Animal learning- Faye Flashcards
1- research that looks at the potential evolution of associative learning
Ginsburg & Jablonka ( 2010):
Associative learning appears to have evolved 520-540 million years ago during the cambrian explosion
1- research that studies embyro behaviour in a bird species
Kleindorfer & Robertson, 2013: superb fairy wren learn a unique note passcode they use to identify their young and not the sus imposter
1- research that investigates the effects of metamorphosis on catapillars learning
Blackiston et al ( 2008) found that butterflies remember what they learnt as catapillars not because the catapillar leaves a scent message in the pupae but becuase it remains stored in the brain
1- studies investigating the effects of imprinting in geese and ducks
all about lorenz he loved himself some geese and to be mummy. this is known an fillial imprinting and it occurs in many species
1- research investigating why humans are more risk aware in adolescence
patwell et al., 2012 found that its because we become independent and start navigating the world for the first proper time.
2) beef with pavlovian conditioning
rescolar ( 1988)
FOUND:
its not as simple as CS -> CR, animals are capable of learning more contextual complex relationships and have a more nuanced understanding than we believe
2) sucking off associative learning
Heyes 2012-
defends associative learning as a powerful, widespread mechanism, found across taxa including humans, and capable of supporting not only basic behaviour but complex cognition (e.g. imitation, sense of agency, decision-making)
3) review addressing the validity of reversal learning
Izquierdo et al ( 2017)
Reversal learning is a widely used test of cognitive flexibility across species.
The idea that this learning primarily measures response inhibition has been revised.
We describe how it is measured and present new definitions for its construct validity.
We also present an update of the brain regions and neurotransmitters that support it.
3) areas of the brain associated with pavlovian fear response in rodents and its applications to humans
Maren et al (2013)
associative learning is context dependent, research on rodents identified a neural circuit including the hippocampus, amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex is involved in the learning and memory processes that enable context-dependent behaviour. dysfunction in this circuit may explain psychopathology e.g. ptsd in humans
3) gap between methods to research human/ animal brain
Barron et al (2021)
- we study human brain on a macro level, loosly observing neural activation
- we study animal brains on a microscopic cell level, getting a lot of detail
- so to close this gap, we shouls use dofferent tools on the same species
- OR same tools on different species
3) neurogenesis baby- use it or lose it
Shors et al ( 2012)
we can create new neurons as adults that become integrated with others but if we dont engage in effortful learning to maintain those connections then they will die over time
3) the effects of aging on long term potentiation
Barnes (2003)
- the aging brain is worse at a lot of stuff this worsened learning/ memory may be due to deficiencies in synaptic plasticity including long term potentiation
4) the main guy on social learning
heyes (1994)
- definition ‘learning influenced by observing or interacting with another individual or its products’
- mechanisms
4) uh oh! what if social learning was just associative learning
lind et al ( 2019)
- used computational analysis to determine that when guided by genetic predispositions, associative processes can give rise to a wide variety of social learning phenomena, such as stimulus and local enhancement, contextual imitation and simple production imitation, observational conditioning, and social and response facilitation
- didnt use real animals tho….
4) model based social learning
Camacho- Alpizar & Guillette (2023)
- meta analysis on model based social learning studies found:
- demonstrator characteristics were the most influential e.g. status of the demonstrator
4) strategies used in social learning
laland ( 2004)
Social Learning Strategies
“When” Strategies
Copy when established behavior is unproductive
Copy when asocial learning is costly
Copy when uncertain
“Who” Strategies
Copy the majority
Copy if rare
Copy successful individuals
Copy if better
Copy if dissatisfied
Copy good social learners
Copy kin
Copy “friends”
Copy older individuals
4) does teaching even exist in animals
Caro& Hauser, 1992:
YES animals teach, often their young but it doesnt always look like our human centered definition of teaching so it goes unnoticed e.g.
4) cultural intelligence hypothesis
van schaik & burkart (2011)
- humans are goated because our social cognitive skills are goated:
- we know this because:
mean deprivation studies show monkeys raised without parental figures are shit at physical activities e.g. nest building
also enculturation studies e.g. taking in a monkey increases their comprehension skills past what is typical in the wild
4) evidence for cultural intelligence hypothesis
Herrmann et al, 2007
kids are as good at certain physical tasks as monkeys e.g. puzzles but socially e.g. understanding what a demonstrator was trying to do , toddlers were way better
3) neuronal changes as as a result of experience
Van praag et al (2000)
- rats in an enriched environment led to enhanced dendritic arborization,
neurogenesis and gliogenesis in the hippocampus, and
improved learning compared to baseline
3) hebbs law
hebb (1949) neuronal changes occuring at the synaptic level e.g. wiring together
3) evidence for LTP
Antanov et al. 2003
An NMDA receptor blocker blocks Pavlovian conditioning of the defensive gill reflex
* A calcium ion binder (‘chelator’) blocks Pavlovian conditioning of the defensive gill reflex
-synaptic plasticity matters for associative learning
2) evidence for the importance of continuity in classical conditioning
Clarke& Squire (1998)
found…
amnesiac patients with damage to hippocampal lesions were unable to do trace conditioning ( gap between ucs and cs being presented) due to impaired memory
2) criticism of rescorla-wagner model
Miller et al 1995
1) what about spontaneous recovery without training?
but it does inform many other models
not the best predictive strength but helpful in the field