AOS 1 - UNIT 4 Flashcards
The roles of the Crown in law-making - MRI
- Making and approving delegated legislation
- Royal assent
- Issuing royal commissions of inquiry
the roles of crown-examples of these roles
- Approve legal rules and regulations
- Signing a bill to become a practiced law
- investigations into matters of public importance e.g. child sex abuse
The roles of the House of Parliament in law-making - RID
- Represent the people
- Initiate, debate, and vote upon proposed laws
- Determine the government
The roles of the Senate in law-making - AIR
- Act as a house of review
- Initiate proposed laws (cannot initiate or amend money bills)
- Represent the states
The roles of the Legislative Assembly - RID
- Represent the people
- Initiate proposed laws
- Determine the government
The roles of the Legislative Council - AI
- Act as a house of review
- Initiate proposed laws (cannot initiate or amend money bills)
List the law-making powers of parliament - x3
- Exclusive powers
- Concurrent powers
- Residual powers
Define exclusive powers
exclusive powers are law-making powers given to the Commonwealth outlined in the constitution
Define concurrent powers
concurrent powers are law-making powers shared between the Commonwealth and states outlined in the constitution
Define residual powers
residual powers are law-making powers not outlined in the constitution which are held by the state
Examples of each division of power
Exclusive powers: defense, immigration, and customs
Concurrent powers: marriage, trade, taxation, and commerce
Residual powers: criminal law, education, and road rules
The significance of Section 109
Section 109 of the constitution is important in the legal system as it provides a way of resolving inconsistencies between state and commonwealth laws which can arise in areas of law-making that are concurrent
Definition of Section 109
Section 109 states that “when a law is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid”
What happens if there is an inconsistency in concurrent laws
- must be challenged in the High Court (give example R v Brislan)
- only the invalid section is removed
What was the accused charge for in the R v Brislan case
The accused was charged under the Wireless Telegraphy Act 1905 (Cth) for having a wireless set without holding a license for it