Appendicular fracture repair Flashcards
Approach to fracture management
Establish the location and the nature of the fracture
Fracture assessment
List all possible methods of fracture repair
Weigh up advantages and disadvantages of each method
Establish best options
Fracture classification
- Cause of fracture
- Communication with external environment
- Extent of bony damage
- Number and position of fragments
- Direction of fracture lines
- Location
- Forces acting on the fracture/displacement
- Stability
- Degree of complexity and involvement of other tissues
- Age
Forces acting on transverse fractures
Shear +
Compression +++
Forces acting on oblique/spiral fractures
Bending +
Torsion +
High risk fractures based on biologic fracture assessment
Old patient
Poor health
Poor soft tissue envelope
Cortical bone
High velocity injury
Extensive approach
Mechanical fracture assessment
Caution:
- butress fracture
- multiple limb injury
- giant breed
In the middle:
- contact fracture
- pre-existing clinical disease
- large dog
Little risk:
- compression fracture
- single limb
- toy dog
High risk fractures according to clinical fracture assessment
Poor client compliance
Poor patient compliance
Wimp
High comfort level required
Aim of diaphyseal fracture repair
To repair it with as simple and as reliable a method as possible.
Articular fractures
Disruption of the articular surface will inevitably lead to some degree of degenerative change
Goal of surgery is to slow the onset/progression of arthritis, and reduce the impact on quality of life
Principles of articular fracture repair
Perfect reduction of the articular surface
Use rigid internal fixation
And interfragmentary compression of the fracture gap - using lag screws (+/- plates)
Early mobilisation and use of the joint is important to minimise stiffness.
Avulsion fractures
An avulsion fracture is where a fragment of bone is pulled away at the ligamentous or tendinous attachment.
Accurate anatomical reduction of the fracture
Rigid internal fixation (beware can be tiny fragments)
Implants must resist the tensile forces that caused the fracture in the first place
Principles of avulsion fracture repair
Counteract active distracting forces and convert them into compressive forces using the tension band principle.
Humeral diaphyseal fractures
Frequently distal half to third
Cast fixation not appropriate (upper limb)
IM pin fixation can be used but the bone narrows significantly distally restricting the size of pin that can be used. In dogs the IM pin should be angled so it sits in the medial epicondylar ridge.
Plate fixation is often an appropriate choice but both the surgical approach and the shape of the bone do not make this an easy option. Tension side of the humerus is the cranial or lateral. However applying a plate on the medial surface is acceptable practice.
ESF fixation should be avoided in the upper limb if a simpler option is appropriate
Radial diaphyseal fractures
Distal diaphyseal fractures are most common.
Surgical approaches – medial or lateral.
External coaptation is suitable for simple fractures with stability and good apposition of fracture ends.
IM pins and interlocking nails are NOT suitable as there is no safe area for placement of these implants that will not cause damage to the articular surfaces.
Plate and screw repair on the cranial or medial aspect is best for simple fractures.
In large dogs it may be necessary or preferable to plate both the radius and ulna.
If fracture is comminuted then ESF should be considered, although placement of pins in the radius, which is quite a narrow bone, can be a frustrating job. Consider a type Ib ESF construct (2 unilateral frames)
Distal Radial and Ulna Fractures – metaphyseal or epiphyseal
Fractures proximal to the growth plate are common especially in small or toy breeds of dog.
These fractures are prone to non-union, most commonly atrophic, if treated sub-optimally.
External coaptation is not advised.
Rigid stabilisation with ORIF using a bone plate and screws is recommended or use of external skeletal fixation may also be suitable.
Short plates risk implant related fracture due to ‘stress-riser’ effect.
Risk of osteopenia of the bone underneath plate, leading to secondary fractures.