Article 8 Flashcards

1
Q

1) Intro

A
  • Under Article 8, everyone has the right to respect for his private & family life, home & correspondence.
  • S.7 HRA allows a prospective victim to bring proceedings against authority in an appropriate court/tribunal.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

2) Respect

A
  • Respect under Article 8 means the state must not interfere as everyone has the right to respect for his private & family life, home & correspondence.
  • The state has a positive obligation under Article 8 & must take positive steps to protect these rights.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3) Article 8.2

A

•Under Article 8.2, there shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law & is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of:

  • national security
  • public safety
  • prevention of disorder/crime
  • protection of health/morals
  • protection of rights & freedoms of others.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

4) Von Hannover

A
  • The law aims to protect a person’s right to respect for his private & family life, home & correspondence.
  • In Von Hannover, the court said everyone has a legitimate expectation that their private life will be protected.
  • (In Campbell, it was held that the publications of her photos outside a rehab clinic was an interference with her right to privacy.)
  • (The law protects children of celebrities from publications of unauthorised photos, unless their parents have exposed them to publicity (Murray).)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

5) Interference

A

•In Wood, the police had interfered with C’s right to respect for his private life as they failed to justify the interference was in accordance with law, necessary & proportionate, & for one/more of the legitimate aims.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

6) Apply

A

Has C’s right to private life been interfered with?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

7) Private information

A
  • The tort of misuse of private information is about releasing info about someone.
  • In Vidal-Hall it was confirmed the misuse of private information is a tort.
  • The tort of defamation is when a statement is said about someone which is incorrect.
  • Applicants have to show the publication of the statement caused/is likely to cause them serious harm.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

8) Only if relevant

A
  • Respecting the confidentiality of health data is a vital principal in the legal systems of all member states under the Convention.
  • Under the Malicious Communications Act 1998, it’s an offence to send another a letter/article which conveys:
  • a message which is indecent/grossly offensive,
  • a threat,
  • info which is false & the sender knows/believes it’s false.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

9) Apply

A

Apply cards 7 & 8

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

10) Private life and gender (only if relevant)

A
  • Gender Recognition Act 2004 allows transsexual individuals to apply for legal recognition for their new gender.
  • The Marriage Act 2013 has legalised same-sex marriage.
  • In AB v Secretary the continued detention of a pre-operative transgender woman in a male prison breached her right to privacy.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

11) Family life (only if relevant)

A
  • Article 8 gives the right to enjoy family relationships without interference from the state.
  • This includes the right to live with or regular contact with family.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

12) Home (only if relevant)

A
  • Public authorities shouldn’t stop you from entering/living in your home without good reason, nor should they enter without your permission.
  • ‘Home’ is a right to enjoy your existing home peacefully, rather than a right to a house.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

13) PJS v News Group

A
  • In PJS v News Group, it was decided that neither Article 8 nor Article 10 has preference over the other.
  • The one which takes precedence will be decided based on the individual facts of each case.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

14) Conclusion

A

Has C’s right to respect for private life been violated?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

15) Remedy

A

Injunction or damages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly