ARTICLE 127 Flashcards

1
Q

Section 2, Art. III, of the 1987 Constitution provides

A

no search warrant or warrant of arrest shall issue except upon
probable cause to be determined personally by the judge after examination under oath or affirmation of the complainant and the witnesses he may produce, and particularly describing the place
to be searched and the persons or things to be seized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

WHAT IS A SEARCH WARRANT?

A

an order in writing issued in
the name of the People of the Philippines, signed
by a judge and directed to a peace officer, commanding him to search for personal property described therein and bring it before the court.(R126, S1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

WHERE DO YOU APPLY FOR A
SEARCH WARRANT?

A

a)Any court within whose territorial jurisdiction a crime wascommitted.
b)For compelling reasons stated in the application, any court within the judicial region where the crime was committed if the place of the commission of the crime is known, or any court
within the judicial region where the warrant shall be enforced.
However, if the criminal action has already been filed, the
application shall only be made in the court where the criminal
action is pending. (R126, S2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

GUIDELINES IN RELATION TO THE AUTHORITY OF COURTS TO ISSUE WARRANTS OF ARREST (MALALOAN V. CA)

A

1.The Court wherein the criminal case is pending shall have primary jurisdiction to issue search warrants necessitated by and for purposes of said case. An application for a search warrant may be filed with
another court only under extreme and compelling circumstances.
2.When the latter court issues the search warrant, a motion to quash the same may be filed in and shall be resolved by said court,
3.Where no motion to quash the search warrant was filed in or resolved by the issuing court, the interested party may move in the court where the criminal
case is pending for the suppression as evidence of the personal property seized
under the warrant if the same is offered therein for said purpose.
4. Where the court which issued the search warrant denies the motion to quash the same and is not otherwise prevented from further proceeding thereon, all personal property seized under the warrant shall forthwith be transmitted by it to the court wherein the criminal case is pending,
5. where the same criminal offense is charged in different informations or complaints and filed in two or more courts with concurrent original jurisdiction
over the criminal action. When the issue of which court will try the case shall have been resolved, such court shall be considered as vested with primary jurisdiction to act on applications for search warrants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

WHAT IS THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION UNDER ADMINISTRATIVE MATTER NO. 99-10-09-SC?

A

A.M. No. 99-10-09-SC authorizes the
Executive Judge and Vice Executive Judges of the RTCs of Manila and Quezon City to act on all applications for search warrants involving heinous crimes, illegal gambling, dangerous drugs and illegal possession of firearms on application filed by the PNP, NBI,PAOC-TF, and REACT-TF.
(Spouses Marimla v. People)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

WHAT PERSONAL PROPERTY MAY BE SEIZED?

A

(a) Subject of the offense;
(b) Stolen or embezzled and other proceeds, or fruits of
the offense; or
(c) Used or intended to be used as the means of committing an offense. (R126, S3)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

WHAT ARE THE REQUISITES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A SEARCH WARRANT?

A

A search warrant shall not issue except upon probable cause in connection with one specific
offense to be determined personally by the judge after examination under oath or affirmation of the complainant and the witnesses he may produce, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the things to be seized, which may be anywhere in the Philippines. (R126, S4)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

WHAT ARE THE REQUISITES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A SEARCH WARRANT?

A

(1) probable cause;
(2) PC determined personally by the judge;
(3) The complainant and the witnesses personally examined by the judge (IN writing and under oath or affirmation)
(4) The applicant and the witnesses testify on facts personally known to them; and
(5) The warrant specifically describes the place to be searched and the things to be seized
(Republic v.Sandiganbayan)
(6) The warrant is in connection with ONE SPECIFIC OFFENSE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

WHEN IS THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PLACETO BE SEARCHED SUFFICIENT?

A

Uy v. BIR

description of a place to be searched is sufficient if the officer with the warrant can, with reasonable effort, ascertain and identify the place intended and distinguish it from other places in the community.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

WHEN IS A GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THETHINGS TO BE SEIZED ALLOWED?

A

UY v. BIR
- unregistered delivery receipts” and “unregistered purchase & sales invoices. It would be impractical to require the latter to specify each and every receipt and invoice, and the contents thereof, to the minutest detail.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

CAN A SEARCH WARRANT VOID BUT ONLY IN PART?

A

YES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

WHAT IS A GENERAL SCATTERSHOT WARRANT WARRANT?

A

TAMBASAN v. PEOPLE
- issuance of a search warrant for more than one specific offense. totally null and void.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

WHAT MUST THE JUDGE DO BEFORE THE ISSUANCE WARRANT?

A

RULE 126, SEC 5

  1. PERSONALLY EXAMINE complainant and witnesses through Q & A in writing and under oath.
  2. Attach through record SWORN STATEMENTS and AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

WHAT DO YOU MEAN QUESTIONS?

A

PEOPLE v. CHOI

Probing and exhaustive questions depend largely on the discretion of the judge. Not merely repetitious, routinary, or pro-forma but must make his own inquiry on the intent and justification of the application.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What happens if If the judge fails to determine probable cause by personally examining the applicant and his witnesses in the form of searching questions before issuing a search warrant?

A

GRAVE ABUSE OF DISCRETION is committed. (People v. Choi)

17
Q

WHEN MAY THE SEARCH WARRANT?

A

RULE 126.6
If the judge is SATISFIED of the existence of facts upon which the application is based

or that there is PROBABLE CAUSE to believe that they exist.

18
Q

WHAT ARE REQUIRED IN THEDETERMINATION OF THE EXISTENCE OF PROBABLE CAUSE?

A

People v. Choi

J-U-R

  1. JUDGE PERSONALLY EXAMINE THE COMPLAINANT AND WITNESSES
  2. EXAMINATION must be UNDER OATH
  3. EXAMINATION must be REDUCED IN WRITING (Q AND A)
19
Q

WHAT IS PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THEISSUANCE OF A SEARCH WARRANT?

A

SONY MUSIC V. ESPANOL

  • PROBABLE CAUSE MEANS facts and circumstances which would lead a reasonably DISCREET and PRUDENT MAN to believe that an offense has been committed and that the objects sought in connection with the offense are in the place to be searched
20
Q

WHAT IS PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THEISSUANCE OF A SEARCH WARRANT?

A

SONY MUSIC V. ESPANOL

  • PROBABLE CAUSE MEANS facts and circumstances which would lead a reasonably DISCREET and PRUDENT MAN to believe that an offense has been committed and that the objects sought in connection with the offense are in the place to be searched
21
Q

WHEN MAY AN OFFICER BREAK A DOOROR WINDOW?

A

RULE 126.7
- if refused admittance to the place of directedsearch after giving notice of his purpose and authority

  • to execute the warrant or liberate himself or any PERSON lawfully aiding him when unlawfully detained therein.
22
Q

WHO MUST BE PRESENT DURING THE SEARCH?

A

in the presence of the lawful occupant thereof or any member of his family or in the absence of the latter, two witnesses of sufficient age and discretion residing in the same locality. (R126, S8)

23
Q

CAN THE LAW AUTHORITIES SIMULTANEOUSLY SEARCH DIFFERENT ROOMS IN THE PRESENCE OF ONLY ONE WITNESS?

A

NO. This cannot be allowed because it defeats the purpose of having a witness.

QUINTERO V. NBI

24
Q

CAN A SECURITY GUARD BE CONSIDERED AS A LAWFUL OCCUPANT?

A

NO. a security guard may not be considered a “lawful occupant” or “a member of[the lawful occupant’s] family” under the earlier quoted Section 8 of Rule 126

(Sony v. Bright Future)

25
Q

CAN A SECURITY GUARD BE CONSIDERED AS A LAWFUL OCCUPANT?

A

NO. a security guard may not be considered a “lawful occupant” or “a member of[the lawful occupant’s] family” under the earlier quoted Section 8 of Rule 126

(Sony v. Bright Future)