Argument Forms Flashcards

1
Q

What is the difference between a deductive argument and an inductive argument?

A

A deductive argument: the claims provided prove with absolute certainty that the conclusion must be true (no room for doubt) and the strength of a deductive argument is measured by validity.
An inductive argument makes claims that do not ensure the truth of its conclusions but give us good reason to (measured in strength)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

P

A

P is the Antecedent: In the conditional statement “If P then Q,” the part represented by P is called the antecedent. This is the condition or event that is stated to be true or assumed to be true for the consequent to follow.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Q

A

Q is the Consequent: In the same statement, Q represents the consequent. It is the result or outcome that is claimed to occur if the condition P is met.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

P is a sufficient condition for Q

A

This means that if P is true, then Q must also be true. In other words, the occurrence of P alone is enough to guarantee the occurrence of Q.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Q is a necessary condition for P

A

This indicates that for P to be true, Q must also be true. Q is essential or required for the occurrence of P.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Conditional Statement Example

A

For example, consider the statement: “If it rains (P), then the ground is wet (Q).”

P (it rains) is the antecedent.
Q (the ground is wet) is the consequent.
If it rains (P), it is sufficient to make the ground wet (Q).
Conversely, if the ground is wet (Q), it is necessary that it has rained (P).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Modus Ponens

A

If P then Q
P
Therefore, Q

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Modus Tollens

A

If P then Q
Not-Q
Therefore, Not-P

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Affirming the Consequent (Fallacy)

A

If P then Q
Q
Therefore, P

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Denying the Antecedent

A

If P then Q
Not-P
Therefore Not-Q

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Inclusive-or? Exclusive-or?

A

When in doubt, assume it is an inclusive or

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Validity

A

An argument is valid if and only if it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false. This means that the conclusion follows logically from the premises. However, validity does not necessarily depend on the truth of the premises or the conclusion; it only concerns the structure of the argument.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Disjunctive Syllogism

A

P or Q
Not-P
Therefore Q

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Eliminative Fallacy/Syllogism

A

P or Q
P
Therefore, not Q

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly