Art. 3 What is a felony? Flashcards
What is a felony?
Act/ omission punishable by penal laws
Two ways of committing a felony
- ) Dolo- malice
2. ) Culpa- fault
When does one commit dolo?
Act is performed by deliberate intent
When does one commit culpa?
Wrongful act is a result of negligence, imprudence, lack of foresight, lack of skill
Requisites of committing a felony
- ) Produced in the external world
- ) Voluntary
- ) Punishable by (penal) law
Dolo is voluntary when there is:
- ) Freedom of will
- ) Intelligence
- ) Deliberate intent
Deliberate intent can be disproved by _______.
Mistake of fact
Requisites for mistake of fact to disprove CL
- ) Facts must be lawful if they were as the accused believed them to be
- ) Intent was lawful
- ) No carelessness/ fault in the mistake from the part of the accused
Exception to the exception of mistake of fact
- ) Done in bad faith
2. ) Done with negligence
Requisites for culpa:
- ) Freedom of will
- ) Intelligence
- ) Negligence, imprudence, lack of skill, lack of foresight
Acts/ omissions are not voluntary when they fall under ___________.
Art. 12. Circumstances which exempt from criminal liability.
There is no intelligence when:
Art. 12, para 1: Imbecile or an insane person (not in lucid intervals)
15-below 18
There is no freedom of will when:
Art. 12, para 5: Any person who acts in compulsion of an irresistible force
Art. 12, para 6: Any person who acts under the impulse of an uncontrollable fear of an equal or greater injury
There is no criminal liability for overt acts when done in ____.
Art. 11, para 1: “in defense of his persons or rights”
How is criminal intent established?
Criminal intent is presumed from the commission of an unlawful act.
Overt act/ means employed
What is motive?
Motive is the moving power which impels one to action for a definitive result.
What is the intent?
Intent is the purpose to use a particular means to effect results desired.
When is motive relevant?
- ) When the identity of a person accused of having committed a crime is in dispute.
- ) When there is doubt as to the identity of the assailant/
- ) In ascertaining the truth between two antagonistic theories or versions of the killing.
- ) Where the identification of the accused person proceeds from an unreliable source, and the testimony is inconclusive and not free from doubt.
- ) When there is no eyewitnesses to the crime, when suspicion is likely to fall upon an number of persons.
- ) In direct assaults, when the person in authority or his agent who is attacked or seriously intimidated is not the the actual performance of his actual duty.
- ) If the evidence is merely circumstantial.
How is motive established?
Testimonies of the witnesses/ statements made by the accused prior to the commission of the crime.
General intent vs special intent
General intent is established by the overt act/ means employed. It is presumed.
Special intent must be proven beyond reasonable doubt by the prosecution.
Mala in se
Crime is inherently evil. Intention is criminal, person is the menace. Has stages of commission. Governs most of the crimes enumerated in the RPC.
REQUIRES CRIMINAL INTENT
Mala prohibita
Evil by law. Intentional act is the crime. Punishable only when consummated.
DOES NOT REQUIRE CRIMINAL INTENT