Arson CIB 012 Flashcards

1
Q

R v Harney

A

Recklessness involves the foresight of dangerous consequences that may well happen together with an intention to continue the course of conduct regardless of that risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

R v Archer

A

Property may be damaged if it suffers permanent or temporary physical harm or permanent or temporary impairment of its use or value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v Harpur

A

An attempt includes an act or ommission constituting a substantial step in a course of conduct planned to culminate in his commission of the crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Recklessness

A

Acting recklessly involves consciously and recklessly taking an unjustifiable risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Damages by Fire

A

Although fire damage will often involve burning or charring, it is not necessary that the property is actually set alight, melting, blistering or paint or significant smoke damage may be sufficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explosive S2 AA83

A

Means any substance or mixture or combustion of substances which in its normal state is capable of either decomposition at such rapid rate as to result in an explosion or of producing a pyrotechnic effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Property S2 CA61

A

Includes any real or personal property and any estate or interest in any real or personal property, money, electricity, and any debt and anything in action and any other right or interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Knows / ought to know

A

Knowing means correctly believing.. the defendant may believe something wrongly but cannot know something that is false.

Subjective / objective test to defendants degree of knowledge:

Subjective test:
- What was the defendant thinking at the time? Did the defendant know human life was likely to be endangered by his actions?

Objective Test:
- What would a reasonable person have thought in the circumstances? Would a reasonable person have recognised the risk?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Claim of right S2 CA61

A

In relation to any act, means a belief at the time of the act in a propietary or posessory right in property in relation to which the offence is alleged to have been committed, although that belief may be based on ignorance or mistake of fact or of any other matter of law other than the enactment against which the offence is believed to have been committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Immovable Property

A

Property is considered immovable if it is currently fixed in place and unable to be moved, even though it may be possible to make it movable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Vehicle, Ship, Aircraft

A

Vehicle:

Means a contrivance equipped with wheels. tracks or revolving runners on which it moves or is moved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Interest

A

Tenancy of a property constitutes an interest in it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Obtain S217 CA61

A

In relation to any person means to obtain or retain for himself, herself or any other person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Benefit S297(4) CA61

A

benefit means any benefit, pecuniary advantage, privilege, property, service or valuable consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Causes Loss

A

Involves financial detriment to the victim. It is not necessary that the victims loss results in any benefit to the offender.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Intent

A

A person intends to do an action if he wants to do that action, believes it is possible for him to achieve something he wants by doing that actions and behaves as he does because of his desire or belief.

R v Mohan - intent involves a decision to bring about, in so far as it lies within the accused power, the commission of an offence

R v Wakka - A fleeting or passing thought is not sufficient; there must be a firm intent to purpose to effect an act.