Appealability & Review AND (Erie) Law Applied by Fed Courts Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

In what timeframe must you file a Notice of Appeal?

A

= must file Notice of Appeal WITHIN 30 Days of judgment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the grounds for appealing a judgment?

A

a Party’s grounds for appealing a judgment = the objections that Party raised at trial, AND the basis for each objection

*if Party doesn’t PRESERVE its grounds for appeal by raising his objections at Trial → then Party has WAIVED those potential grounds for appeal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When may a Party appeal an alleged error by the Trial Court?

A

a Party MAY appeal an alleged error by the Trial Court if…

= IF, but for the error, the outcome of the Case would have been different

*so, CANNOT appeal if error was “harmless”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

To appeal a case, what must its disposition be by the Trial Court?

A

To appeal a case, generally, the Trial Court must have issued the FINAL JUDGMENT

*but there are some EXCEPTIONS:

  1. Collateral Appeal Exception
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What’s an Interlocutory Order? Examples?

Can it be appealed?

A

Interlocutory Order = an order issued by the Judge BEFORE his Final Judgment

*generally, an Interlocutory Order CANNOT be appealed

E.g., these are Interlocutory Orders which CANNOT be appealed b/c they’re not considered ‘final judgments’:

  1. Lack of Jurisdiction
  2. Improper Venue
  3. Failure to Join an Indispensable Party

**BUT there’s the Collateral Order Exception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Collateral Order

A

Collateral Order Exception: a District Court’s Collateral Order (one that’s issued before Final Judgment) CAN be appealed IF…

1) the Order conclusively determines the disputed question,
2) the Order resolves an important issue that’s completely SEPARATE from the merits of the action, AND
3) waiting until Final Judgment is issued would make the Order effectively unappealable (delay would cause irreparable damage)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

If there’s a suit with multiple claims, and the Judge issues an order on only one of the Claims, is that one order appealable?

A

If there’s a suit with multiple claims, and the Judge issues an order on only one of the Claims → that is NOT appealable b/c resolving ONLY one of multiple claims in a suit is NOT a Final Judgment

*UNLESS the Judge finds “no reason to delay” and issues a Final Judgment on that

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When is a Judge’s denial of a Motion for Summary Judgment appealable?

A

= not appealable until AFTER the Trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When is a Judge’s Order for a New Trial appealable?

A

= order for a New Trial is NOT appealable - b/c it’s not a Final Judgment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Partial Final Judgment

A

= courts AVOID issuing Partial Final Judgments b/c they create problems for the appeals process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Is a grant / denial of an Injunction appealable?

A

= a grant / denial of an Injunction IS appealable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Is the certification / denial of a Class Action appealable?

A

= a certification / denial of a Class Action IS appealable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What’s the Standard of Review for issues of law?

A

the Standard of Review for issues of LAW = “De Novo” review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What’s the Standard of Review when a court has erred (e.g., relevancy, prejudice, admissibility, other legal errors)?

A

when a court has erred, the Standard of Review is → whether that error was an “Abuse of Discretion” by the court

e.g., relevancy, prejudice, admissibility, other legal errors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What’s the Standard of Review for issues of fact?

A

the Standard of Review for issues of FACT = whether the court’s determination of the facts was “Clearly Erroneous”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Erie Doctrine

What do you look for? Explain the scenarios where it applies.

A

Erie Doctrine

  • TIP: look for Facts where it’s a DIVERSITY Case AND it asks you to choose which of TWO jurisdictions’ law applies…
  • TWO Hypos for Erie:
    • *Erie applies to _DIVERSITY_ SMJ Cases
    • #1) Q requires choosing b/t FEDERAL Law vs. STATE Law (e.g., Statute of Limitations)
      • → apply State Substantive Law
        • *EXCEPT, if the issue is a Federal PROCEDURAL issue (e.g., Venue) → apply Federal Procedural Law (i.e., the FRCP)
    • #2) Q requires choosing b/t STATE 1’s Law vs. STATE 2’s Law
      • → apply law of the State where the Federal Court sits that’s hearing the case
17
Q

For Erie purposes, a statute of limitations is what type of issue? And what will govern it?

A

For Erie purposes, a statute of limitations is a…

SUBSTANTIVE issue

– governed by State SUBSTANTIVE Law

18
Q

For Erie purposes, venue is what type of issue? And what will govern it?

A

For Erie purposes, venue is a…

PROCEDURAL issue

– governed by Federal PROCEDURAL Law

19
Q

Temporary Restraining Order

A

a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) is granted → to prevent IMMEDIATE irreparable harm

*do NOT have to give prior Notice to the Restrained Party

*lasts for MAXIMUM of 14 Days (…if you want more than 14 days, must seek a Preliminary Injunction)

20
Q

Preliminary Injunction

A

a Preliminary Injunction is granted to a Moving Party (“MP”) IF…

AFTER providing Notice to Non-MP AND holding a Hearing on the matter, the MP…

(1) would suffer irreparable harm w/o the injunction,
(2) is likely to succeed on the merits,
(3) harm from not granting injunction OUTWEIGHS harm to the Non-MP, AND
(4) would be in public’s best interest