Anger management Flashcards
Background
Recidivism rates:
Over a quarter of offenders reoffend within a year.
This rises to over 50% if the initial sentence was below 12 months.
Punishments such as prison may work for some, but as a way of rehabilitating offenders to become productive members of society it is failing.
Anger in prisoners
Criminals have a tendency towards irrational ways of thinking such as having a hostile attribution bias.
Key aims
The aim is to change the way a person handles anger and aggression.
The situation itself may not be changeable but a person can change the way they think about it and as a result change their behaviour.
Navarro (2011)
Identified three key aims for any anger management programme:
Cognitive restructuring.
Regulation of arousal.
Behavioural strategies.
Navarro (2011) - cognitive restructuring
Greater self-awareness and control over cognitive dimensions of anger.
Navarro (2011) - regulation of arousal
Learning to control the physiological state.
Navarro (2011) - behavioural strategies
Such as problem solving, strategic withdrawal and assertiveness.
Stress inoculation
Can be seen as a way of “vaccinating” an individual’ against anger so that when they come in contact with an anger provoking situation, they are better able to cope and will not engage in angry behaviour.
Stress inoculation - three key steps
Conceptualisation.
Skill acquisition and rehearsal.
Application and follow through.
Stress inoculation - conceptualisation
Clients learn about anger and how it can be adaptive and non-adaptive.
They analyse their own patterns of anger and identify situations which provoke anger in them.
Stress inoculation - skill acquisition and rehearsal
Clients are taught various skills to help manage their anger such as self-regulation, cognitive flexibility and relaxation.
They are also taught better communication skills so they can resolve conflicts assertively without being angry.
Stress inoculation - application and follow through
Clients apply the skills initially in controlled and non-threatening situations such as role plays of situations that previously made them angry.
They receive extensive feedback from the therapist and other group members.
Later clients can try out their skills in real-world settings.
Taylor and Novaco (2006)
Reports 75% improvement rates (based on six meta analyses).
This shows that anger management programmes are successful in reducing anger.
Landenberger and Lipsey (2005)
Analysed 58 studies using CBT with offenders.
20 of these studies looked at therapies where anger control was a key component.
Researchers found that having an anger control element was significantly related to amount of improvement.
Limitations of anger management programmes
SOme offenders don’t like to reflect on their style of thinking.
One way to cope with potential dropout is to assess “readiness to change”.
There are scales to measure this such as the anger readiness to change questionnaire.