Article 3 Flashcards
The Role of Negotiable Instruments
- Created to be reliable cash substitute
- To be easily transferable, with ready assurances of payment
- These goals are supposed to be achieved by resort to the four corners of the paper.
Negotiability elements
- A promise or order
- A signed writing
- An unconditional promise/order
- Payment of a fixed amount of money
- Payable to bearer or order
- Payable on demand or at a definite time
- No additional undertakings
Negotiability: A promise or order
Order = written instruction to pay money signed by the person giving the instruction
Instrument type: Check
Parties: drawer, drawee (bank), payee
Promise = written unequivocal undertaking to pay money signed by the person undertaking to pay. An acknowledgment of an obligation by the obligor is not a promise unless the obligor undertakes to pay the obligation.
Instrument type: Note (aka Promissory Note)
Parties: maker (person that makes promise); payee
Mere acknowledging the existence of a debt is not enough
Cashier’s Check
The bank is both the drawer and the drawee.
The bank takes the money from the person’s bank account (the one paying), and the bank instructs themselves to pay to payee.
Negotiability: A Signed Writing
- Signed-includes using any symbols executed or adopted with present intention to adopt or accept a writing.
* It may be printed, stamped or written
* Partial names, ficticious names, trade names, initials or even thumbprint may suffice. - Writing-includes printing, typewriting, or any other intentional reduction to tangible form.
Emails do not constitute “writings”
Tangible form important for physical possession
Negotiability: A signed Writing
Writing must be signed by:
- the person undertaking the promise to pay (maker); or
- the person giving the instruction to pay (drawer)
Negotiability: Unconditional promise/order
A promise or order defeats negotiability (conditional) if:
A promise or order defeats negotiability (conditional) if:
1. Express condition-it it’s expressly conditioned on the occurrence of a specified even then it fails the unconditional requirement.
- Subject or governed by another record- “controlled by the terms of another record”
“subject to”
“governed by”
“any rights and obligations with respect to the promise or order stated in another record”
“pursuant to” it’s still unconditional
referencing or acknolwedging existence of another record - still unconditional
- Rights or obligations stated in another record-any rights and obligations can’t be in another record.
“Pursuant to”
Does not defeat unconditional requirement.
these words may simply indicate that the promissory note relates to or arises from the Purchase Agreement.
Negotiability: Unconditional promise/order
Exceptions to conditions that defeat negotiability
- Promise/order contains a reference to another record for a statement of rights with respect to collateral, prepayment, or acceleration,
- Payment is limited to resort to a particular fund or source (e.g. “John Smith’s Bank of America personal checking account ending in 1234”)
- Implied conditions
Negotiability: Unconditional promise/order
Why does the existence of a condition defeats negotiability?
-Cash substitute
-Right to payment under a negotiable instrument should be assessable by reference to nothing more than the instrument itself (4 corners).
Limiting negotiable instruments to unconditional obligations to pay eliminates any need to look beyond the face of the writing itself.
Negotiability: Payment of a Fixed Amount of Money
- Promise/order must be for the payment of money
- Amount of payment obligation must be fixed
Negotiability: Payment of a Fixed Amount of Money
Not Money
- diamonds (even if traded in a commodities market with easily discernible prices)
- Stocks
- Virtual currency (bitcoin)
Negotiability: Payment of a Fixed Amount of Money
Money
-Dominican pesos
-Vietnamese Dong
Foreign currency
Negotiability: Payment of a Fixed Amount of Money
To what “fixed amount” this element applies to?
The “fixed amount” requirement applies only to the PRINCIPAL amount. It does NOT apply to:
-interest
-attorneys fees
-collection fees
-prepayment penalties
-late fees
Negotiability: Payable to Bearer or Order
Payable to Bearer
Payable to Bearer: person in possession of the instrument. Does not state a payee
“payable to bearer”
“payable to the order of bearer”
“the person in possession of the promise/order is entitled to this payment”
“pay to bearer”
“payable to the order of cash”
What if a negotiable instrument purports to be “payable to bearer” and “payable to order”?
Then it is “payable to bearer”
Negotiability: Payable to Bearer or Order
Payable to Order
Person identified in the instrument
payable to “the order of …” or to an identified person or order.
Difference between “payable to” v. “payable to the order of”
“payable to …” - only payable to that person, cannot be transferred.
“payable to the order of ….” - the person can transfer to other people. The person has the right to transfer to others.
Negotiability: Payable on Demand or at a Definite Time
Payable on Demand
Payable on demand if:
-It states that its payable or at sight, or otherwise indicates that is payable at the will of the holder, or
-does not state any time of payment
“on demand” “on sight”
Negotiability: Payable on Demand or at a Definite Time
Payable at a Definite Time
Payable at a Definite Time if
its payable on elapse of a definite period of time after sight or acceptance or at a fixed date or dates or at a time or times readily ascertainable at the time the promise/order is issued, subject to rights of:
-pre-payment
-acceleration
-extension at the option of the holder, or
-extension to a further definite time at the option of the maker or acceptor or automatically upon or after a specified act or event.