Approach to peripheral lung nodule Flashcards

1
Q

Risk of malignancy with fleischner solid nodule < 6 mm

A

< 1%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Risk of malignancy with fleischner solid nodule 6-8 mm

A

2%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Risk of malignancy with fleischner solid nodule > 8 mm

A

3% at 8mm and increases from there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Risk of malignancy with lung rads 1

A

< 1 %

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Risk of malignancy with lung rads 2

A

< 1%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Risk of malignancy with lung rads 3

A

1-2%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Risk of malignancy with lung rads 4A

A

5-15%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Risk of malignancy with lung rads 4B

A

> 15%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Radiographic size most associated with malignancy

A

> 2 cm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Radiographic nodule types and risk of malignancy

A

Solid > part solid > GG

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Radiographic nodule number and risk of malignancy

A

1-4 increased risk to single nodule

> 5 nodules decreases risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Radiographic location of nodule associated with more malignancy risk

A

Upper lobe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Spiculated or smooth edges of nodule more associated with malignancy?

A

Spiculated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Emphysema more or less suggestive of malignancy for a nodule

A

More

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

7 other characteristics that increase risk a nodule is malignant

A

Advanced age

Female

Prior history of malignancy

Smoking (35x increase)

Pseudocavitation

Vascular Convergance

Pleural retraction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Risk calculator used for incidental nodules

17
Q

Risk calculator used for screening found nodules

18
Q

SUV value on PET associated with increased malignancy risk

19
Q

4 causes of false negative on PET

A

Small nodule < 8 mm

GG or subsolid nodules

Slow growing adenocarcinomas

Carcinoids

20
Q

Study that showed 40% fewer procedures would be performed with liquid biopsy use

A

PANOPTIC in chest 2018

21
Q

4 calcification patterns associated with benign nodules

A

Popcorn

Fully

Laminated

Central

22
Q

2 calcification patterns that suggest a nodule is malignant

A

Eccentric

Speckled

23
Q

Average yield of BAL for malignancy

24
Q

Average yield of Brush for malignancy

25
Average yield of TBBx for malignancy
43%
26
Average yield of TBNA for malignancy
47%
27
Is needle or forceps better for malignancy
needle
28
Is needle or forceps better for benign lesions
forceps
29
Registry that showed sensitivity of the various biopsy modalities
ACQuIRE registry AJRCCM 2016
30
Yield of biopsy with EBUS alone
57%
31
Yield of biopsy with EMN alone
38%
32
Yield of biopsy with EMN and REBUS combined
47%
33
Study that showed EMN yield to be as high as 73%
NAVIGATE trial JTO 2019
34
Study that showed robot superior to other modalities for biopsy
PRECISION-1 study CHEST 2020
35
Yield of robotic bronchoscopy in PRECISION-1 trial
80%
36
Study that showed segmental atelectasis in lower lobe segments with bronchoscopy and difficulty to distinguish on REBUS
I-LOCATE trial Chest 2020
37
Trial that showed recruitment maneuvers and higher peep decreased atelectasis
VESPA Chest 2022