Appeals and Preclusion Flashcards
Final Judgment
Judicial Act disposing of the entire case
when entered there is nothing left for court to address
If any matters remain, judgment was not final
Grounds for Jurisdiction for Court of Appeals
Review of
1. Final Judgment
2. order pertaining to preliminary injunctive relief
3. order pertaining to certification of a class
4. order that has been certified by the district court
5. a collateral order
[2-5 are referred to as interlocutory orders as issued during pendency]
Certified Order Conditions
- order involves controlling question of law
- issue of law where there is substantial difference of opinion
- immediate appeal will materially advance ultimate resolution of action
Collateral Order Conditions
- Order pertains to a matter unrelated to the merits
- order conclusively decides a particular issue
- delaying appeal until final judgement will effectively deny appellate review of the issue
De Novo Review
Appellant claims lower court made an error assessing the law
Appellate court grants no deference to the lower court
addresses legal issue as if it has never been addressed
Appeal based on Questions of Fact
reversal if error was clearly erroneous
Review of Inherently Discretionary Questions
Reviewed with abuse of discretion standard
no reasonable judge could have reached same decision
Harmless Error
court may affirm lower court decision if error did not affect result
Waiver
Failure to challenge the decision at the time the lower court made it
will waive right to challenge the issue on appeal
Appellate Procedure
notice of appeal must be filed in district court within 30 days of judgment or order that is subject of appeal
Except - class certification - 14 days
Res Judicata - Claim Preclusion
bars re-litigation of issue already decided
- same parties - same position in prior suit
- same transaction or occurrence as prior suit
- valid final judgment on the merits
When judgment is NOT on the merits
dismissal for lack of PJ, SMJ, or Venue
All other dismissals are on the merits
Collateral Estoppel - Issue Preclusion - Defined
bars re-litigation of issues in cases not involving same parties
- issue must have been litigated and subject to judicial resolution
- issue was essential to judgement - merits issue - and if decided the opposite way would have changed the outcome
- prior suit ended in a valid final judgment on the merits
- party against whom preclusion is sought had a full and fair opportunity and incentive to litigate the issue in the first suit