ARGUMENTS FOR GOD'S EXISTENCE Flashcards

1
Q

What is the focus of Aquinas’s Cosmological Argument?

A

To explain the key elements and evaluate its effectiveness in proving God’s existence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How many arguments for God’s existence did Aquinas suggest?

A

Five arguments known as The Five Ways.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does cosmology study?

A

The universe.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the third way in Aquinas’s Cosmological Argument?

A

Observation that all things in the universe are contingent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does the term ‘contingent’ refer to in the context of Aquinas’s argument?

A

Things that are moved, changed, and caused, which need not exist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What conclusion does Aquinas draw from the observation of contingent things?

A

Something must exist necessarily.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the implication of everything being contingent?

A

The universe must depend on something outside of it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does the Cosmological Argument suggest about the external reason for existence?

A

It must itself be necessary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the first premise (P1) of Aquinas’s Cosmological Argument?

A

Everything can exist or not-exist; everything in the natural world is contingent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the second premise (P2) of Aquinas’s Cosmological Argument?

A

If everything is contingent, then at some time there would be nothing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does premise (P3) state about nothing coming from nothing?

A

If there was once nothing, then nothing could have come from nothing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What conclusion (C1) follows from the premises regarding necessary existence?

A

Something must exist necessarily, otherwise nothing would now exist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does premise (P4) state about necessary beings?

A

Everything necessary must either be caused or uncaused.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does premise (P5) indicate about the series of necessary beings?

A

The series cannot be infinite, or there would be no explanation of that series.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the conclusion (C2) regarding uncaused beings?

A

There must be some uncaused being which exists of its own necessity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does conclusion (C3) suggest about our understanding of God?

A

By this, we all understand God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Is the Cosmological Argument more, less, or equally persuasive compared to the Ontological Argument?

A

This is a point for discussion.

18
Q

What type of argument is the Cosmological Argument?

A

It is a posteriori argument.

19
Q

What should be evaluated regarding the strengths and weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument?

A

Consider its effectiveness compared to the Ontological Argument.

20
Q

What is the significance of Aristotle in relation to Aquinas’s argument?

A

Aquinas was influenced by Aristotle’s concept of the Prime Mover.

21
Q

What does the term ‘necessary existence’ refer to?

A

Existence that does not depend on anything else.

22
Q

What was one of Russell’s key criticisms of the Cosmological Argument?

A

Aquinas is guilty of the fallacy of composition

23
Q

What example does Russell use to illustrate the fallacy of composition?

A

‘Just because every man has a mother does not mean that the human race has a mother.’

24
Q

According to Russell, what can be said about a necessary being?

A

There can be no such thing as a necessary being; existence is not a predicate.

25
Q

How does Russell describe the universe?

A

A ‘brute fact’ that cannot be explained

26
Q

What is one of Hume’s criticisms regarding existence?

A

Existence has to be proved; statements should be synthetic.

27
Q

What does Hume suggest about the universe’s necessity?

A

The universe could be necessary, using Ockham’s Razor.

28
Q

What is the concept of infinite regress in Hume’s argument?

A

There could be infinite regress in causation.

29
Q

If God is the cause, what question does Hume raise?

A

What caused God?

30
Q

What does Hume argue regarding the nature of God?

A

Even if God was necessary, he may not be the God of Classical Theism.

31
Q

What could our perception of cause and effect be, according to Hume?

A

An illusion

32
Q

What key characteristics define the Design Argument?

A

It is ‘a posteriori’, inductive and argues that God’s existence is synthetic.

‘A posteriori’ means it is based on experience; ‘inductive’ refers to drawing general conclusions from specific instances.

33
Q

What analogy does Paley use to explain his Design Argument?

A

If we found a watch on a heath, we would observe complexity, purpose, and regularity, leading us to assume design and hence a designer.

This analogy suggests that just as a watch has a designer, so does nature.

34
Q

What attributes of nature does Paley highlight to support his argument?

A
  • Purpose (e.g., birds have wings to fly)
  • Regularity (e.g., planets orbit in regular motion)

These attributes suggest that nature, like a watch, indicates the presence of a designer.

35
Q

What conclusion does Paley reach from his Design Argument?

A

The world has a designer - God.

This conclusion is based on the perceived complexity and order in the natural world.

36
Q

Is ‘God exists’ a synthetic or analytic statement?

A

Synthetic.

A synthetic statement is one that requires empirical evidence for validation.

37
Q

What is the alternative name for the Design Argument?

A

The Teleological Argument.

‘Teleological’ derives from ‘telos’, meaning purpose or design.

38
Q

What year did David Hume write his arguments?

A

1779 (before Paley’s design argument)

This year is significant in understanding the historical context of Hume’s philosophical contributions.

39
Q

What were David Hume’s arguments?

A
  • Might not be the God of CT
  • He compared the world to a vegetable rather than a machine
  • Could have just been random particles colliding and eventually forming order
40
Q

Other potential arguments?

A
  • It can be argued that the world is imperfect, suggesting an imperfect creator
  • The world is flawed