An Interactionist Approach Flashcards
What is the interactionist approach?
The diathesis stress model
What is the diathesis-stress model?
Explains mental disorders as the result of an interaction between biological (the diathesis) and environmental (stress) influences.
What do family study’s suggest?
People have varying levels of inherited genetic vulnerability to schizophrenia, from very low to very high.
What’s the diathesis?
The genetic component in terms of vulnerability
What supports the diathesis?
Findings that the identical twin of a person with schizophrenia is at greater risk of developing schizophrenia than a sibling of fraternal twin, and that adoptive relatives do not share the increased risk of biological relatives (Tienari, 2004).
What supports the stress?
Not 100% concordance rates, so must be environmental factors as well.
What does the stress suggest?
Stressful life events can trigger schizophrenia and can take a variety of forms such as childhood trauma or the stresses associated with living in a highly urbanised environment.
What did Varese (2012) find? (Stress)
That children who experienced severe trauma before the age of 16 were 3X as likely to develop schizophrenia in later life compared to the general population.
There was a relationship between the level of trauma and the likelihood of developing schizophrenia, with those severely traumatised as children being at greater risk.
What did Vassos (2012) find? (Stress)
A meta-analysis found that the risk for schizophrenia in the most urban environments was estimated to be 2.37X higher than in the most rural environments.
How are urbanisation and schizophrenia linked?
It is not clear.
Possible that the more adverse living conditions of densely populated urban areas, but only a tiny minority of these will develop schizophrenia.
How does the diathesis-stress model play a part in schizophrenia?
Minor stressors may lead to the onset of the disorder for an individual who is highly vulnerable.
Or a major stressful event might cause a similar reaction in a person low in vulnerability.
What’s the key study?
Tienari - 2004
What was the procedure for Tienari’s study?
Hospital records were reviewed for nearly 20,000 women admitted to Finnish psychiatric hospitals between 1960 and 1979, identifying those who had been diagnosed at least once with S or paranoid psychosis.
The list was checked to find those mothers who had one or more of their offspring adopted away.
The resulting sample of 145 adopted away offspring (high-risk group) was them matched with a sample of 158 adoptees without this genetic risk (low-risk group).
Both groups were independently assessed after a median interval of 12 years, with a follow-up after 21 years.
Psychiatrists also assessed family functioning in the adoptive families using the OPAS. This scale measures families on various aspects of functioning such as parent-offspring conflict, lack of empathy and insecurity.
The interviewing psychiatrists were kept blind as to the status of the biological mothers.
What were the findings for Tienari’s study?
Of the 303 adoptees, 14 had developed S over the course of the study.
Of these 14, 11 were from the high-risk group and 3 were from the low-risk group.
However, being reared in a ‘healthy’ adoptive family appeared to have a protective effect even for those at high genetic risk.
High-genetic-risk adoptees reared in families with low OPAS ratings were significantly less likely to have developed schizophrenia than high-genetic-risk adoptees reared in families with high OPAS ratings.
In adoptees at high genetic risk of S, but not in those at low genetic risk, adoptive-family stress was a significant predictor of the development of S.
What are the evaluative points?
Diathesis may not be exclusively genetic
Urban environments are not necessarily more stressful
Difficulties in determining casual stress
Limitations of the Tienari study
Implications for treatment.