Apologetics Test 5 Flashcards

1
Q

A false representation of a man

A

Strawman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

This fallacy occurs when one who is speaking states a claim that would make anything else his opponent says sound utterly foolish

A

Poisoning the well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

This fallacy occurs when the argument contains the conclusion within the premises of the argument

A

Begging the Question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When hunters would train their dogs to find prey

A

Red herring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Argument arises when one argues that just due to fact that a thing appeals before a given event, that this thing caused this event to happen

A

Post hoc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When one person offers his opponent a question and gives only a couple possible answers when there is actually a third option that is not mentioned

A

False Dilema

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When one a person makes a conclusion based on too small a sampling of a group

A

Hasty Generalization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Literally means an argument “against the man”

A

Ad hominem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When it is claimed, “if you do this, then you will soon slip into that.” Occurs when an if/then statement is not casually related

A

Slippery slope

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

As the name denotes, this fallacy transpires when one makes an anology that just does not unite the two things being compared

A

Faulty Analogy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The study of right reason or valid inferences and the attending fallacies; formal and informal

A

Logic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Simply the use of reason as a tool to help create a good argument or to distinguish a good argument from a bad one

A

Simpler definition of logic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Only supports, but does not prove the conclusion, argues specific to general

A

Inductive Logic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Results in a conclusive result, argues general to specific

A

Deductive logic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Deals with whether premises correspond to reality

A

Truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Considers whether or not the logic involved in the argument is correct

17
Q

Can a bad argument be logically valid yet be untrue?

True or false

18
Q

What are the five segments of this chapter?

A
  • what is logic?
  • the two branches of logic
  • truth and validity
  • the anatomy of an argument
  • and other logical fallacies
19
Q

What are the two ways of proving a hypothetical argument is valid?

A

Affirming the antecedent or denying the consequent

20
Q

Example of the question?

A

“If there are absolute moral laws(Antecedent) then there must be a moral law giver(consequent)

21
Q

What are disjunctive syllogisms?

A

Are simply “Either/or” statements

22
Q

Example of the syllogisms question?

A

“Either I am going to eat eggs or I am going to eat pancakes.”

23
Q

Is simply a series of interconnected sentences that result in giving evidence for a conclusion

24
Q

The structure of an argument

25
A statement or assertion that expresses a judgement or opinion
Proposition
26
A previous statement or proposition from which another is inferred or follows a conclusion
Premise
27
The end or finish of an event or process
Conclusion
28
“This is that” of “This is not that”
Categorical Syllogism
29
Are some of the most used arguments in everyday life
Hypothetical argument
30
Having a sound in basis in logic or fact; reasonable or cogent
Valid
31
Remove or wrong
Invalid
32
Occurs when the contents of an arguments states premises fail to adequately support its proposed conclusion
Informal Fallacy
33
Following someone’s logic all the way to the end in order to see the absurdity of the conclusion of their argument
Reduction ad absurden
34
What must happen in order for this fallacy to start?
Something must be wrong with where they start
35
What is the first premise?
Every consequent requires an adequate antecedent and nothing can cause itself