Arson Flashcards
Arson - Danger to Life Section 267(1)(a) Crimes Act 1961
- Intentionally or recklessly
- Damages by fire or by means of any explosive
- Any property
- If he or she knows or ought to know that danger to life is likely to ensue
Arson - No Personal Gain Section 267(1)(b) Crimes Act 1961
- Intentionally or recklessly
- Without claim of right
- Damages by fire or by means of any explosive
- Any immovable property, or any vehicle, ship or aircraft
- In which that person has no interest
Arson - Obtain Any Benefit Section 267(1)(c) Crimes Act 1961
- Intentionally
- Damages by fire or by means of any explosive
- Any immovable property, or any vehicle, ship or aircraft
- With intent to obtain any benefit,
- Or to cause loss to any person
Arson
Section 267, Subsections 2 & 3
2(a) - Intentionally or recklessly and without claim of right, damages by fire or by means of any explosive any property in which that person has no interest (other than property defined in subsection 1)
2(b) - Intentionally or recklessly damages by fire or by means of any explosive any property in which that person has no interest (other than property defined in subsection 1) with intent to obtain any benefit, with intent to cause loss to any other person
3 - Intentionally damages by fire or by means of any explosive any property with reckless disregard for the safety of any other property
Benefit
Any benefit, pecuniary advantage, privilege, property, service or valuable consideration
Intent
Deliberate Act - Specific Result
R v Collister
Intent inferred by the circumstances
Circumstantial Evidence for Intent
- The offenders actions and words before, during and after the event
- The surrounding circumstances
- The nature of the act itself
Recklessness
Acting recklessly involves consciously and deliberately taking an unjustifiable risk.
Recklessness is a test based on the defendants appreciation of the risk of the offence and their decision to run that risk anyway.
Cameron v R - Recklessness
Recklessness is established if: the defendant recognised that there was a real possibility that: his or her actions would bring about the proscribed result and/or that the proscribed circumstances existed and having regard to that risk those actions were unreasonable.
Cameron v R - Broken Down
Part A - subjective, requires the defendant has recognised the risk the offence anticipates as being possible.
Part B - subject and objective, if the actions of the defendant have no social utility, the running of any risk subjectively appreciated is unreasonable and thus reckless. Where there is some social utility in the actions of the defendant, whether those actions were unreasonable will depend on “whether a reasonable and prudent person would have taken the risk”.
R v Tipple - Recklessness
A deliberate decision to run the risk
Proving Recklessness
- That the defendant consciously and deliberately ran a risk
- That the risk was one that was unreasonable to take in the circumstances as they were know to the defendant
Damages by Fire or Explosive
Prosecution must prove that the specified property has been damaged by fire or explosive as a result of the defendants actions.
Although fire damage will often involve burning or charring, it is not necessary that the property is actually set alight; melting, blistering of paint, or significant smoke damage may be sufficient.
R v Archer - Damage
Property may be damaged if it suffers permanent or temporary physical harm or permanent or temporary impairment of its use or value.