Article 3 Jurisdiction & Service, Appearance Of Court Flashcards
CPLR 301
The traditional basis by which the courts of a state may exercise jurisdiction over a person (i.e., in personam jurisdiction) is:
(a) presence of the person within the state
(b) enforcement power of the state
(c) the plaintiffs selection of venue
(d) the ability of the court to seize persons located out of the state.
Answer: (a)
CPLR 301 states that a court may exercise such jurisdiction over per sons as might have been exercised heretofore. Generally, this refers to the exercise of jurisdiction over the person by virtue of the person’s presence within the state.
CPLR 302 extends the traditional basis of jurisdiction over a person to include persons located outside the state who perform certain acts that are closely connected to New York State.
CPLR 302
If a nondomiciliary makes a contract outside New York to supply goods or services in New York:
(a) a New York court has a statutory basis for exercising personal jurisdiction
(b) a New York court does not have any basis for exercising personal jurisdiction
(c) only a court of the state where the contract was made may exercise personal jurisdiction
(d) only Federal courts have personal jurisdiction in such an instance.
Answer: (a)
CPLR 302(a)(l) provides that if a nondomiciliary (e.g., person not domiciled in New York) contracts outside New York to supply goods or services in this State, a statutory basis for exercising personal jurisdiction exists.
NOTE that the state in which the contract was made and the Federal courts may also have personal jurisdiction but choices (c) and (d) are incorrect because they are not the only courts.
CPLR 302
A nondomiciliary who regularly does business within New York State commits a tort outside the state which injures a person within the State. As to this:
(a) New York courts have a statutory basis for exercising personal jurisdiction
(b) New York courts have no basis for exercising personal jurisdiction
(c) New York courts only have personal jurisdiction over domiciliary
(d) there is nothing in the CPLR covering this question
Answer: (a)
CPLR 302(a)(3) provides that there is personal jurisdiction over a non domiciliary who commits a tort outside New York (e.g., manufactures a defective product) which injures a person in New York. This is a classic example of “long-arm” jurisdiction.
CPLR 302
In which one of the following would a New York court have no statutory basis for exercising personal jurisdiction over a nondomiciliary of the state, where the alleged torturous conduct occurred inside the state:
(a) defamation of character
(b) restraint of trade
(c) malpractice
(d) assault and battery
(e) a statutory basis would exist for all of the above.
Answer: (a)
CPLR 302(a)(2) which provides a statutory basis for a New York court to exercise personal jurisdiction over a nondomiciliary who commits a torturous act within New York expressly exempts defamation from its scope.
CPLR 302
The ABC Company, a corporation located and doing business in Ohio, manufactures a defective spray can which is distributed nationally. The spray can has a propensity to explode and cause severe physical injury to the user. Jones, a New York State resident, could obtain New York “long-arm jurisdiction” over ABC in which of the following instances:
1. Jones is injured when he uses the spray can in New York
2. Jones is injured when he uses the spray can on a motor trip to New Jersey
3. Jones is injured when he uses the spray can in Ohio
(a) 1, 2 and 3
(b) 1 and 2, only
(c) 1 and 3, only
(d) 1, only
Answer: (d)
CPLR 302(a)(3) enables the state to exercise “long-arm jurisdiction” over any nondomiciliary if the nondomiciliary commits a tortuous act without the state (e.g., manufacturing a defective product) causing injury to a person within the state (e.g., as with Jones when he was in New York) if the nondomiciliary expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state (e.g., is a national distributor) and derives substantial revenue from interstate commerce.
Choice (d) is correct. All other choices are incorrect because the injury occurred outside New York.
CPLR 302
Select all correct answers.
Quinn’s Quilting is a small home-based handcrafting company located in Utah. Quinn usually makes handcraft items and sells them from his porch. In order to meet demand, Quinn has hastened production, thereby crafting defective products. In an action commenced in a New York court by Roberts, a New York resident, New York could obtain “long arm jurisdiction” over Quinn in which of the following situations:
(a) Roberts buys a defective product from Quinn in Utah and is injured by the product in New York. Roberts sues for damages sustained by the injury.
(b) Quinn travels to Glens Falls, New York to sell Roberts a non defective product but does not deliver it. Roberts sues for breach of contract.
(c) Quinn drives to New York City, strikes Roberts during an argument, and thereafter returns to Utah. Roberts sues for damages sustained by the blow.
(d) Quinn enters into a contract to supply quilts to Roberts in New York. Quinn subsequently mails non-defective products to Roberts in New York but fails to ship the entire product as promised. Roberts sues for breach of contract.
Answer: (b), (c) and (d)
CPLR 302(a)(l) states that New York may obtain personal jurisdiction over a nondomiciliary who (i) transacts any business within the state, or (ii) contracts anywhere to supply goods in New York. Thus, choices (b) and (d) are correct. CPLR 302(a)(2) states that New York may obtain personal jurisdiction over a nondomiciliary who commits a tortious act (i.e., an act that injures another) within the state. Thus choice (c) is correct.
Choice (a) is incorrect under CPLR 302(a)(3) because there is an insufficient connection to New York (i.e., no regular solicitation of business in New York or substantial revenue from interstate commerce).
CPLR 302(d)
Plaintiff, a UK domiciliary, obtains a defamation judgment against Defendant, a New York domiciliary, for comments appearing in the UK and New York. Plaintiff obtains a judgment in the UK and seeks to attach assets of Defendant in New York. The New York Courts have personal jurisdiction over:
(a) Plaintiff, only
(b) Defendant, only
(c) Plaintiff and defendant
(d) none of the above.
Answer: (c)
The New York Courts have jurisdiction over the defendant because he is a resident of New York. The Court also has “long arm” jurisdic- tion over plaintiff by virtue of CPLR 302(d).
CPLR 303
A person not subject to personal jurisdiction who commences an action in New York State and on whose behalf no attorney has appeared is deemed to designate the ________ as his agent for the service of a summons by the defendant.
(a) judge
(b) defendant’s attorney
(c) clerk of the court
(d) Secretary of State.
Answer: (c)
CPLR 303 provides that the clerk of the court is deemed the agent of a person not subject to personal jurisdiction who commences an action in New York and on whose behalf no attorney has appeared. This provision is for the benefit of the defendant to commence a new action against the plaintiff in case the court in which he is currently being sued would not have jurisdiction over his counterclaim. If the counterclaim would be within the court’s jurisdiction, defendant does not need this section since the plaintiff, by bringing suit in that court, is deemed to have submitted to the exercise of personal jurisdiction over him by that court.
CPLR 304
Under the CPLR, an action is commenced by:
(a) filing a summons and complaint (or summons and notice)
(b) filing a summons and complaint with the sheriff of the county in which plaintiff resides
(c) filing a notice of petition with the clerk of the court
(d) service of the summons and complaint upon the defendant.
Answer: (a)
CPLR 304. The CPLR provides that an action is generally commenced by filing the summons and complaint (or summons and notice). See CPLR 304 for clarification. Thus, choice (a) is correct.
CPLR 304
A special proceeding may be commenced by:
I. filing a petition
II. serving a notice of petition and a petition
III. filing a summons and complaint.
(a) I, only
(b) I and II, only
(c) II and III, only
(d) I, II and III.
Answer: (a)
CPLR 304 provides that a special proceeding is commenced by filing a petition in accordance with CPLR 2102. Thus, choice (a) is correct. Service no longer commences a special proceeding. Therefore, choices (b), (c) and (d) are incorrect. The filing of a summons and complaint commences an action.
CPLR 305
If a court directs that a new party be joined in an action and the order is not made upon the new party’s motion, which of the following shall be filed with the clerk and served upon the new party:
(a) a supplemental summons
(b) a certified copy of the court’s order
(c) an original summons together with a certified copy of the court’s order
(d) an order to show cause and a petition why he should not be joined
(e) an amended summons.
Answer: (a)
CPLR 305(a) provides that a supplemental summons must be filed with the clerk and then served on the new party to join the court-ordered party.
CPLR 305
With respect to proof of service of a summons:
(a) it may not be amended
(b) it may only be amended in a court’s discretion
(c) it may be amended as a matter of right within six months of being filed
(d) it may be amended as a matter of right within three months of being filed.
Answer: (b)
CPLR 305(c) provides that proof of service may be amended in the court’s discretion.
Choices (c) and (d) are incorrect since the CPLR does not prescribe a time limit.
CPLR 306
In the case of personal service, proof of service shall include:
(a) the address of the person who served the summons
(b) only the date of service and the name of the person upon whom service was made
(c) a description of the physical premises where service was made
(d) a description of the person served as to sex, skin color, hair color, approximate age, height and weight, and other identifying features.
Answer: (d)
CPLR 306(b) provides that when personal service is made, proof of service shall include a full description of the person served as contained in choice (d). This is to ensure that the defendant is actually served.
Choice (b) is incorrect since this is not what is only required. Choices (a) and (c) are not required under CPLR 306.
CPLR 306
Proof of service shall be:
(a) in affidavit form when made by a sheriff
(b) in the form of an acknowledgment by plaintiff
(c) sworn to before a clerk of the court having jurisdiction
(d) in the form of a certificate, when made by an authorized public officer.
Answer: (d)
In cases other than when a signed acknowledgment is provided by the defendant, CPLR 306(d) requires a proof of service to be in the form of an affidavit unless service is made by a sheriff or other authorized public officer, in which case it shall be made in the form of a certificate.
CPLR 306-a
Select the correct answer.
Upon an action commenced in the Supreme or County Court by the filing of the summons and complaint.
(a) the clerk shall serve a copy of the summons and complaint on the defendant
(b) an index number shall be assigned and the index number fee shall be paid
(c) the clerk shall file proof of service
(d) the plaintiff shall file proof of service.
Answer: (b)
CPLR 306-a provides that upon filing the summons and complaint, an index number shall be assigned and the index number fee shall be paid. Choice (b) is correct.
Choice (a) is incorrect because the plaintiff serves the summons and complaint.
Choices (c) and (d) are incorrect and have no support in the CPLR.
CPLR 306-a
State the correct procedure by which an action is generally commenced and objection is made if service is not timely filed in the Supreme and County Courts:
I summons and complaint are served upon defendant within the statutory period
II summons and complaint are filed
III if service is not timely made, the defendant motions to dismiss.
(a) I and II only
(b) I, II, then III
(c) II, I, then III
(d) II and I only.
Answer: (c)
Choice (c) lists the correct procedure by which an action is commenced and objection is made if service is not timely. In this regard, sections CPLR 306-a and 306-b must be read together.
NOTE: See special service rules when statute of limitations is less than four months. Generally, however, service must be made within 120 days after commencement of the action.
CPLR 307
Personal service upon the State of New York shall be made by delivering the summons to:
(a) the office of the Lieutenant-Governor
(b) the office of the State Comptroller
(c) the Attorney-General of the State, only at his office
(d) an Assistant Attorney-General at an office of the Attorney-General.
Answer: (d)
CPLR 307(1) provides that personal service is made upon delivery of the summons to an Assistant Attorney-General at any office of the Attorney-General. In this regard, note that acknowledged personal service by mail pursuant to CPLR 312-a is available with respect to service upon the state.
All other choices are unsupported by the CPLR.
CPLR 307
If personal service on a state officer sued solely in an official capacity is made to obtain personal jurisdiction, such service:
(a) must be made only on the chief executive officer of the agency
(b) must be made only on the chief executive officer of the agency or one of his two top deputies
(c) may be made on the Attorney-General of the state
(d) may be made on the official.
Answer: (d)
CPLR 307(2) provides that personal service on a state officer sued solely in an official capacity or state agency, which shall be required to obtain personal jurisdiction over such an officer or agency must be made on the individual or a person designated by the chief executive officer to accept the summons.
NOTE that mailing by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the specified offices and also personal service to an assistant attorney- general is also permissible.
CPLR 308
When service of a summons is made by delivering the summons within the state to a person of suitable age and discretion at defendant’s actual place of business and mailing a copy of the summons to the defendant’s last known residence, proof of such service must be filed within ____ days with ______.
(a) thirty.…. the clerk of the court
(b) thirty.…. opposing counsel
(c) twenty.…. counsel
(d) twenty.…. the clerk of the court
(e) twenty.…. the judge.
Answer: (d)
CPLR 308(2) provides that the maximum number of days to file proof of service is twenty days. The statute clarifies that “actual place of business” includes any location which, through regular solicitation or advertisement, is held out as its place of business.
CPLR 308
Select the best answer.
Personal service on a nondomiciliary when long-arm jurisdiction does not exist may be made by which one of the following:
(a) delivery of the summons to him personally, wherever he is found
(b) delivery of the summons to him personally, within the State
(c) delivery of the summons to a person of suitable age and discretion at his home and sending a copy to his business office in an envelope which clearly states that it contains important legal papers
(d) affixing the summons to the door of his last known residence and sending a copy to his actual place of business by first class mail
(e) either (b), (c), or (d).
Answer: (b)
CPLR 308 provides that personal service may be made by personally serving the potential defendant within New York State.
Choice (a) is incorrect since personal service outside New York is insufficient to acquire personal jurisdiction over a nondomiciliary when long-arm jurisdiction does not exist.
Choice (c) is incorrect since CPLR 308(2) states the envelope must not indicate that the papers contained therein relate to an action.
Choice (d) is incorrect since CPLR 308(4) requires that the summons be affixed to defendant’s actual residence (last known residence will not suffice).