Article 11 Flashcards

1
Q

Imputability

A

quality by which an act may be ascribed to a person as its author or owner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Responsibility

A

obligation of suffering the consequences of the crime; penal and civil

Guilt is an element of responsibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Imputability
v.
Responsibility

A

Imputability - a deed may be imputed to a person

Responsibility - person must take the consequence of such deed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Justifying Circumstances

A

Act of the person is in accordance with the law, so that person is deemed not to have transgressed the law and is free from BOTH criminal and civil liability, EXCEPT par. 4 (avoid evil or injury)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Quantum of Proof for Justifying

A

Clear and convincing evidence; strength of his own evidence, not weakness on prosecution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Requisites of self-defense

A

1) unlawful aggression (must come from the person who attacked the accused)
2) reasonable necessity of the means employed
3) lack of sufficient provocation on the part of the person defending himself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How to determine unlawful aggression

A

1) ACTUAL – actual physical force or actual use of weapon; we be assaulted/attacked; danger must be present
2) IMMINENT/THREAT* – we be threatened with an attack in an IMMEDIATE and IMMINENT manner; peril to one’s life, limb or right is either actual or imminent; danger (either death or bodily harm) is on the point of happening
* threat must be OFFENSIVE and POSITIVELY STRONG, showing the wrongful intent to cause an injury

Mere belief of an impending attack (oral threats)/threatening attitude is NOT SUFFICIENT

Should be simultaneous with the attack or without appreciable interval of time (no time for deliberation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

2 kinds of aggression

A

1) lawful

2) unlawful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Retaliation
v.
Self-defense

A

Retaliation - aggression that was begun by injured party already ceased to exist when the accused attacked him

Self-defense - aggression was still existing when the aggressor was inured or disabled by the person making a defense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What may belie claim of self-defense

A

1) Nature
2) Character
3) Location
4) Extent of wound
5) Improbability of deceased being the aggressor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Unlawful aggression in defense of other rights

A

1) Right to chastity
2) Defense of property*
3) Defense of home

*Can only be invoked ONLY when it is coupled with an ATTACK ON THE PERSON entrusted with said property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Threat

A

1) Offensive
2) Positively strong
3) Showing WRONGFUL INTENT to cause injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Requisites of necessity of the means employed…

A

1) there is necessity of the course of action taken by the person making a defense
2) there is necessity of the means used

Both must be reasonable

  • RATIONAL EQUIVALENCE in consideration of the ff:
    1) emergency
    2) immident danger
    3) instict
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Test of reasonableness of the means used

A

1) Nature
2) quality of weapon
3) physical condition
4) character
5) size
6) other circumstances (place and occasion of assault)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Reasonable to use a deadly weapon when..

A

1) no other available means
2) could not cooly choose the less deadly weapon to repel the assault

*liberally construed in FAVOR of law-abiding citizens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Situations where 3rd requisite of self-defense is present

A

1) no provocation at all
2) if there was provocation, it is NOT sufficient
3) if provocation was sufficient, NOT given by the person defending himself
4) even if provocation was given by person defending himself, it was not PROXIMATE and IMMEDIATE to act of aggression

17
Q

How to determine sufficiency of provocation

A

PROPORTIONATE to the act of aggression and ADEQUATE to stir the aggressor to its commission

18
Q

Battered Woman Syndrome Cycle of Violence (no criminal and civil liability)

A

1) tension-building phase
2) acute battering incident
3) tranquil, loving phase

19
Q

battered woman

A

one who is repeatedly subject to any forceful physical or psychological behavior by a man in order to coerce her to do something he wants her to do without concern for her rights

20
Q

Requisites of defense of relatives

A

1) unlawful aggression
2) reasonable necessity of the means employed to prevent or repel it
3) IN CASE provocation was given by person attacked, the one making the defense had NO part therein

21
Q

Requisites of defense of a stranger

A

1) unlawful aggression
2) reasonable necessity of the means employed to prevent or repel it
3) The person defending be not induced by revenge, resentment, or other evil motive

22
Q

Damage to another covers:

A

1) injury to persons

2) damage to property

23
Q

Requisites of avoidance of an evil or injury

A

1) evil sought to be avoided actually exists
2) injury feared be greater than that done to avoid it
3) no other practical and less harmful means of preventing it

  • should not be because of negligence or imprudence
  • greater evil sought to be avoided should not result from violation of law
  • there is civil liability!!!
24
Q

Requisites of Fulfillment of Duty or Lawful exercise of right or office

A

1) Accused acted in performance of a duty or in lawful exercise of a right or office
2) Injury caused is the NECESSARY CONSEQUENCE OF DUE PERFORMANCE of duty or lawful EXERCISE of such right or office

*In Lawful exercise of a right, NOT NECESSARY that there be unlawful aggression against the person charged with the protection of the property!!!

25
Q

Requisites of obedience to order

A

1) an order is issued by superior
2) order must be for some lawful purpose
3) means used by subordinate to carry out said order is lawful

26
Q

Self defense for private individual v. duty of peace officer

A

Private individual: needs to prevent or repel aggression

Peace officer: REQUIRES him to OVERCOME his opponent