Arson module Flashcards

1
Q

CA 1961

267(1)(a)

+ penalty

A

Arson- danger to life.
14 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Arson (danger to life) section

A

267(1)(a)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

267(1)(a) elements

A

-Intentionally or recklessly
-Damages by fire or by means of explosive
-Any property
-Knowing ir ought to know, that danger to life is likely to ensue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Def

Intent

A

A deliberate act to get a specifc result. The act must be a deliberate act and more than accidental or involuntary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Case law

Intent

A

R v Collister: Circumstantial evidence from which an offenders intent may be inferred are:
- words or actions before, during or after the event
- The circumstances surrounding the event
- The nature of the act itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Def

Recklessley

A

Consciously or deliberately taking an unjustified risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Case law

Recklessness (1)

A

Cameron v R
Recklessness is established if:
The defendant recognised that there was a real possibility that his/her actions would bring about the prescribed result and/or that the proscribed circumstances existed and having regard to that risk those actions were unreasonable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Case law

Recklessness (2)

A

R v Tipple
Knowing the relevant risk, the offender makes a deliberate decision to run the risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Def

Fire

A

A process of combustion, a chemical reaction between oxygen and fuel triggered by heat - all three must be present.
Oxygen + fuel + heat
It is not necessary that something is set alight and burnt - melting, blistering of paint or significant smoke damage is sufficient.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Def and case law

Damages by fire

A

Although fire damage will often involve burning or charring, it is not necessary that the property is actually set alight; melting, blistering of paint or significant smoke damage may be sufficient.

R v Archer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Case law

R v Archer

A

Damage includes permanent or temporary physical damage and/or permanent or temporary impairment of its use or value.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Proving recklessness

A
  1. That the defendant consciously and deliberately ran a risk (subjective)
  2. The the risk was one that was unreasonable to take in the circumstances as they were known to the defendant (obj. - would a reasonable person have taken the risk)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Def

Property

A

Section 2 CA 1961
Property includes any real or personal property and any estate or interest in any real or personal property, money, electricity, and any debt and anything in action, and any other right or interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Def

Life

A

Life in this context means human life, and the danger must be to the life of someone other than the defendant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Def

Explosive

Sec 2 Arms Act 1981

A

Any substance or mixture or combination of substances which in its normal state is capable either of decomposition at such a rapid rate as to result in an explosion or of producing a pyrotechnic effect.
Includes gun powder, gelignite, detonators
Does not include: firearms, fireworks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Def

Knows

A

Simester and Brookbanks: Knowing meants “knowing or correctly believing”. The defendant may believe something wrongly but they cannot know something that is false.

17
Q

Knows

Degree of knowledge

A
  1. Subjective - what was the defendant thinking at the time? Did the defendant know that human life was likely to be endangered by their actions?
  2. Objective - (if insufficient evidence they were conscious of the risk) what would a reasonable person have thought in the same circumstances? Would a reasonable person have recognised the risk?
18
Q

Def

Claim of right

A

Section 2 CA 1961
In relation to any act means a belief at the time of the act in a proprietary or possessory right in property to which the offence is alleged to have been committed, although that belief may be based on ignorance or mistake of fact or of any matter of law other than the enactment against which the offence is alleged to have been committed.

19
Q

COR

Nature of belief

A
  1. Belief in a proprietary or possessory right. Element of ownership or right to take or retain possession. Includes intangible property.
  2. Belief must be about rights to the property in question (involved in act). Taking or dealing with other property
20
Q

Def

Immovable property

A

Property currently fixed in place and unable to be moved, even though it may be possible to make it moveable.
(relates to buildings, land and things growing on land)

21
Q

Def

Vehicle

A

S2 LTA 1998
A contrivance equipped with wheels, tracks, or runners on which it can move AND includes a hovercraft, skateboard, skates and roller skates.
DNI - wheelchair, pram, trundler, lawnmower.

22
Q

Def

Ship

A

S2 CA 1961
Any description of vessel used in navigation, however propelled.

23
Q

Def

Aircraft

A

S2 Civil Aviation Act 1990
A machine that can derive support in the atmosphere from the reactions of the air

24
Q

Case law

Interest

A

R v Wilson
Tenancy constitutes an interest in property

Wilson was a meth cook whose CLAN lab exploded and burnt down his rental

25
Q

Def

Obtain

A

S217 CA 1961
Obtain, in relation to any person, means obtain or retain for himself or herself or for any other person.

26
Q

Def

Benefit

A

S267 CA 1961
Benefit means any benefit, pecuniary advantage, privilege, property, service or valuable consideration.

27
Q

Case law

Cause loss

A

R v Morley
Loss is assessed by the extent to which the complainant’s position prior to the offence has been diminished or impaired.

28
Q

Def

Person

A

S2 CA 1961
Includes not only real people but companies and other organisations.

29
Q

Section and penalty

Attempted Arson

A

268 CA 1961
10 years

30
Q

To be guilty of an attempt a person must:

A
  1. Intend to commit the offence
  2. Take a real and substantial step towards achieving that aim
31
Q
A