Article 11 (2)

Question 1

National security

Answer 1

Take counter-terrorism measures
Wider margin

Question 2

Prevention of crime or disorder

Answer 2

Cisse v France - protest shut down legitimately
Ollinger - fear public safety of confrontations
Pendragon v UK - s.144A public order act prevent gatherings around stonehenge

Question 3

Protect public health and morals

Answer 3

Larmela v Finland - didn’t acknowledge group due to public health
Friend & Countryside alliance - Ban on fox hunting moral to stop killing

Question 4

Protection of reputation or rights of others

Answer 4

Countryside alliance v AG - a.10 and 11 go hand in hand
Ollinger - protest would disrupt peace of others

Question 5

Handyside

Answer 5

Is there a pressing social need for the restriction
Does the restriction correspond to that need
If so, is the restriction a proportionate response to that need
Are the reasons given relevant and sufficient