Apes Flashcards
Whole object constraint
new words are names for whole objects, not parts or properties
Taxonomic constraint
new words extend to members of the same kind, same kind of thing but not thematically similar
eg. cheese –> hot dog (food)
but not cheese –> rat
word learning biases
whole object constraint
taxonomic constraint
shape bias
basic level bias
mutual exclusivity
principle of contrast
shape bias
names extend to similar shaped objects
eg. cheese –> moon
mutual exclusivity
new name for new object, cannot assign more than one name to one object
principle of contrast
new name for part or property
overextension
children tend to over-generalise words to other similar things
- could be because they really think they are the same because they look similar
- or they do not know what that object is so they might as well use a word that they know so they can get their message across
underextension
child uses the word only for that particular specific instance and does not generalise it properly to other same objects
prototype
some category members are
- thought of by more people
- thought faster
- verified as a member faster
- rated as ‘better’ members
they are the most typical member
children develop meaning in the ______ year
2nd
graded category structure
typical members are easier to acquire than atypical ones, learn more typical members of a category first
that’s why when you show a typical and atypical exemplar, babies know the typical one, if you show 2 atypical exemplars from diff categories, they would not know what both are
similarity between vervet monkey and human infants in language acquisition
learn prototypical exemplars then expand the range and refine their learning
- early over-extension – think 2 birds are the same
- gradual refinement – think same-sized birds are the same
- adult category alignment – can properly identify
Word frequency effect
accessing more frequent words is more efficient
Have < pave (RT)
Age-of-acquisition
early acquired words accessed more efficiently
Egg < ego (RT)
Orthographic neighbourhood effect
words which have a lot of similar neighbours are quicker to access
Trip < move (RT)
(chip, drip, clip, tip, dip …) vs (groove, mauve … )
On-line cohort effects
words with a large onset cohort are slower to access, words with high frequency onset cohort are slower to process
Crime > stats
/kra/: 49 words, /krai/: 1 vs /sta/: 151, /stat/: 29 (still not sure if it’s the word, need to continue listening)
Lexical status effect
evidence that lexical access is a time consuming process
pmde < king (RT)
Legal non word rejection
takes longer to eliminate a possible word than to accept a real one
King < cring (RT)
repetition prime
Target faster if repeated
xkcd – – blob – – nurse – – nurse
semantic prime
Target faster if the meanings are similar/related
blob – – xkcd – – doctor – – nurse
associative prime
dog – – bone
taxonomic prime
dog – – giraffe
Prototype effect implications – graded category structure in lexical decision task
bird – – owl – – owl (slower)
bird – – robin – – robin (faster)
Fourier Theory
sound = source + filter
We produce a vibration at the vocal folds
Then we change the shape of the echo chamber (oral/nasal cavity)
Vowel Triangle
/i/: high and front tongue placement
/a/: low and front tongue placement
/o/: high and back tongue placement