Article IV Relevance and Its Limits Flashcards
RULE 401: Test for Relevant Evidence
Evidence is relevant if:(a) That evidence has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; AND evidence can have slight probative wortth(b) The fact is of consequence in determining the action.
RULE 402: General Admissibility of Relevant Evidence
Relevant evidence is admissible unless the following provides otherwise: the United States Constitution a federal statute these rules; OR other rules prescribed by the Supreme CourtIrrelevant evidence is not admissible.
RULE 403: Excluding Relevant Evidence
The court may exclude relevant evidence if:a.) If its probative value is substantially outweighed by - Unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence
RULE 404: Character Evidence; Crimes or Other Acts
(A) Character Evidence:(1) Prohibited Uses. Evidence of a person’s character or character trait is not admissible to prove that on a particular occasion the person acted in accordance with the character or trait.(2) Exceptions for a Defendant or Victim in a Criminal Case. defendant may offer evidence of a pertinent trait - prosecutor may rebut defendant may offer of an alleged victims pertinent trait - prosecutor may rebut prosecutor may offer evidence of the alleged victim’s trait of peacefulness against a showing of being the aggressor(3) Exceptions for a Witness. Evidence of a witness’s charatcer may be admitted under Rules 607, 608, and 609.
RULE 404: Character Evidence; Crimes or Other Acts continued…
(B) Crimes, Wrongs, or Other Acts:(1) Prohibited Uses. Evidence of a crime, wrong, or other act is not admissible to prove a person’s character in order to show that on a particular occasion the person acted in accordance with the character.(2) Permitted Uses; Notice in a Criminal Case. This evidence may be admissible, such as proving motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, indentity, absence of mistake or lack of accident (Prosecutor) must give reasonable notice of such evidence
RULE 405: Methods of Proving Character
(A) By Reputation or Opinion. When evidence of a person’s character or character trait is admissible, it may be proved by testimony about the person’s reputation or by testimony in the form of an opinion. On cross-examination of the character witness, the court may allow an inquiry into relevant specific instancesof the person’s conduct.(B) By Specific Instances of Conduct. When a person’s character or character trait is an essential element of the charge, claim, or defense, the character or trait may also be proved by relevant specific instances of the person’s conduct.
RULE 406: Habit; Routine Practice
Evidence of a person’s habit or an organization’s routine practice may be admitted to prove that on a particular occasion the person or organization acted in accordance with the habit or routine practice. The court may admit this evidence regardless of whether it is corroborated or whether there was eyewitness.
RULE 407: Subsequent Remedial Measures
When measures are taken that would have made an earlier injury or harm less likely to occur, evidence of the subseqent measures is not admissible to prove: negligence; culpable conduct a defeat in a product or its design; or a need for a warning or instructionBut the court may admit this evidence for impeachment or - if disputed - proving ownership, control, or feasibility of precautionary measures.
RULE 408: Compromise Offers and Negotiations
(A) Prohibited Uses. Evidence of the following is not admissible - on behalf of any party - either to prove or disprove the validity or amount of a disputed claim or to impeach by a prior inconsistent statement or a contradiction:(1) furnishing, promising, or offering - or accepting, promising to accept, or offering to accept - valuable consideration in compromising or attempting to compromise the claim; and(2) conduct or a statement made during compromise negotiations about the claim - except when offered in a criminal case and when the negotiations related to a claim by a public office in the exercise of its regulatory, investigative, or enforcement authority.
RULE 408:Compromise Offers and Negotiations continued…
(B) Exceptions. The court may admit this evidence for another purpose such as proving a witness’s bias or prejudice, negating a contention of undue delay, or proving an effort to obstruct a criminal investigation or prosecution
RULE 409: Offers to Pay Medical and Similar Expenses
Evidence of furnishing, promising to pay, or offering to pay medical school, hospital, or similar expenses resulting from an injury is not admissible to prove liability for the injury.
RULE 410: Pleas, Plea Discussions, and Related Statements
(A) Prohibited Uses. In a civil or criminal case, evidence of the following is not admissible against the defendant who made the plea or participated in the plea discusssion:(1) a guilty plea that was later withdrawn;(2) a nolo contendere plea; (3) a statement made during a proceeding on either of those pleas under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 or comparable state procedure; or(4) a statement made during plea discussions with an attorney for prosectuing authority if the discussions did not result in a guilty plea.
RULE 410:Pleas, Plea Discussions, and Related Statements continued…
(B) Exceptions. The court may admit a statement described in Rule 410(a)(3) or (4):(1) in any proceeding in which another statement made during the same plea or plea discussions has been introduced, if in fairness the statments ought to be considered together ; or(2) in a criminal proceeding for perjury or false statement, if the defendant made the statement under oath, on the record, and with counsel present.
RULE 411: Liability Insurance
Evidence that a person was or was not insured against liability is not admissible to prove whether the person acted negligently or otherwise wrongfully. But the court may admit this evidence for another purpose such as proving a witness’s bias or prejudice or proving agency, ownership, or control.
RULE 412: Sex-Offense Cases: The Victim’s Sexual Behavior or Predisposition
(A) Prohibited Uses. The following evidence is not admissible in a civil or criminal proceeding involving alleged sexual misconduct:(1) evidence offered to prove that a victim engaged in other sexual behavior; or(2) evidence offered to prove that a victim’s sexual predisposition