Article 11 Flashcards
Imputability
quality by which an act may be ascribed to a person as its author or owner
Responsibility
obligation of suffering the consequences of the crime; penal and civil
Guilt is an element of responsibility
Imputability
v.
Responsibility
Imputability - a deed may be imputed to a person
Responsibility - person must take the consequence of such deed
Justifying Circumstances
Act of the person is in accordance with the law, so that person is deemed not to have transgressed the law and is free from BOTH criminal and civil liability, EXCEPT par. 4 (avoid evil or injury)
Quantum of Proof for Justifying
Clear and convincing evidence; strength of his own evidence, not weakness on prosecution
Requisites of self-defense
1) unlawful aggression (must come from the person who attacked the accused)
2) reasonable necessity of the means employed
3) lack of sufficient provocation on the part of the person defending himself
How to determine unlawful aggression
1) ACTUAL – actual physical force or actual use of weapon; we be assaulted/attacked; danger must be present
2) IMMINENT/THREAT* – we be threatened with an attack in an IMMEDIATE and IMMINENT manner; peril to one’s life, limb or right is either actual or imminent; danger (either death or bodily harm) is on the point of happening
* threat must be OFFENSIVE and POSITIVELY STRONG, showing the wrongful intent to cause an injury
Mere belief of an impending attack (oral threats)/threatening attitude is NOT SUFFICIENT
Should be simultaneous with the attack or without appreciable interval of time (no time for deliberation)
2 kinds of aggression
1) lawful
2) unlawful
Retaliation
v.
Self-defense
Retaliation - aggression that was begun by injured party already ceased to exist when the accused attacked him
Self-defense - aggression was still existing when the aggressor was inured or disabled by the person making a defense
What may belie claim of self-defense
1) Nature
2) Character
3) Location
4) Extent of wound
5) Improbability of deceased being the aggressor
Unlawful aggression in defense of other rights
1) Right to chastity
2) Defense of property*
3) Defense of home
*Can only be invoked ONLY when it is coupled with an ATTACK ON THE PERSON entrusted with said property
Threat
1) Offensive
2) Positively strong
3) Showing WRONGFUL INTENT to cause injury
Requisites of necessity of the means employed…
1) there is necessity of the course of action taken by the person making a defense
2) there is necessity of the means used
Both must be reasonable
- RATIONAL EQUIVALENCE in consideration of the ff:
1) emergency
2) immident danger
3) instict
Test of reasonableness of the means used
1) Nature
2) quality of weapon
3) physical condition
4) character
5) size
6) other circumstances (place and occasion of assault)
Reasonable to use a deadly weapon when..
1) no other available means
2) could not cooly choose the less deadly weapon to repel the assault
*liberally construed in FAVOR of law-abiding citizens