Article 102 TFEU Flashcards
Question process (Art. 102)
Why Art. 102 is relevant Dominant position - RPM & RGM - Demand and Supply Substitutability - Market share Abuse -exploitative & anti-competitive Consequences
Role of Art. 102
Prohibits abuse of dominant position that may affect trade between Member States
Dominance
A position of economic strength (market power) which allows undertaking to prevent effect competition in relevant market.
(United Brands)
Test for dominance
Does undertakings economic strength allow it to behave independently of both its customers and competitors?
Relevant Product Market (RPM)
All the products/services regarded as interchangeable by the consumer
(United Brands)
Tests for RPM
Demand substitutability
- small but lasting increase in price of product A cause product As customers to switch to readily available substitute? (United Brands)
Supply substitutability
- could potential competitors switch to producing same product without incurring significant additional costs?
Hugin Kassaregister AB
RPM may be very narrow, such as spare parts for Hugin cash registers
Hoffman-La Roche
Often, very large market shares will be in themselves evidence of a dominant position
Akzo Chemie
Share of 50% or more raises rebuttable presumption of dominance.
Share of below 35% are rarely dominant
RGM
The area of the common market where the conditions of competition are homogenous (United Brands)
Factors to consider for RGM (United Brands)
Transportation costs
Shipment patterns
Product characteristics
Location of plants
Hilti AG
Start by assuming RGM is whole of EU
Sea Containers/Stena Sealink
RGM may be geographically very small (but must be economically substantial)
Other factors of dominance
Market shares of competitors are low in comparison
Barriers to entry
Undertaking in a strong position over a long period of time
Less likely if customers have buying power
Abuse
An abuse occurs when a dominant firm in a market engages in conduct that is intended to exploit its dominant position.
Presence of dominant firm weakens degree of competition