And More Flashcards
Woolmington principal - Presumption of innocence
This principal establishes that subject to specific secretary exceptions the burden of proof lies clearly with the prosecution in relation to all elements of the offence
R V Wanhalla - beyond reasonable doubt
An honest and reasonable uncertainty left in your mind about the guilt of the defendant after you have given careful and impartial consideration to all of the evidence.
The crown must prove the accused is guilty beyond reasonable doubt
Balance of probabilities
Where the defence is required to prove a particular element, such as insanity, on the balance of probabilities of my simply show that it is more probable than not
Purpose of evidence law
The purpose of the act is to help secure the determination of a proceeding by
– providing facts to be established by application of logical rules
– providing rules of evidence that recognise importance of the Bill of Rights act
– promoting fairness to parties and witnesses
– protecting rights of confidentiality and other important public interest
– avoiding unjustifiable delay and expense
– enhancing access to law of evidence
Facts in issue
Facts which in law need to be proven to succeed with the case
Qualifications as an expert
An expert as a person who has specialised knowledge or skills based on training, study or experience.
The judge must determine whether the expert witness is properly qualified testify. Opinions given by non-expert on matters calling for expertise will be in admissible
The expert as required to demonstrate to the court that they have the requisite qualification to be deemed an expert in the field in question
The expert maybe qualified through formal study and training from experience or both. Evidence offered by an expert should be within their area of expertise
Before a summons is served the following verification must be made
1) whether they are allowed to give evidence
2) whether they are required to give evidence
3) whether they can refuse to give evidence
4) what type of witness they will be
Associated defendant
Person whom a prosecution has been initiated for
– an offence arises in relation to the same events as did the offence for which the defendant is being prosecuted
– an offence that relates to, or is connected with, the offence of for which the defendant is being prosecuted
And associated defendant is someone against Home the prosecution has been initiated for an offence arising out of the same events as the offence for which the defendant has been tried, or relates to, or is connected with, the offence which the defendant is being tried
Not compellable to give evidence
The sovereign, governor general, and sovereign or head of state of a foreign country, are not compatible to give evidence
Types of privilege
– Communication with legal advisors
– solicitors trust account
– Prepatory material for proceedings
– settlement negotiations or meditation
– communications with ministers of religion
– information obtained by medical professionals and clinical psychologists
Evidence in rebuttal
Evidence called by either party after the completion of their own case in order to tribute something arising during trial, can only be admitted with leave of the court. Such leave maybe given to the prosecution if the further evidence
– relates to a purely formal matter
– relates to a matter arising out of the conduct of the defence, the relevance of which would not reasonably have been foreseen (most common ground for leave to be granted)
– was not available or admissible before the prosecution case was closed
– is required to be admitted in the interest of justice
Warning the evidence maybe unreliable
In a criminal proceeding with a jury, the judge must consider whether to give a warning whenever the following evidence is given
– hearsay evidence
– evidence of a statement by the defendant that if evidence is the only evidence implicating the defendant
– evidence given by witness who may have a motive to give false evidence that is prejudicial to the defendant
– evidence of the statement by the defendant to another person made while both the defendant and the other person where are present, Police Station, or other place of detention
– evidence about the conduct of the defendant if that conduct is alleged to have occurred more than 10 years previously
Direction about evidence given by children
In general should be treated the same as evidence given by adults. That’s prohibited
– the judge from giving warnings about the absence of corporation we are a warning would not have been given in the case of an adult complainant
– any direction or a comment (absence expert evidence to the contrary) that there is a need to scrutinise children’s evidence with special care, that the children generally tend to invent or distort
Address the judge
Your honour, sir, ma’am
Referring to your notebook
– Ask the courts permission
– introduce the material properly (I interviewed the defendant and wrote the answers in my notebook at the time)
– defence and you are entitled to view your notes so seal off other entries
– only can refresh memory. Cannot read entire entry unless you have permission