article 6 (2) and (3) Flashcards

1
Q

what is article 6 (2) (like the meaning ygm)

A

“Innocent until proven guilty.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what case gives us this definition

A

Woolmington v DPP (1932)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what right does this also include

A

right to remain silent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what case tells us this

A

Saunders v UK (1997)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is article 6 (3)

A

Minimum Rights for Suspects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what does that mean

A

a suspects charged with criminal offences should have certain minimum rights that cannot be taken away.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are the 5 things included underneath this

A

To be informed in a language he understands of the charges against him

To be given adequate time and facilities to prepare a defense

To defend themselves in person or through legal assistance and to be given legal assistance

To examine witnesses and for there to be the same conditions on witnesses on both sides

To an interpreter if he cannot understand the language of the court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

To be informed in a language he understands of the charges against him case (italy)

A

 Brozicek v Italy (1989)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

To be given adequate time and facilities to prepare a defense case (some mad name) (greece)

A

 Hadjianastassiou v Greece (1992)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

To defend themselves in person or through legal assistance and to be given legal assistance for free where the interests of justice require case (uk)

A

Benham v UK (1995)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

To examine witnesses and for there to be the same conditions on witnesses on both sides case (france)

A

Saidi v France (1993)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what case defined what a criminal defense is

A

Engel v Netherlands (1976)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly