Approaches: Origins of psychology Flashcards

1
Q

What is a psychology?

A

The scientific study of the human mind and its functions, especially those functions affecting behaviour in a given context.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was William Wundt’s contribution to psychology?

A
  • He developed the first experimental psychology lab in Germany in 1879.
  • Used scientific method to study the structure of sensation and perception.
  • Showed that introspection could be used to study mental states in replicable laboratory experiments.
  • He was known as the father of psychology.
  • He paved the way for future psychologies such as the cognitive approach.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is introspection?

A

The process by which a person gains knowledge about his or her own mental states as a result of the examination or observation of their own conscious thoughts and feelings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does structuralism mean?

A

Isolating the structure of consciousness by objectively breaking down thoughts about a stimulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does empiricism mean?

A

The belief is that all knowledge is derived from sensory experience. It is generally characterised by the use of the scientific method in psychology.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was Wundts procedure of introspection?

A

For example, in Wundts studies of perception, participants would be presented with carefully controlled stimuli. They would then be asked to provide a description of the inner processes they were experiencing as they looked at the image or listened to the tone. They made it possible to compare different ppts reports in response to the same stimuli and so establish general theories about perception and other mental processes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are some problems with introspection?

A
  • Doesn’t explain how the mind works.
  • Relies on people describing their thoughts and feelings, which usually isn’t objective.
  • Doesn’t provide data which can be used reliably because people are reporting on their experiences, their accounts cannot be confirmed.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the strengths of introspection?

A
  • Introspection can help people make connections between different experiences and responses.
  • Introspection in controlled conditions allows experiments to be replicated.
  • Introspection provides the only method to access our conscious thoughts and feelings.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the scientific method?

A

Refers to the use of investigative methods that are objective, systematic and replicable and the formulation, testing and modification of hypotheses based on these methods.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is replicability

A

Finding the same results when the same methodology is used.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is objectivity?

A

When findings/facts are not influenced by personal feelings or bias.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How can the introspection method be classed as scientific?

A
  • The same standardised procedures were given to all participants so the procedure could be replicated.
  • Wundt strictly controlled the environments where introspection took place.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the timeline of the emergence of psychology?

A
  • 1870s is structuralism
  • 1900s is psychoanalysis
  • 1910s is behaviourism
  • 1950s is humanistic
  • 1960s is cognitive/ SLT
  • 1980s is biological
  • 2000s is cognitive neuroscience
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A03 of the origins of psychology: Introspection

A

+ Introspection is that it still used in modern scientific psychology.
+ Scientific nature
- Wundt’s methods are unreliable
- The introspection is not approach is not particularly accurate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

A03: Introspection is that it still used in modern scientific psychology.

A

A strength of introspection is that it is still used in modern scientific psychology. Hunter used introspective methods to measure the levels of happiness among teenagers giving them bleepers which went off at random times throughout the day, prompting the teenagers to write down their thoughts and feelings prior to the beep. Despite the fact that introspection fell out of favour as a research tool, it has not been entirely abandoned and Hunters’ study suggests that introspection still has a role to play today.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A03: Scientific nature

A

Wundt tried to apply the scientific method to his studies. For example, controlling the environment where he conducted his introspection experiments would prevent this extraneous variable from skewing the results. Further, training subjects to adopt the same state of mind and report back specific data should, in theory, produce more reliable results.

17
Q

A03: Wundt’s methods are unreliable

A

A criticism of the structuralist approach, mainly from the behaviourists, was that this approach relied primarily on non-observable responses. Although participants could report their own conscious experiences, the processes themselves e.g memory was considered non-observable constructions. Wundt’s approach ultimately failed because of the lack of reliability of his methods. Introspective experimental results were not reliably reproducible by the other researchers in other labs. In contrast, other researchers were already achieving reliable results like Pavlov.

18
Q

A03: Introspection is not approach is not particularly accurate

A

The criticism of inspection according to Nisbett and Wilson is that is not particularly accurate as we have little knowledge of the causes of behaviour and attitudes. Nisbett and Wilson found that their participants were unaware of the factors that influenced their choice of consumer item. This suggests that Wundt’s approach lacks accuracy as our attitudes exist outside of our conscious awareness and therefore inspection would not uncover them