigator’s behaviour on the outcome of the research (the DV) and also on design decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Research issues: Randomisation

A

The use of chance when designing investigations to control for the effects of bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Research issues: Standardisation

A

Using the same formalised procedures for all participants in a research study.
Differences become EVs otherwise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Pilot studies & more: Pilot Studies

A

Small scale trial run of an investigation to pre-test procedures so that research design can be modified if required
Pilot studies aren’t restricted just to experimental studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Pilot studies & more: Single Blind Procedure

A

Participants don’t know the aims of the study so demand characteristics are reduced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Pilot studies & more: Double-blind procedure

A

Both the participant and the researcher don’t know the aims of the study to reduce demand characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Pilot studies & more: Control groups and conditions

A

Control groups (independent measures) or control conditions (repeated measures) are used to set up a comparison.
They act as a baseline and help establish causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Experimental designs: independent groups

A

One group does condition A and a second group does condition B.
Participants should be randomly allocated to experimental groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Independent groups: Positives + explanations

A

-No order effects: participants are only tested once so can’t practise or become bored/tired. This controls an important CV
-Won’t guess the aim: participants are only tested once so are unlikely to guess the aims. Therefore, behaviour may be more natural (higher realism)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Independent groups: Negatives + Explanations

A

-Participant Variables: the participants in the two groups are different, acting as the EV/CV. This may reduce the validity of the study
-Less Economical: need twice as many participants as repeated measures for the same data. This means more time is spent recruiting which is expensive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Experimental designs: Repeated Measures

A

Same participants take part in all conditions of an experiment. The order of conditions should be counterbalanced to avoid order effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Repeated Measures: Positives + Explanations

A

-Participant variables: the person in both conditions has the same characteristics. This controls an important CV
-Fewer Participants: half the number of participants is needed than in independent groups. This means less time is spent recruiting participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Repeated measures: Negatives + explanations

A

-Order effects are a problem: participants may do better or worse when doing a similar taste twice and there are also practice/fatigue effects. This reduces the validity of results
-Participants guess aims: participants may change their behaviour which may reduce the validity of results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Experimental designs: Matched pairs

A

Two groups of participants are used but they’re also related to each other by being paired on participant variables that matter for the experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Matched pairs: Positives + Explanations

A

-Participant variables: participants matched on a variable that’s relevant to the experiment. This controls participant variables and enhances the validity of the results
-No order effects: participants are only tested once so no practice or fatigue effects which also enhances the validity of results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Matched Pairs: Negatives + Explanations

A

-Matching isn’t perfect: Matching is time consuming and can’t control all relevant variables meaning not all participant variables can be addressed
-More participants: Need twice as many participants as repeated measures for the same data. This means more time is spent recruiting which is expensive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Types of experiment: Lab Experiment

A

A controlled environment where extraneous and confounding variables can be regulated. Participants go to the researcher. The independent variable is manipulated by the researcher and effect on the dependent variable is recorded.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Lab experiment: Positives + Explanations

A

-EVs+CVs can be controlled: this means that the effect of the EVs and CVs on the DV can be minimised. Cause-and-effect between the IV and DV can be demonstrated (high internal validity).
-Can be more easily replicated: greater control means less chance that new EVs are introduced. This means that findings can be confirmed, supporting their validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Lab Experiment: Negatives + Explanations

A

-May lack generalisability: the controlled lab environment may be artificial and participants are aware they’re being studied. Behaviour may not be natural and can’t be generalised to every day life, which means there is no external validity.
-Demand characteristics: cues in the experimental situation that invite a particular response from participants. The findings may be explained by these keys, rather than the effect of the IV (lower internal validity).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Types of experiment: Field Experiment

A

A natural setting. The IV is manipulated and the effect on the DV is recorded

28
Q

Field Experiment: Positives + Explanations

A

-More natural environment: participants are more comfortable and behaviour is more authentic. results may be generalisable to everyday life
-Participants are unaware of being studied: they’re more likely to behave as they normally do so the findings can be generalised. it’s more difficult to establish cause and effect than in a lab.
-There are ethical issues: participants in a field experiment may not have given informed consent. this is an invasion of participants’ privacy

29
Q

Types of Experiment: Natural Experiment

A

The experimenter doesn’t manipulate the IV - it does change but the change isn’t made by the experimenter (something else cause the IV to change). DV may be naturally occurring or may be devised by the experimenter and measured in the field or lab.

30
Q

Natural Experiment: Positives + Explanations

A

-May be the only practical/ethical option: it may be unethical to manipulate the IV. A natural experiment may be the only way causal research can be done for topics
-Greater external validity: natural experiments involve real-world issues. this means that findings are more relevant to real experiences

31
Q

Natural Experiment: Negatives + Explanations

A

-The natural event may only occur rarely: natural events occur rarely which reduces the opportunity for research. this may limit the scope for generalising findings.
-Participants not randomly allocated: experimenter has no control over which participants are placed in which condition (IV is pre-existing). this means the CV may not be controlled

32
Q

Types of Experiment: Quasi-Experiment

A

IV is based on a pre-existing difference between people (e.g. age or gender). No one has manipulated this variable, it just exists. The DV may be naturally occurring or may be devised by the experimenter + measured in field/lab

33
Q

Quasi-Experiment: Positives + Negatives

A

-Often High Control: often carried out under controlled conditions (like lab). this means replication is possible
-Comparisons can be made between people: IV is a difference between people in this experiment. this means that comparisons between different types of people can be made.

34
Q

Quasi-Experiment: Negatives + Explanations

A

-Participants aren’t randomly allocated: experimenter has no control over which participants are placed in which condition (IV is pre-existing). Participant Variables may have caused the change in the DV acting as a CV
-Causal relationships not demonstrated: researcher doesn’t manipulate/control the IV (like natural ex.). this means we can’t say for certain that any change in the DV was due to the IV.

35
Q

Sampling: Population

A

The large group of people that a researcher is interested in studying

36
Q

Sampling: Sample

A

A smaller group selected from the target population

37
Q

Sampling: Bias

A

Most samples are biased in that certain groups may be over or under represented

38
Q

Random sampling

A

Equal chance. Every person in the target population has an equal chance of being selected.

39
Q

How is random sampling carried out

A

Lottery method

40
Q

Positive of random sampling

A

EVs/CVS are controlled which enhances internal validity

41
Q

Negative of random sampling

A

Time consuming and may not work. A complete list of the target population is hard to get and some participants may refuse to participate

42
Q

Systematic sampling

A

Using a set system. Participants are chosen using a set pattern (sampling frame)

43
Q

How is systematic sampling carried out?

A

Every nth person is selected from a list of the target population

44
Q

A positive of systematic sampling

A

It is unbiased. The first item is usually selected at random as there’s an objective method

45
Q

A negative about systematic sampling

A

Takes time and effort. A complete list of the target population is required so you may as well use random sampling

46
Q

Stratified sample

A

Strata. Sample reflects proportions of people is certain subgroups (strata) within a population.

47
Q

How is stratified sample carried out?

A

Subgroups (strata’s) are identified. The relative percentages of the subgroups in the population are reflected in the sample.

48
Q

A positive of stratified sample

A

It’s a representative method. The characteristics of the target population are represented. Generalisability is more likely than other methods.

49
Q

A negative of stratified sample

A

Stratification isn’t perfect because strata can’t reflect all the ways in which people are different meaning complete representation isn’t possible.

50
Q

Opportunity sample

A

Most available. People who are simply most available

51
Q

How is opportunity sample carried out?

A

Asking people nearby

52
Q

A positive of opportunity sample

A

Quick method. Opportunity sampling is convenient because you just make use of the people who are closest. Makes it cheaper and one of the most popular sampling method

53
Q

A negative of opportunity sampling

A

Inevitably biased. The sample is unrepresentative of the target population as it’s drawn from a very specific area. This means that findings can’t be generalised

54
Q

Volunteer sample

A

Self selecting. Participants select themselves

55
Q

How is volunteer sample carried out

A

Advertising

56
Q

A positive of volunteer sampling

A

Participants are willing. Participants have selected themselves and know how much time and effort is involved.p meaning they’re likely to engage more than people stopped in the street

57
Q

Negative of volunteer sampling

A

Volunteer bias. Participants may share certain traits meaning findings can’t be generalised

58
Q

Ethical issues

A
  • When a conflict exists between the rights of participants and aims of the research.
    -BPS codes of conduct is a quasi-legal document to protect participants based on four principles: respect, competence, responsibility, and integrity.
  • ethics, committees way up costs (for example potential harm) and benefits (for example, value of research) before deciding whether a study should go ahead.
59
Q

Informed consent

A

Informed consent involves making participants aware of the aims of the research, the procedures, their rights (including the right to withdraw partway through the investigation should they so wish), and also what their data will be used for.
Participants should then make an informed judgement whether or not to take part without being coerced or feeling obliged.
May reveal aims

60
Q

Ways of dealing with informed consent

A

Signed consent form, where appropriate seek parental consent

61
Q

What are the three alternative ways of getting informed consent?

A
  • Presumptive: ask a similar group if the study is acceptable
  • Prior general: agree to be deceived -> achieved by participants agree to take part in many different studies
  • Retrospective: get consent after the study
62
Q

Deception

A

deliberately misleading or withholding information from participants at any stage of the investigation so consent isn’t informed
Despite that, there are occasions when deception can be justified if it does not cause the participant undue distress.

63
Q

How to resolve deception

A

-At the end of a study, participants should be given a full debrief.
-participants should be made aware of the true aims of the investigation and any details they were not supplied with during the study, such as the existence of other groups or experimental conditions.
-Participants should also be told what their data will be used for and must be given the right to withhold data if they wish.
-This is particularly important if retrospective consent is a feature of the study (see right).

64
Q

Protection from harm

A
  • As a result of their involvement, participants should not be placed at any more risk than they would be in their daily lives, and should be protected from physical and psychological harm.
  • The latter includes being made to feel embarrassed, inadequate or being placed under undue stress or pressure.
65
Q

How to resolve protection from harm

A
  • participants should be given the right to withdraw at each stage of the research process
  • should be reassure that their behaviour was normal/typical during the debriefing
  • researcher should provide counselling if participants have been distressed
66
Q

Privacy and confidentiality

A
  • Participants have the right to control information about themselves.
  • This is the right of privacy. If this is invaded then confidentiality should be protected.
  • Confidentiality refers to our right, enshrined in law under the Data Protection Act, to have any personal data protected.
  • The right to privacy extends to the area where the study took place such that institutions or geographical locations are not named.