Approach to peripheral lung nodule Flashcards

1
Q

Risk of malignancy with fleischner solid nodule < 6 mm

A

< 1%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Risk of malignancy with fleischner solid nodule 6-8 mm

A

2%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Risk of malignancy with fleischner solid nodule > 8 mm

A

3% at 8mm and increases from there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Risk of malignancy with lung rads 1

A

< 1 %

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Risk of malignancy with lung rads 2

A

< 1%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Risk of malignancy with lung rads 3

A

1-2%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Risk of malignancy with lung rads 4A

A

5-15%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Risk of malignancy with lung rads 4B

A

> 15%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Radiographic size most associated with malignancy

A

> 2 cm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Radiographic nodule types and risk of malignancy

A

Solid > part solid > GG

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Radiographic nodule number and risk of malignancy

A

1-4 increased risk to single nodule

> 5 nodules decreases risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Radiographic location of nodule associated with more malignancy risk

A

Upper lobe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Spiculated or smooth edges of nodule more associated with malignancy?

A

Spiculated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Emphysema more or less suggestive of malignancy for a nodule

A

More

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

7 other characteristics that increase risk a nodule is malignant

A

Advanced age

Female

Prior history of malignancy

Smoking (35x increase)

Pseudocavitation

Vascular Convergance

Pleural retraction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Risk calculator used for incidental nodules

A

Mayo

17
Q

Risk calculator used for screening found nodules

A

Brock

18
Q

SUV value on PET associated with increased malignancy risk

A

2 - 2.5

19
Q

4 causes of false negative on PET

A

Small nodule < 8 mm

GG or subsolid nodules

Slow growing adenocarcinomas

Carcinoids

20
Q

Study that showed 40% fewer procedures would be performed with liquid biopsy use

A

PANOPTIC in chest 2018

21
Q

4 calcification patterns associated with benign nodules

A

Popcorn

Fully

Laminated

Central

22
Q

2 calcification patterns that suggest a nodule is malignant

A

Eccentric

Speckled

23
Q

Average yield of BAL for malignancy

A

19%

24
Q

Average yield of Brush for malignancy

A

38%

25
Q

Average yield of TBBx for malignancy

A

43%

26
Q

Average yield of TBNA for malignancy

A

47%

27
Q

Is needle or forceps better for malignancy

A

needle

28
Q

Is needle or forceps better for benign lesions

A

forceps

29
Q

Registry that showed sensitivity of the various biopsy modalities

A

ACQuIRE registry

AJRCCM 2016

30
Q

Yield of biopsy with EBUS alone

A

57%

31
Q

Yield of biopsy with EMN alone

A

38%

32
Q

Yield of biopsy with EMN and REBUS combined

A

47%

33
Q

Study that showed EMN yield to be as high as 73%

A

NAVIGATE trial

JTO 2019

34
Q

Study that showed robot superior to other modalities for biopsy

A

PRECISION-1 study

CHEST 2020

35
Q

Yield of robotic bronchoscopy in PRECISION-1 trial

A

80%

36
Q

Study that showed segmental atelectasis in lower lobe segments with bronchoscopy and difficulty to distinguish on REBUS

A

I-LOCATE trial

Chest 2020

37
Q

Trial that showed recruitment maneuvers and higher peep decreased atelectasis

A

VESPA

Chest 2022