Approaches Flashcards
WUNDT and introspection
aim to document and describe the nature of human consciousness = INTROSPECTION
systematic reporting of an experience or object
focus on everydat obejct and look inwards to feeelings and images
breaking consciousness down - structuralism
used strict control conditions using the same stimulus - standardized instructions = replicable
what is introspection
- systematic analysis of ones own conscious experiences
-experiences are analyzed by breaking down into component parts (structalism) into thoughts, images and sensations
-people are trained to make data collected objective rather than subjective - people are presented with standardized events and asked to report their reactions
WATSON
questioned introspection - produced data that was subjective & varied greatly from person to person = difficult to establish basic principles (vague)
private mental thoughts cant be measured or observed
= BEHAVIOURIST APPROACH (emergence of psych as a science)
BEHAVIORIST assumptions
only studies behavior that can be observed and measured
- behavior is learnt form the environment
- animals and humans behave in the same way (animals can be used in research)
- scientific = use lab experiments
- CLASSICAL conditioning & OPERANT conditioning
BEHAVIORIST - classical conditioning
learning by association
dogs could be conditioned to salivate at the sound of a bell if that sound was repeatedly presented at the same time that they were given food.
PAVLOVS
food (unconditioned stimulus) - salivation (unconditioned response)
- bell (neutral stimulus) = no response
- Bell & food = salivation
- bell (conditioned stimulus) = salivation (conditioned response) ASSOCIATION
reflex response - immediate
BEHAVIORIST - operant conditioning
learning by consequence & an active process
3 types of consequences: positive reinforcement, (offering a reward)
negative reinforcement, (removing something unpleasant being taken away)
positive punishment (receiving something unpleasant)
negative punishment (removing something desirable)
SKINNER
rat in cage, pushed a lever it was positively reinforced by receiving food
learnt to go straight to the lever once put in the box
= positive reinforcement increases likely hood of behavior being repeated
STRENGHTS OF BEHAVIOURSIT APPROACH
application
increase our understanding of causes of phobias and attachment. improves therapy -
patients font have to think about their problems
token economy - positive reinforcement (earn tokens for privileges
STRENGHTS OF BEHAVIOURSIT APPROACH
experimental support
Pavlov showed that classical conditioning leads to learning by association.
Watson phobias can be learnt through classical conditioning in the “little Albert” experiment.
= increases validity
STRENGHTS OF BEHAVIOURSIT APPROACH
scientific
introduced the scientific methods to psychology. Laboratory experiments = high control of extraneous variables
= replicable & data obtained was objective
=psychology more credibility.
WEAKNESSES OF BEHAVIOURSIT APPROACH
animal studies
experiments were done on animals
humans are different cognitively and physiologically
humans have different social norms and moral values =we might behave differently from animals
= apply more to animals than to humans.
WEAKNESSES OF BEHAVIOURSIT APPROACH
free will
It sees people as passive in their learning with little conscious thoughts influencing their behavior (compared to other approaches)
free will ?`
SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY & BANDURA
assumptions
learn through observation and imitation of role model behavior ( some similar to ourselves; gender, age)
behaviorist + focuses on mental processes
people are active manipulators of environment
study humans rather than animals
SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY & BANDURA
explain meditational processes
Mediational processes are cognitive factors that influence learning and come between stimulus and response.
MODELLING=
-attention
-retention
- motor reproduction
-motivation
SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY & BANDURA
Bobo the doll
lab experiment.
Sample: American children, 72 children ages 3-6
group 1: aggressive behavior to the doll
group 2 : non aggressive behavior to the doll
group 3 : control group
-> taken to a room to play with the same doll and different toys
SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY & BANDURA
Bobo the doll - RESULTS
observed the aggressive model (group 1) were more aggressive than the children from the other two groups.
Imitated specific aggressive acts that were displayed by the model
Boys imitated more physically aggressive acts than girls
= SUPPORTS SLT
SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY
behavior from a role model is observed
(if its worth intimidating = identification)
behavior is intimidated ( needs self efficacy)
behavior is reinforced (direct or vicarious)
behavior is repeated
behavior is internalized into repertoire of behavior
SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY
reinforcment
direct: you are being rewarded
vicarious: model is rewarded for behavior
= more likely to repeat behavior
+ needs the belied that they can reproduce the behavior
SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY WEAKNESSES
lab + bobo
these were laboratory experiments and the task did not reflect the way the participants behave in their normal life.
lacks ecological validity
SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY STRENGHT
cultural differences
SLT can explain the difference of behavior between different cultures as if a behavior is not displayed it cannot be imitated, this can explain why groups such as the Amish are non-violent.
SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY STRENGHT
cognitive
It is a more complete explanation of human behavior than conditioning as it takes into account cognitive factors in learning.
COGNTIIVE APPROACHES
assumptions
how mental processes affect our behaviour
internal mental processes cant be observed directly but can infer based on how they act
role of schemas
computer science analogies - how we process information (input, store and retrieves)
combining cognitive processes and biological structures via cognitiveneuroscience
COGNTIIVE APPROACHES
role of schemas
a mental framework of beliefs and expectations developed from experiences. gets more detailed as get older
- help us organise and interpret information (quickly and effectively , prevent us being overwhelmed
BUT can lead to distortion, select schemas that may not be relevant
COGNTIIVE APPROACHES
cognitive neuroscience
scientific study of the influence of brain structure and chemistry that are responsivke for cognitive processes
use of brain scans and compare gainst neurotypical individuals
locate physicsal basis of cognitive processes in brain
STRENGTH OF COGNITIVE APPROACH
scientific method
lab experiments are controlled and replicable = results are reliable
scans are objective
STRENGTH OF COGNITIVE APPROACH
applications
useful and wide applications
used to explain eyewitness memories of events can be distorted
understand the causes of depression - proposes a therapy CBT