AML /CFT frameworks Offshore Flashcards
Outline why offshore centres vulnerable to ML
Secrecy laws
Asset protection legislation
Products & Services
+legal persons
+legal arrangements
Outline issues facing secrecy laws & confidentiality provisions
& asset protection legislation
1) Difficult to achieve cross broader exchange of info for purposes to prevent & detect ML
Such laws hinder transparency / prevent info about suspicion reaching FIU / prevent investigations to detect / cannot share info to others
SARs & STRs violate professional secrecy / possible penalty imposed
2) ensure assets structure only attacked by local courts
More mostly for authorities outside jurisdiction to move attack / complex rules
Outline issued faced for products & services
Products that increase vulnerability offshore ;
Legal persons (incorp by law)
Legal arrangements (trust)
Provides opps to distance themselves from proceeds of crime & benefit also
Outline examples how extensive use of legal persons vulnerable to ML
Legal persons contract in own name
Extent of info available on registar varies between jurisdictions (info on BO at time of incorp but no obligations to update changes)
Often required to inform identify of shareholders/ use of nominees by offshore SP
Disclose RO address / SP address recorded / physical presence not necessarily there
Bearer shares render CDD
Difficulty regulator identifying human face of company, if owned by another, registered elsewhere or shares owned by arrangements
Outline examples how extensive use of legal arrangements vulnerable to ML
Existence not a matter of public record / benefit of info available only valuable as contained in TI/ ROM - minimal
Dummy settlors used / no longer prevalent in practice / DOT now used to conceal settlor
Class of beneficiaries used to conceal who benefits
Blind trusts / Use of well known charity as beneficiary / true appointed at later date
Outline ways of recognising ML / red flags
- receipt of unusual large cash deposits
- receipt of funds / followed by immediate request to be paid
- use of multiple transfers where single payments could have been used
- reluctant to receive payments directly
- requests for 3rd party receipts / payment without explanation
- use of multiple bank accounts or entities that don’t serve purpose / complicate structure = layering
- use of dummy settlors
- use of blind trust / legitimate use understood
- reluctant to provide usual CDD & direct contact
- lack of commercial rationale for structure
- client internet profile has adverse info involving financial crime
- lack of legal/ tax advice for complex structures - multiple entities or jurisdictions
- unexpected early repayment loans
- use of safe deposit boxes = no reasonable cause
- dealings with practices & parties locate well know terrorist/ crime areas
- purchase of insurance together with subsequent cancellation despite surrender values
- lack of concern over costs of transactions / don’t try to minimise costs
- lack of desire to receive reports on performance or balances
Outline impact of AML/ CFT legislation on admin environment offshore
- operate strict regulated environment
- maintain polices & procedures / CDD
- increase standards of documentation & revoked keeping to demonstrate compliance
- receive training
- work in org adequately staffed compliance department / MLRO - deal wth SARs
- resistance on long standing business relationships - info updates
- resistance on increased costs for work / bring files up to date
- requirement to undertake reg reviews of clients (periodic) / facilitate monitoring of transactions & CDD
- increased awareness & open sourced public info to monitor for adverse info in respect of customers