Artificial Intelligence Flashcards
May 2016 crash
First person killed - travelling in auto-pilot mode
- Tesla did not assume responsibility
March 2018
First pedestrian killed
Giuseppe Contissa
Self-driving cars should be equipped with an ‘ethical knob’
Jan Gogoll
Everyone’s cars should have the same ethical settings
Advantage of giving people a degree of choice for moral settings?
Can hold them responsible for the outcomes more easily
Utilitarian ethics
Maximising overall happiness
Kantian ethics
Applying a basic set of principles to serve as universal laws
Virtue ethics
Fully realising a basic set of virtues
Contractualistic ethics
Formulating guidelines people would be willing to adopt
Gurney’s theory
Computer equipped to make utilitarian calculations might take into account that people prefer to drive in cars that save themselves, so therefore if more people use cars –> overall # deaths decrease –> overall maximum happiness
Hevelke and Nida Rumelin - what to do since it’s unfair to hold drivers responsible
Unfair to hold drivers responsible
- Unfair moral luck
- Should instead hold users collectively responsible for the risks they introduce as a group into society (NB retribution gap)
Can agency be transferred to a car?
Mindell: Always supervised by humans to some degree
- Can’t act on beliefs and desires
‘Mixed traffic argument’
People have a duty to switch to the safer alternative, or use added safety precautions e.g. speed limiters and alcohol locks
NZ car regulations (2)
LTA s 22: Driver must stop and give assistance
Land Transport Rule: Drivers must not exceed speed limits
- Also offences such as ‘operate’
What is AI? (Michael Scherer)
Machines that are capable of performing tasks that, if performed by a human, would be said to require intelligence
Four categories of AI
Thinking humanely, acting humanely, thinking rationally, acting rationally
Problem with autonomy
Reduces human labour
- Forces disruptive changes to the law and legal system
Problem with foreseeability
Can’t predict the future
Machine-learning
Humans bound by cognitive limitations - can’t see all the options in time constraint so settle for satisfactory option
- Might not be able to hold designers liable if they didn’t predict the actions
Research and development
Discreetness: can be conducted with limited visible infrastructure
Diffuseness: can work on it from multiple locations
Discreteness: can design without coordination/replicate code
Opacity: inner workers may be secret
+ low cost
How to solve discreteness and opacity?
Apportion liability and demand publication of the code
How to solve diffuseness and discreetness?
More difficult.
- Likely to be large visible corporations so not a huge worry but could be a problem in the future
Why should a legislature influence policy?
Democratic, freedom, resources; but
Lack of expertise and limited time
Why should an agency influence policy?
Tailor-made to a specific problem, flexible, specialised, ex-ante; but
Legislatures scared to give agencies too much freedom + who is an AI expert?
Why should the courts influence policy?
Reactive, and focus on the facts; but
Common law moves slowly and they don’t focus on broad social considerations