Animal Cruelty and the Law: Prohibited/Permitted Conduct Flashcards

1
Q

Negligence

A

Failure to exercise the standard of care that a reasonably prudent person would have exercised in a similar situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Knowingly

A

The person knows/is aware that their actions will have a certain result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Intentional

A

Intends the action to have a certain result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Wilful

A

Voluntary act; purposeful but not malicious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Malice

A

Intent without justification or excuse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Cruelly

A

Malicious and malicious, confined to human or animal physical abuse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Can we use a generic approach to animal cruelty cases?

A

No! Types of animal cruelty crimes are diverse and very different
-You can have a set of guidelines put in place, but it will not be fit for every case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In terms of the Federal Animal Welfare Act, what does the AWA PROTECT?

A

Any live/dead dog, monkey, guinea pig, hamster, rabbit, or warm blooded animal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In terms of the Federal Animal Welfare Act, what does the AWA EXCLUDE?

A

Birds, rats & mice used in research, horses NOT used in research, animals used for food, and cold-blooded animals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are Ag-Gag laws? “anti-whistle blower laws”

A

Prohibit the making of unauthorized videos/sound recordings, or the taking of unauthorized photos by journalists, activities, and employees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the purpose of the Endangered Species Act? (ESA)

A

To prevent extinction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

ON MIDTERM

Ringling Bros Case Study

A

-PETA representatives claimed the circus mistreated the animals featured in its shows and that baby elephants were forcibly removed from mothers and that elephants would be tied down and beaten
-Paid a former circus employee to falsely testify that elephants had been abused
-The circus sued the animal rights groups for violating federal racketeering law
-Awarded $93 million, judge ruled in favor of the circus, b/c it was based on untruthful testimony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

ON MIDTERN
Definition of Legal Standing

A

A legal term used in connection with lawsuits and a requirement of Article III of the U.S. Constitution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly