Argument Types Flashcards
Author improperly equates a percentage with a definite quantity, or when an author uses quantity information to make a judgment about the percentage represented by that quantity
Numbers and Percentages Errors
Assumes that conditions will remain constant overtime, and that what was the case in the past continues in the present and will be the case in the future
Time Shift Errors
Straw Man
The author attempts to attack an opponent’s position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts and refashions the argument, making it weaker in the process
Authors misuse information to such a degree that they fail to provide any information to support their conclusion or they provide information that is irrelevant to their conclusion
General Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements
Internal Contradiction
Assumes that only two courses of action are available when there may be others
-do not confuse a false dilemma with a situation where the author legitimately establishes that only two possibilities exist
False Dilemma
Method of Reasoning
Ask you to describe, in abstract terms, the way in which the author made his or her argument
Ex.:”Which one of the following describes the technique of reasoning used above?
Survey Errors
- The survey uses a biased sample
- The survey questions are improperly constructed
- Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses
Occurs when the author uses an analogy that is too dissimilar to the original situation to be applicable
False Analogy
Ask you to identify the answer choice that cannot be true or is most weakened based on the information in the stimulus
Ex.: “If the statements above are true, which one of the following CANNOT be true?”
Cannot be True
Internal Contradiction
Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements
Error of Conditional Reasoning
Author mistakes a necessary condition for a sufficient condition, or mistakes a sufficient condition for a necessary condition
- Mistaken Negation
- Mistaken Reversal
Cannot be True
Ask you to identify the answer choice that cannot be true or is most weakened based on the information in the stimulus
Ex.: “If the statements above are true, which one of the following CANNOT be true?”
Parallel Reasoning
Ask you to identify the answer choice that contains reasoning most similar in structure to the reasoning presented in the stimulus
Ex.:”which one of the following arguments is most similar in its pattern of reasoning to the argument above?”
- Lack of evidence for a position is taken to prove that position is false
- Lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true
- Some evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is false
- Some evidence for a position is taken to prove that position is true
Errors in the Use of Evidence
Appeal to Emotion
Occurs when emotion or emotionally charged language is used in an attempt to persuade the reader
Ask you to describe, in abstract terms, the error of reasoning committed by the author
Ex.:”The reasoning in the astronomer’s argument is flawed because this argument…”
Flaw in the Reasoning
Require you to identify a point of contention between two speakers, and thus these questions appear almost exclusively with two-speaker stimuli
Ex.:”Larson and Manuela disagree about whether”
Point at Issue
Error of Composition
An error of composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group or entity to the group or entity as a whole or to each member of the group
Time Shift Errors
Assumes that conditions will remain constant overtime, and that what was the case in the past continues in the present and will be the case in the future
Author mistakes a necessary condition for a sufficient condition, or mistakes a sufficient condition for a necessary condition
- Mistaken Negation
- Mistaken Reversal
Error of Conditional Reasoning
Point at Issue
Require you to identify a point of contention between two speakers, and thus these questions appear almost exclusively with two-speaker stimuli
Ex.:”Larson and Manuela disagree about whether”
Circular Reasoning
The premise supports the conclusion, but the conclusion equally supports the premise
- author assumes as true what is supposed to be proved
Ask you to identify an assumption of the authors argument
Ex.:”Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument above?”
Assumption
Takes a small number of instances and treats those instances as if they support a broad, sweeping conclusion
Exceptional Case/ Overgeneralization
• Must be true questions ask you to identify the answer choice that is best proven by the information in the stimulus
Must be True/ Most Supported