Article 10

Question 1

Little red school book

Answer 1

Handy side v uk

Question 2

Book denied holocaust no breech

Answer 2

Garaudy v France

Question 3

Refused to disclose his source despite winning a contempt of court order telling him to do so and being finned £5000 art 10 was breached because the publication of the material was already prohibited

Answer 3

Goodwin v uk

Question 4

Balances conflict with 8&10 criteria

Is info of general interest
Notoriety of person
Prior conduct of person
Method it was obtained and veracity
Severity of sanction

Answer 4

Axel v Germany

Question 5

Macdonald bought libel action against dependent who published leaflets about the food

Answer 5

Steel v Morris v uk

Question 6

Footballer extra marital affair

Answer 6

AvB Plc

Question 7

Exhibition of models made out of foetuses

Offence of outrageous public decency committed

Answer 7

Gibson v sylveire

Question 8

Film offending Catholicism in a large catholic area no violation the ban was justified

Answer 8

Otto-Preminger-institute Australia

Question 9

Chemical factory near where people lived production of fertiliser not told, no breech no obligation to collect and disseminate info

Answer 9

Guerrero v Italy

Question 10

Hungarian police refused access to info from a civil rights organisation

Scope of access

Only state held information
Only access in public interest
Those who access do so to contribute to public debate
Sensationalism is not valid right
If information is instrumental to individual exercise of his right to freedom of expression must be disclosed

Answer 10

Magyar v Hungary

Question 11

Former secret service man published his memoir case looks at necessary book already published

Answer 11

Observer and guardian v uk ( spy catcher case)

Question 12

Member of mI5 disclosed documents justified restriction in interest of national security

Answer 12

R v Shayler

Question 13

Co owned a weekly review published letters criticising turkey part in massacre in Kurdistan
Interference legitimate preventing dissorder or crime no violation

Answer 13

Surek v turkey

Question 14

Obscene artwork convicted of a crime no violation

State has a margin of appreciation in decision if restrictions necessary

Answer 14

Muller v Switzerland

Question 15

Applicant provided pregnant women with info about abortion in the uk
Restrictions violated

Answer 15

Open door v Ireland

Question 16

Published information about a notorious car accident while driver in process of prosecution
Journalist charged no violation necessary in a democratic society

Answer 16

Bedat v Switzerland

Question 17

Geriatric nurse dismissed spoke out about care

Answer 17

Heinrich v Germany

Question 18

Parents of deformed kids Sunday times published info on out of court offer regarding thalidomide high court granted an injunction
Was a violation

Answer 18

Sunday times v uk

Question 19

Turkey blocked all Google sites due to one site facing criminal proceedings insulting the former president
Was a violation

Answer 19

Yildrim v turkey

Question 20

Shipping company changing lorry route

No violation

Answer 20

Delfi v Estonia