Anticoag for VTE Part 2 Flashcards
4 DOACs
Dabigatran
Rivaroxaban
Apixaban
Edoxaban
Unfractionated heparin
Indirect thrombin inhibitor (uses antithrombin) IV admin Less favorable pharmacokinetics Lots of monitoring Increased risk of HIT Less effective maybe But does not depend on renal excretion More readily reversible
Why can you not use warfarin alone for acute VTE?
It leads to transient hypercoagulability (protein C gets depleted quickly)
Warfarin must be overlapped with LMWH
What is the minimum LMWH time? And when can you stop it?
Minimum 5 days
Do not stop until INR is therapeutic
Why is it ok to use a DOAC alone for acute VTE?
DOACs have a prompt onset of action
Dabigatran and edoxaban were not studied as monotherapies
Rivaroxaban and apixaban have more intense dosing for acute phase
2 mechanisms of drug interactions with DOACs
Transport by P-glycoprotein
Metabolism by CYP450
Pros and cons of warfarin
Pros: long clinical experience, easily available lab monitoring, effective/cheap/familiar antidote, no renal excretion, cheap
Cons: delayed on and offset of action, requires frequent monitoring, lots of drug and diet interactions
Pros and cons of DOACs
Pros: quick on and offset, no monitoring required, few drug interactions, no dietary interactions
Cons: short clinical experience, no readily available lab monitoring, now/new antidotes, renal excretion, expensive
What about anticoags in pregnant patients?
Warfarin is teratogenic
DOACs may be teratogenic
LMWH is the only safe option
2 reasons to consider thrombolysis
Alleviate acute symptoms of DVT
Prevent post thrombotic syndrome (not actually effective)
Post thrombotic syndrome
Chronic swelling, pain, and skin changes after a DVT
Can be a very big problem
Phlegmasia cerulea dolens
Venous limb gangrene due to huge DVT
Veins in the leg are entirely occluded by clot
Pressure increases so much that the arterial blood flow becomes compromised
Would do thrombolysis here
3 treatment options for patients with active cancer
LMWH with bridging to warfarin (rarely)
DOAC
Long term LMWH alone
Pros and cons to LMWH in cancer patients
Pros: little to no extra blood tests, easy to use with procedures, easy to alter dose if low plts, does not require oral route, no chemo interactions, no dietary interactions
Cons: subcutaneous injection, expensive