Appeals Flashcards

1
Q

is there a right to appeal?

A

no, permission must be obtained.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how can parties apply for permission?

A
  • Parties can make an oral application for permission at the end of the hearing. If this is refused or not done, a written application can be made.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how is a written application for permission usually dealt with?

A

o Written application is usually dealt with on paper (i.e. without a hearing)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the position regarding permission hearings in the court of appeal?

A

o In the CoA, if they decide the application cannot be determined fairly without a hearing parties they must list a hearing 14 days after the relevant direction

o If the CoA refuse permission at the hearing then this is the end of the process, there is no further right of appeal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are the time limits to apply for permission to appeal?

A
  • Application must be made within 21 days of a CC or HC decision and 28 days for a COA decision
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the test for permission?

A
  • There must be a real prospect of success (i.e. more than fanciful); or
  • There is some other compelling reason why the case should be heard (i.e. an important question or law or policy)

+ if the appeal is to the Court of Appeal or Supreme Court, the case must raise an important principle or practice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

when it is the second appeal, who grants permission?

A
  • Permission is required from the Court of Appeal who would hear the case
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how does the test for permission change on second appeal?

A
  • The same test is applied, however in relation to the ‘important point of principle’ it must be in relation to a new principle, not correcting an established principle. This is why it is quite rare.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

who will hear the appeal of a DJ in the CC?

A

CJ in the CC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

who will hear the appeal of a master/DJ in the HC?

A

HCJ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

who will hear the appeal of a CJ?

A

HCJ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

who will hear the appeal of a HCJ?

A

Court of Appeal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is a leapfrog appeal? Explain the route

A

When an appeal is heard by a higher appellate court than usual, i.e.:
* Appeal from CC/HC usually heard in the CC / HC - jump to the CoA
* Appeal from HC usually heard in CoA - jump to SC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

when will a leapfrog appeal be allowed from the CC/HC to the COA?

A

o The case must raise an important principle or practice or there is some other compelling reason for the CoA to hear it
o Permission must be given by either the CC/HC or the CoA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

when will a leapfrog appeal be allowed from the HC to the SC?

A

Exceptional and usually urgent cases only. 2 stages:
1. Trial judge grants a leapfrog certificate
2. Permission to appeal by the SC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what are the grounds of appeal?

A

The court can only grant an appeal if the decision of the lower court was:
o Wrong (i.e. law, interpretation of facts or exercise of discretion); or
o Unjust because of a serious procedural irregularity in the proceedings of the lower court

17
Q

on what basis may a decision be ‘wrong’?

A
  • Law
  • Exercise of discretion
  • Facts
18
Q

re: grounds (wrong)

explain wrong as to law

A

i.e. lower court wrong interpreted or applied statute

19
Q

re: grounds (wrong)

explain wrong as to exercise of discretion

A

the judge either erred in their approach; left out evidence; considered evidence they should not have or did not fairly balance various factors

20
Q

re: grounds (wrong)

explain wrong as to facts

A

the judge’s finding of fact was unsupported by evidence or no reasonable judge would have reached the same conclusion

21
Q

give an example was to how a decision may be unjust

A
  • More difficult to evidence. Example - judge gave inadequate reasons or did not let a party make submissions