Article 9 Flashcards

1
Q

What is Article 9?

A

The absolute right to hold and change religion or belief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the basic structure of Art 9?

A

a. The freedom of thought, conscience and religion and
b. to change religion or belief.
c. Manifestation of belief or religion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is protected under A and B?

A

It has absolute protection, states are not allowed to enforce particular ideologies or religions on their population
It is the hallmark of a democratic, pluralistic and tolerant society
Different beliefs are readily accepted by the Courts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are some examples of interference under part A and B?

A

Refusal to register religious groups
Preventing worship
Imposing a belief on individuals through coercion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is protected under C?

A

Qualified right, can be justified under 9(2)
Manifestation must be intrinsically linked to the belief
Can be difficult to prove and less readily accepted by Courts than a belief itself
Only subject to limited that are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or for the protection of rights and freedoms of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are examples of what’s protected under C?

A

Wearing religious clothing/religious symbol
Taking an action which is intrinsically linked to your belief (praying)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a case study that shows us that States cannot interfere with the absolute right to hold or change a belief?

A

Ivanova v Bulgaria (2009)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Are churches capable of exercising Article 9 rights? Case?

A

Yes they can. As long as they are not a profit-making corporation.

Church of Bessarabia v Moldova (2002)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does Section 13 HRA tell us about religion? Case?

A

It asks the courts to have particular regard to the importance of freedom of religion when deciding cases that may have impact on the exercise of the right.

KH v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the requirements for a belief to be protected? Case for both?

A

The belief must attain a certain level of cogency, seriousness, cohesion, and importance (Eweida v UK 2013)
The belief itself must be one which may be considered as compatible with respect for human dignity- must be deemed worthy of protection in European democratic society (Campbell and Cosans v the United Kingdom 1982)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does the Equality Act 2010 say regarding protected beliefs? Case?

A

Grainger v Nicholson (2010)
In context of discrimination:
1. The belief must be genuinely held
2. It must be a belief and not an opinion or viewpoint on the present state of information available
3. It must be a belief as to a weighty and substantial aspect of human life and behaviour.
4. It must attain a certain level of cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance.
5. It must be worthy of respect in a democratic society, be not incompatible with human dignity and not conflict with the fundamental rights of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the main case talking about protection for non-religious belief

A

R (on the application of Williamson) v Secretary of State for Education and Employment (2005)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the accepted beliefs under Art 9?

A

Religion: Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam etc.
Non religious beliefs- Pacificism, Conscientious objectors, attachment to secularism, veganism, temperance, climate change etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Is the fear of catching covid-19 a protected belief under the Equality Act 2010?

A

No- as shown in X v Y (2020)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is manifestation?

A

Manifestation implies a perception on the part of adherents that a course of activity is in some manner prescribed or required
Action must be a direct expression of the belief, though it need not be a definite, universally acknowledged, requirement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How can something be a manifestation?

A

To be a manifestation of a belief an action must:
Relate to a protected belief
Be intimately linked to the belief itself (Arrowsmith v UK (1978) and Pretty v UK (2002))

17
Q

Are the covid-19 vaccine beliefs held to be religious in nature?

A

Yes- Wierowska v HC-One Oval Limited [2022]

18
Q

What is held to be manifestation?

A

Proselytism- the policy of attempting to convert people’s religious or political beliefs
General participation in the life of a religious community
The slaughtering of animals in accordance with religious prescriptions
Religious dress
Dietary requirements
Corporal punishment in schools

19
Q

What is not held to be manifestation of religion?

A

The distribution of pacifist leaflets to soldiers
refusing to sell contraceptives that had been prescribed to women
Assisting in anothers suicide
Commercial advertising to promote a belief

20
Q

What is an interference with manifestation?

A

Normally involves the taking of a measure by a state authority; it can, where a positive obligation on the part of state authorities is recognised, also involve the failure to take some necessary action.

21
Q

What are some examples of interference of manifestation? Cases?

A

Criminal or administrative penalty (Kokkinakis v. Greece)
Dismissal (Ivanova v. Bulgaria 2007)
A disciplinary sanction, regardless of its severity (Korostelev v. Russia, § 50)
A physical obstacle to the persons exercising their rights under Article 9, such as the interruption of a meeting by the police (Boychev and Others v. Bulgaria)
The dissolution of a religious organisation (Jehovah’s Witnesses of Moscow and Others v. Russia, §§ 99-103; Biblical Centre of the Chuvash Republic v. Russia, § 52;
Denial of authorisation, recognition or approval designed to facilitate the exercise of the said rights (Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova; Vergos v. Greece)

22
Q

What is said about employment and the workplace in Art 9? Cases?

A

Art 9 does not require active facilitation of religious beliefs in the workplace (Stedman v United Kingdom 1997)
Part of the difficulty in the workplace is the idea that the employee is free to resign to manifest their beliefs
There is a wide margin of discretion (Dahlab v Switzerland 2001)

23
Q

What are some other issues with public establishments and article 9?

A

Where there are links to safety or security concerns, and the removal of clothing or artefacts is temporary, there are unlikely to be infringements or violations