Appeal Rule 40 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Rule 40 Section 1

A

An appeal from a judgment or final order of a Municipal court may be taken to the Regional Trial Court exercising jurisdiction over the area to which the former pertains. The title of this case shall remain as it was in the court of origin, but the party appealing the case shall further be referred to as the appellant and the adverse party as the appellee.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is an Appeal?

A

It is remedy pursuant to which a decision of the lower court may be reviewed by the appropriate higher court on grounds of perceived errors in the findings and/or conclusion of law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Is an appeal a constitutional right?

A

No, it is merely a statutory privilege, and may be exercised only in the manner and in accordance with the provisions of law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In general, what is required to elevate the case on appeal?

A

Only judgments or final orders of the court that completely dispose of the case, or of a particular matter therein, may be elevated on appeal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is meant by final judgment, or order or decree ?

A

It is the one that finally disposes of, adjudicates or determine the rights, or some rights of the parties, either on the entire controversy or some definite and separate branch thereof, and which concludes them until it is reversed or set aside.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the orders or judgment where an appeal is not available as a remedy?

A

1) an order denying a petition for relief or any similar motion seeking relief from judgment;

2) interlocutory order;

3) an order disallowing or dismissing an appeal;

4) an order denying a motion to set aside a judgment by consent, confession or compromise on the ground of fraud, mistake or duress, or any other vitiating consent;
5) and order of execution

6) a judgment or final order for or against one or more of several parties or in separate claims, counterclaims, cross-claims and third-party complaints, while the main case is pending, unless the court allows on appeal therefrom;

7) an order dismissing the action without prejudice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

If a judgment or final order is not appealable, what can the aggrieved party do?

A

file an appropriate special civil action under Rule 65 (in relation with the last paragraph of rule 41 section 1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the remedy against an order denying a petition for relief or any similar motions seeking relief from judgment?

A

Appeal is prohibited, but certiorari may be availed of pursuant to the last paragraph of Section 1, Rule 41.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is an interlocutory order?

A

An interlocutory order refers to something between the commencement and the end of the suit which decides some point or matter, but it is not a final decision of the whole controversy?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Can mandamus be availed of in cases, where there was a denial of a motion for intervention?

A

Yes, only in exceptional cases where appeal would not be an adequate and speedy remedy and there is a grave abuse of discretion, manifest injustice or palpable excess of authority equivalent to denial of a settled right to which petitioner is entitled.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the examples of an interlocutory order?

A

1) an order denying/granting a motion for extension of time to file answer

2) an order denying/granting a motion to amend pleading;

3) an order denying/granting a motion for resetting of trial

4) an order on the admissibility of evidence

5) an order setting aside the order of default and the judgment by default

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Can an order denying a motion for intervention be a subject of appeal?

A

Yes, because the order denying such motion for intervention is “final” insofar as the movant or would-be intervenor is concerned, there being nothing left to be done as to him.

(Note: the appeal should be from the order denying the intervention, as he cannot appeal from the decision, not being made a party to the case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

On what instances where certiorari under rule 65 is unavailing as a remedy for denied interlocutory orders?

A

1) an order denying the affirmative defense

2) an order of the court submitting the case for judgment on the pleadings or summary judgment

3) an order denying the demurrer to evidence

4) an order of the court approving or denying a motion for judgment on the pleadings.

5) an order of the court approving or denying a motion for summary judgment

6) interlocutory orders in cases falling under the revised rules on summary procedure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the remedy against an order disallowing or dismissing an appeal?

A

1) certiorari (last paragraph of section 1, rule 41)

2) mandamus (section 3, rule 65)

3) petition for relief from the denial of appeal (section 2 rule, 38)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the remedy against an order denying a motion to set aside a judgment by consent, confession or compromise on the ground of fraud, mistake or duress, or any other ground vitiating consent?

A

1) certiorari (last paragraph section 1,rule41)

2) prohibition or mandamus (jurisprudence, in relation to an order of execution)

3) where a party alleges mistake, fraud, violence, intimidation, undue influence, or falsity in the execution of the compromise embodied in a judgment, an action to annul could be brought before the CA (section 9 (2) of BP 129, which gives the court exclusive original jurisdiction over actions for annulment of judgments of RTC)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the remedy against an order of execution?

A

1) certiorari

2) filing a motion with the court which issued the writ of execution questioning the validity of such writ or the implementation thereof

3) filing a third party complaint

4) filing of “appropriate separate action”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the remedy against a judgment or final order for or against one or more of several parties or in separate claims, counterclaims, cross-claims and third-party complaints, while the main case is pending?

A

1) certiorari

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

On what instances, is a case dismissed without prejudice?

A

1) first dismissal of the complaint at the instance of the plaintiff, unless the court directs otherwise

2) dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute, or failure to appear at trial, or to comply with the rules or order of the court under Section 3, rule 17 of the amended rules, where the order of dismissal expressly states that the dismissal does not operate as an adjudication on the merits.

3) non-compliance with the requirement anent certification against forum shopping, unless the order of dismissal states that such dismissal is with prejudice

4) dismissal of the case based on affirmative defense that the venue is improperly laid

5) dismissal of the case on the affirmative defense that the plaintiff has no legal capacity to sue

6) dismissal of the case on the affirmative defense that the complaints state no cause of action

7) dismissal of the case based on the affirmative defense that a condition precedent for filing a claim has not been complied with

8) dismissal of the case for non-payment of the correct docket fees

9) dismissal of the case because the complaint is pro forma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the remedy for cases that was dismissed without prejudice?

A

1) refile the case

2) certiorari, granted that there should be grave abuse of discretion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is the remedy of cases that were dismissed with prejudice?

A

Appeal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

On what instances can a case be dismissed with prejudice, even without a trial?

A

1) dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute, or failure to appear at trial, or comply with the rules or order of the court under Section 3, Rule 17 Amendment rules, where the order of dismissal does not state that the dismissal does not operate as an adjudication on the merits.

2) dismissal of the case for the repeated failure of the plaintiff to appear in pre-trial

3) dismissal of the case pursuant to the ground of res judicata or prior judgment

4) dismissal of the case pursuant to the ground that the action is barred by statute of limitation

5) dismissal of the case pursuant to the affirmative defenses that the claim or demand set forth in the plaintiff’s pleading has been paid, waived, abandoned, or otherwise extinguished

6) dismissal of the case on the ground that the claim on which the action is founded is unenforceable under the provisions of the statutes of fraud.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

When to appeal?

A

An appeal may be taken within 15 days after the notice to the appellant of the judgment or final order appealed from. Where a record on appeal is required, the appellant shall file a notice of appeal and record on appeal within 30 days after notice of the judgment or final order

The period of appeal shall be interrupted by a timely motion for new trial or reconsideration. No motion for extension of time to file a motion for new trial or reconsideration shall be allowed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

When can multiple appeals be allowed?

A

1) special proceedings

2) where the court renders “several” or “separate” judgments under section 4 or 5, rule 36 of the rules of court, if the trial court allows the filing of multiple appeals.

3) in action for recovery of property

4) in actions for partition of property with accounting

5) in special civil action for eminent domain

6)foreclosure of mortgage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is the reckoning point or when shall the 15 days, 30 days, 48 hours period starts to count?

A

It shall be reckoned with from receipt of notice of decision or final by the party-litigants counsel of records, which is considered notice to the parties. Service of judgment or final order on the party represented by counsel is not considered the official notice and receipt of judgment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

How to appeal?

A

The appeal is taken by filing a notice of appeal with the court that rendered the judgment or final order appealed from. The notice of appeal shall indicate the parties to the appeal, the judgment or final order or part thereof appeal from, and state the material dates showing the timeliness of the appeal.

A record on appeal shall be required only in special proceedings and in other cases of multiple or separate appeals.

Copies of the notice of appeal, and the record on appeal where required, shall be served on the adverse party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What is rule 40 about?

A

Rule 40 is an appeal from the MTC. Appeal is only allowed in cases where the case is already disposed or adjudicated, but did not attain finality yet.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Does the CA need a trial in their proceedings regarding appeal?

A

No, they will decide based on the records. (BP129 Section 22)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What is required in order for an appeal may be had in the rtc ?

A

error fact or error of law that will warrant reversel or modification

28
Q

In instances where an issue was already disposed, however there is still an issue that is still pending. Can it be executed or appealed?

A

Yes, as long those decisions separable or can be made distinct from the other.

29
Q

What are the actions that are not appealable?

A

Rule 41 Section 1

a) an order denying a petition for relief from judgment or any other similar motions seeking relief

b) an interlocutory order

c) an order dismissing or disallowing an appeal

d) an order denying a motion to set aside judgment by confession, compromise, consent on the ground of fraud, mistake or duress, or any other vitiating consent.

e) an order of execution

f) an order against one or more several judgments or separate claims, cross claims, counter claims, and third party claims, while the main case is pending

g) an order dismissing a case without prejudice

30
Q

Is a motion granting or denying an MR or MNT subject to certiorari?

A

under 07-7-12 MR and MNT cannot be remedied by certiorari

31
Q

Provided that you filed a petition for relief from judgment, but it was denied. What will be your remedy?

A

Petition for certiorari under rule 65

32
Q

What is an interlocutory order?

A

These are orders that does not dispose of the case, or it does not adjudicate a case.

33
Q

Examples of an interlocutory order

A

a) an order denying or granting a motion for extension to file an answer

b) an order denying or grantin a motion to amend the pleading

c) admissibility of evidence

d) an order denying/ granting resetting of trial

e) an order setting aside a judgment by default or order of default

34
Q

Provided that you are an aggrieved party, and you decided to file a motion-for-intervention, because your properties were impleaded even if you are not a party to the case. The motion was denied, can you appeal such order of the court?

A

Yes, the movant of the motion-for-intervention may appeal the denial of the motion for intervention. As could be seen from the case the denial of such motion is already a final adjudication with respect to his case.

Mandamus could also be had, if it is manifest that the right the movant was denied. Provided that there was no more speedy or adequate remedy to resolve the situation.

35
Q

What is the remedy in case of denial of an interlocutory order?

A

65

36
Q

What are the interlocutory orders that rule 65 is unavailing?

A

a) an order denying an affirmative defense (rule 8 section 12 (e)), the remedy being to proceed with trial and then appeal from the jusdment in the case, and assign, as one of the errors on appeal, the denial of an affirmative defense.

b) an order of the court submitting the case for summary judgment or judgment on the pleadings, the remedy being to proceed with the trial and appeal the judgment in the case, and assign it as one of the errors on appeal, such order submitting the case for summary judgment or judgment on the pleadings. (Section 10 rule 18)

c) an order denying a demurrer to evidence, the remedy being to proceed with the trial and assign and appeal from the judgment therefrom, and assign it as one of the errors on appeal, the order denying a demurrer to evidence (Section 2 rule 33)

d) an order denying or approving a motion for summary judgment, the remedy being an appeal from the judgment in the case, and assign it as one of the errors on appeal, the approval and denial of a motion for summary judgment. (Rule 35 Section 3)

e) an order approving or denying a motion for judgment on the pleadings, the remedy being an appeal from the judgment of the case and assign it as one of the errors, the order denying or approving judgment on the pleadings (Section 2 rule 34)

f) interlocutory orders in cases falling under the revised rules on summary procedure, the remedy being an appeal from the judgment in the case and assign, as one of the errors on appeals, the validity of an interlocutory order

37
Q

What is the remedy if your appeal was denied or dismissed?

A

a) certiorari
b)petition for relief from judgment
c) mandamus

38
Q

What is the remedy of Section 1 (d) rule 41?

A

a) certiorari
b)annulment of judgment in the ca, aggrieved party alleges mistake, fraud, violence, intimidation, undue influence, or falsity in the execution of the compromise embodied in the judgment
c) petition for relief in cases of compromise

39
Q

What are the remedies against order of execution?

A

a) cpm
b) a motion to question the validity of the writ of execution
c) third-party claim
d) separate claim

40
Q

What is the difference between rule 36 section 4 and rule 36 section 5?

A

Rule 36 section 4 pertains to several judgments, wherein many defendants can be impleaded. A judgment against one may or may not be a judgment against all.

Rule 36 section 5 on the other hand pertains to separate judgments, wherein there are many reliefs sought

41
Q

What is the remedy of RUle 41 Section 1 (f)?

A

a) appeal, but it depends upon the sound discretion of the court, if the main case is still pending.

b) consolidated appeal from the ultimate and several judgments

c) certiorari

42
Q

What are the orders dismissing an action without prejudice?

A

1) dismissal of the case at the instance of the plaintiff

2) dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, failure to appear at a trial, or to comply with the rules or orders of the court under section 3 rule 17 of the amended rules, where the order of dismissal expressly states that the disposal of the case is does not operate as an adjudication of the merits.

3) non-compliance of the requirement anent certification of forum shopping, unless the order of dismissal states that such dismissal is without prejudice

4) dismissal of the case based on affirmative defense that venue is improperly laid

5) dismissal of the case based on affirmative defense that there is no legal capacity to sue

6) dismissal of the case based on the affirmative defense that the complaint states no cause of action

7) dismissal of the case for noncompliance of a condition precedent for filing a claim

8) dismissal of the case for non-payment of docket fees

9) dismissal of the case because the pleading is pro forma (unsigned)

43
Q

What is the remedy in such cases where the case is dismissed without prejudice?

A

a) 65
b) refiling of the case either to the same court or to the proper court

44
Q

on What instance is the dismissal with prejudice?

A

1) dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute, failure to appear at a trial, failure to comply with the orders of the court or the rules under rule 3 section 17 of the amended rules, where the court does not expressly state that the dismissal does not operate as an adjudication on the merits

2) Dismissal of the case for failure of plaintiff to appear in the pre-trial. The dismissal here is deemed is deemed to be with prejudice, unless the court directs otherwise.

3) Dismissal of the ca by reason of res judicata or bar by prior judgment

4) dismissal of the case on the ground that the action is barred by statute of limitations

5) dismissal of the case pursuant to the affirmative defenses that the claim or demand set forth in the plaintiff’s pleading has been paid, waived, abandoned, or otherwise extinguished.

6) dismissal of the case on the ground that the claim on which the action is unenforceable under the provisions of statute of frauds

45
Q

exception to the cases dismissed without prejudice

A

Although dismissal on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter is a dismissal without prejudice, in relation to section 41, such dismissal is not appealable. However, by way of exception it may be appealed to the rtc pursuant to rule 40 section 8.

46
Q

Provided that you filed a case in the MTC, but it was dismissed on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter. What will be your remedy?

A

Rule 40 section 8 states that such dismissal can be appealed to the RTC, by way of exception.

47
Q

If the MTC dismissed a case on the ground of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, and when appealed to the RTC pursuant to section 8 rule 40, the RTC found that MTC has jurisdiction. What will be the recourse of the RTC?

A

The RTC should remand the case for further proceedings.

48
Q

If the MTC decided a case even without jurisdiction, and it was appealed to the RTC and it was found that MTC does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter, what will be the recourse of the RTC?

A

The RTC will not dismiss the case if it has original jurisdiction over the subject matter, that shall decide the case in accordance with the preceding section, without prejudice to the admission of amended pleadings and additional evidence in the interest of justice.

49
Q

What will happen to the action that is dismissed by the MTC on the ground of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter?

A

it will be considered as an original action by the RTC if he finds that he has jurisdiction over the subject matter. Its decision will be appealable in the ca not by way petition for review, but by way of ordinary appeal under rule 41.

50
Q

If a plaintiff already filed a motion for partial execution of the judgment , can he still file an appeal?

A

As a general rule, the plaintiff cannot anymore appeal from the decision if he already filed for an execution of the judgment or decision. However, by way of exception he can still file an appeal, if the execution is based on the discretion of the court under section 2 rule 39, or it is based on the actions for injunction, receivership, accounting , and support

50
Q

If the notice on appeal was already filed, where can the plaintiff file a motion for execution of jugment pending appeal?

A

In the appellate court, provided that it will only be allowed if there was good reasons and after due hearing.

51
Q

What is the neypes rule?

A

Neypes rule provides a fresh period for appellants to file an appeal after a denial of a motion for reconsideration or a denial of a motion for new trial. The appellant may appeal from the judgment or the decision, and not to the denial of the motion for recon or for the motion for new trial.

51
Q

What are the cases subject for multiple appeals?

A

1) recovery of property with accouting

2) partition with accounting

3) special civil action of eminent domain

4) several judgments or separate claims

5) special proceedings

6) foreclosure of mortgage

52
Q

When shall the appeal be reckoned?

A

From the receipt of the notice of decision or final order by the party-litigants counsel fo records

53
Q

What are the contents of the notice of appeal?

A

1) material dates
2) parties of the appeal
3)judgment or final order
4) served on the adverse party

54
Q

Where does a notice of appeal be filed?

A

in the court which rendered the judgment, same with record on appeal. However, different story for appeals to the SC and CA.

55
Q

Can the filing of the record on appeal be extended?

A

yes, it must be filed within the 30 day reglementary period.

56
Q

Do you still need to file a notice on appeal when filing a record on appeal?

A

yes

57
Q

What is the effect of the perfection of appeal?

A

A party’s appeal by notice of appeal is deemed perfected as to him upon filing of the notice of appeal in due time. The court loses jurisdiction over the case upon the perfection of the appeals filed in due time and the expiraiton of the time to appeal of the other parties.

A party’s appeal by record on appeal is deemed perfected as to him with respect to the subejct matter therof upon the approval of therecord on appeal filed in due time. The court loses jurisdiciton only over the subject matter thereof upon the approval of the records on appeal field in due time and the expiration of the appeal of the other parties

58
Q

What is the rule regarding reglementary periods with respect to its availability on the both parties?

A

The parties reglementary period is to each of his own.

1) if one party filed an appeal within the reglementary period, the court already lost jurisdiction of the case as to him only. Insofar as the other party is concerned the court may still act over the MR, MNT or appeals that will be filed by him.

2) the reglementary period is to each of his own, the court fully loses jurisdiction if both periods expires.

59
Q

on record on appeal, how is it perfected?

A

upon the approval of the record on appeal

60
Q

Residual jurisdiction

A

1) to issue the protection and preservation of the rights of the parties which do not involve any matter litigated by the appeal

2) to approve compromises

3) permit appeals of indigent litigants

4) to order execution pending appeal in accordance with section2 rule 39

5) to allow withdrawal of the appeal

6) dismiss the appeal pursuant ot section 13, rule 41, for being filed out time or for non-payment docket fees

61
Q

What is required for the court to exercise residual jurisdiction?

A

it needs to be that the original record and the record on appeal is still in the trial court, it must not have been submitted or transmitted to the appellate court

62
Q

Where and when to pay the docket and other lawful fees?

A

within the reglementary period, and to the court which rendered the judgment or final order. record on appeal, original record, or proof of payment shall be transmitted to the appellate court.

63
Q

Perfection of the appeal is attained after a notice of appeal was filed, what about the docket fees is it required to be paid before the appeal is actually perfected?

A

In relation section 9 rule 40, rule 41 provisions can be applicable to the rule 40 provisions. It was stated there that nonpayment of docket fees may be used as a ground for dismissal. In addition, jurisprudence also dictates dismissal of appeals by reason of non-payment of docket fees within reglementary period. Thus, it is safe to assume that perfection of the appeal is also dependent upon the payment of docket or other lawful fees, which means that payment is somehow mandatory in order for an appeal to be perfected.

64
Q

What are the duties of the clerk of court?

A

His/her duty is to transmit the original records, and record on appeal within 15 days to the appellate court. Clerk is also oblgied to certify that all documents are complete, and also obliged to transmit the exhibits and transcripts. A copy of the transmittal letter shall be furnished to parties (section 6 rule 40)

65
Q

What is the duty of the appellant?

A

within 15 days after notice from the rtc, it shall be the duty of the appellant to submit a memorandum which briefly discuss the

  • errors imputed to the lower court
    -a copy which shall be furnished by him to the adverse party

appellee will also be required to file memorandum (not a motion to dismiss)
- not mandatory, if there is no memorandum filed in the court, they will decide on the merits of the records of the proceedings and from the memoranda

66
Q

Consequence of non-filing of memorandum?

A

dismissal