Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

OCR A-Level Law Paper 3 > Article 8 - Case List > Flashcards

Article 8 - Case List Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
MBE flashcards MPRE flashcards Civil Procedure 1L flashcards
1
Q

Copland v UK: Decision

A

Surveillance of a person’s work email was not justfied as there was no law to base these actions upon

There must be law that allows for such an intereference and this must be clear and predictable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Sheffield and Horsham v UK: Facts

A

Two applicants had had gender realignment from male to female. UK wouldn’t recognise new gender or allow transgender post-ops to marry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sheffield and Horsham v UK: Decision

A

ECtHR recognised UK’s failure to update the law and recognised social acceptance of transsexualism and problem they encounter post-op

Lead to:

  • Gender Recognition Act 2004
  • Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Private Life: Botta v Italy

A

Private life includes a ‘person’s physical and psychological integrity’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Private Life: Pretty v UK

A

A person’s physical and psychological integrity will include: physical and social identity, gender identity, name and sexual orientation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Private Life: Peck v UK

A

A person’s physical and psychological integrity includes autonomy and dignity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Private Life: Dudgeon v UK

A

Private life includes sexual orientation and freedom including transgender men and women

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Private Life: BB v UK

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Private Life: Goodwin v UK

A

Barriers imposed on a transgender person violated their Art 8 rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Private Life: Gillan and Quinton v UK: Facts

A

Police extended powers under s.44 Terrorism Act 2000 to stop and search any person without reasonable suspicion (which is usually required for stop and search)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Private Life: Gillan and Guinton: Decision

A

Power was used to search people on their way to an arms fair. Despite wide margin of appreciation issues of national security, the ECtHR believeed this way a disproportionate use of pwoer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Private Life: Halford v UK

A

No legal basis allowing the monitoring of the police telecommunication system therefore breach of Art 8

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Private Life: MS v Sweden

A

Medical data is considered confidential for both adults and children who are considered Gillick competant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Private Life: Axon v Secretary of State for Health

A

If the child is considered Gillick competant then the parental righ to determine medical treatment is ended

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Private Life: S and Marper v UK

A

The blanket retention of DNA profiles takenfrom innocent people posed a disproportionate interference with the right to private life

Under Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 only people convicted of an offence will have fingerprints and DNA stored indefinately

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Family Life: Gaskin v UK

A
17
Q

Family Life: Schalk and Anor v Austria

A
18
Q

Family Life: Lebbink v Netherlands

A

what consitutes a family depends on close family ties and is a matter of fact and degree

19
Q

Family Life: Yousef v Netherlands

A

the decision of the state to remove a child into care must be done proportionately as there’s a wide margin of appreciation in these cases. However, child’s rights are paramount

20
Q

Family Life: Johansen v Norway

A

court stated that particular weight should be attached to the best interests of the child, which may override those of the parent

21
Q

Family Life: Agyarko and Ikuga v Secretary of State for the Home Department

A

both women wanted to stay in the UK to be with their family, but were here illegally

Only in exceptional circumstances would they be allowed to stay, ie. where there are insurmountable obstacles in the way

22
Q

Family Life: Nasri v France

A

allowed to stay in France as that is where his family (parents and siblings) lived

23
Q

Family Life: Wood v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis

A

police taking and retianing photos of the protestors opposed to the arms trade was a violation

24
Q

Family Life: R (T) v CC Greater Manchester and ors

A

a blanket disclosure of minor previous convictions during employment checks was disproportionatte under Art 8

25
Q

Family Life: R (on application on F and Thompson) v SoS for the Home Dept: Facts

A

s.82 Sexual Offences Act 2003

a person who has been sentenced to more than 30 month imprisonment for a sex offence to notify police where they are living and any travel they do for the rest of their life

26
Q

Family Life: R (on application on F and Thompson) v SoS for the Home Dept: Decision

A

UK SC held inability to review the requirement was disproportionate and violated Art 8

27
Q

Family Life: AB v SoS for Justice

A

no justification to refuse a pre-op transgender woman who was held in a male prison in the right to move to a female prison

Violation

28
Q

Home: Khatan v UK

A

the law treats owners and occupiers of property equally

ie. renters have the same rights as owners for example

29
Q

Home: Connors v UK

A

ECtHR accepted that land where caravans were parked lawfully was the person’s home

30
Q

Home: Price v Leeds City Council

A

caravans parked on a playing field were not a persons home

31
Q

Home: Niemietz v Germany: Facts

A

police searched a lawyer’s office to try to identify a suspect. The search was part of ‘home’ and the lawyers private life

32
Q

Home: Niemietz v Germany: Decision

A

‘it would be too restrictive to limit the notion of an ‘inner circle’ in which the individual may live his own personal life as he chooses and to exclude there from entirely the outside world not encompassed within that circle’

included work

33
Q

Correspondance: Barbulescu v Romania

A

the employer was found to be in violation as their IT policy didn’t set out the extent to which their internet usage and online communications would be monitored

34
Q

Correspondance: PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd

A

neither Art 8 or 10 have prioroty over the other and it is decided on a case by case basis

35
Q

Correspondance: Campbell v MGN Ltd

A

the publication of photographs of her outside a rehabilitation clinic was a disproportionate interference with the rights to privacy, even though she was recieving treatment in the public domain

36
Q

Correspondance: Murray v Express Newspapers PLC

A

the children of people who were famous should not expect to be photographed without their knowledge or consent if they has not publicised their children

OCR A-Level Law Paper 3 (18 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions