American Modernism Flashcards
background and context, "Of Modern Poetry", "In a Station of the Metro", "The Story of an Hour", The Harlem Renaissance, "I, Too, Sing America", "Black Woman"
Historical Context:
Period between WWI and WWII
-> “radical shift in aesthetic and cultural sensibilities evident in the art and literature of the post-WWI period.”…breaks with Victorian bourgeois morality and rejects “19th century optimism”, presenting a “profoundly pessimistic picture of a culture in diary.” - Christopher Keep and McLaughlin
Cultural context -> in 20th century:
-industrialization
-urbanization (many people leaving small towns to work in the big cities because there we have new technology and industrialization)
-complete secularization: God is no longer the center -> God is dead (Nietzsche)
-advances in sciences (relative theory)
-psychoanalysis (Freud: id, ego, super-ego)
-> life has changed dramatically and so has our perception -> if we can‘t completely understand ourselves (because of the id that‘s beyond logical thinking or cognitive capacities): How are we supposed to understand the world or anything beyond that? -> We can‘t get the full picture of the world and ourselves
-> Literary Reactions:
-alienation, doubt with form and language of its own:
- pessimism/disintegration: after WWI: Notion that there might be something nasty about mankind, things are falling apart
- fragmentation: you don‘t understand the world and just see it in parts (same goes for yourself)
- disillusionment, skepticism, despair: the world and humanity has problems, we don‘t know what‘s going on/what we should do
How does American Realism differ from American Modernism?
-American Realism followed verisimilitude: appearance of being true while exploring and representing life, giving true accounts on events with locations and people that are grounded in reality (literary contract)
-Realism in paintings: detailed account to paint full picture of (everyday) life -> pictures are therefore painted in details and shapes (to look almost photographic)
≠
-American Modernism: Fragmentation of reality due to the fact that we don‘t understand reality or ourselves fully -> yet often an attempt at putting those fragmented, unfitting pieces together: it shows that there is no way of mirroring “reality” -> so let‘s just put the fragments together in a way that they fit for a moment
-Modernism in Paintings: Picasso for example
Noteworthy:
-American Modernism followed American Realism
-> American Realism: From Civil War (1861-65) to turn of the century
Modernism comes as a reaction to the world. What are Modernism‘s core tenets?
-alienation, doubt with form and language of its own:
- losing faith because of the industrialisation
- pessimism/disintegration: after WWI: Notion that there might be something nasty about mankind, things are falling apart
- fragmentation: you don‘t understand the world and just see it in parts (same goes for yourself)
- disillusionment, skepticism, despair: the world and humanity has problems, we don‘t know what‘s going on/what we should do
Key features in American Modernist Literature (slogan: “Make it New!”):
-direct treatment of the thing: this thing is not shown in any kind of conventional fashion
-no conventional symbolism -> e.g. “a rose is a rose is a rose”: no other meaning behind a thing than the thing itself
-often concrete sensory image that sets the centre of the poem or text
-the modernist text does not give meaning: it is a searching for meaning
What type of poem is “Of Modern Poetry” by Wallace Stevens?
It‘s a metapoem: It is a poem that is about poetry (in this case modern poetry itself), asking:
-What does a modern poem look like?
-What does a modern poem have to achieve?
—> describing what poems should be like
What are the characteristics of a modernist poem according to Stevens?
- like a theatre with an invisible audience
IN DETAIL
-It has to move on from simply repeating what came before
-it is an endless act of finding meaning without ever sufficing: it is a process
-“an invisible audience that listens”: modern poetry looks at the world and then the audience listens/reads and looks at itself (in poetry, unlike in the theater, you don‘t see your audience -> the reader and the writer don‘t see each other -> an invisible audience does not listen to a play, but to itself
-at center is the turn to simple, ordinary, common things-> modernist poems don‘t desire to make things exaggerated/lather than they are: they treat/tackle common things in the world and treat them as such
What is the Theatrum Mundi metaphor running through the poem?
Theatrum mundi: a comparison without a word of comparing
In “Of Modern Poetry”: The world was like a theater (where the script was repeated over and over again), the past is now like a souvenir
—> life as a staged performance: human perception and imagination act as the directors shaping reality
—> poet as creator: both observer and participant in life’s grand theatre, highlighting the role of artistic expression
What is the moment of „sudden rightness“?
- find (in a process) a satisfaction living with people about thing of life
-> what writer does and audience (reader) thinks both comes together
–> two emotions becoming one; audience resonates with poem
IN DETAIL
Also called “moment of being (Virginia Wolff): All fragments momentarily resonate/connect with each other -> a process of understanding/ finding: said process of fragments becoming one happens in the mind -> ≠ in Transcendentalism and Romanticism: “it has no will to rise”: it is in the here and now, has no desire to go any further than that (e.g. such as ascending to the stars or a higher being).
Which shift do you see between the first and the second stanza of “Of Modern Poetry”?
The first stanza explains what poetry used to be (like a theatre for which the scene had a script that was repeated over and over again), the second stanza tells that the theatre is a different thing now and we cannot go on with these repetitions
Which metaphor is at the center of Steven‘s poem “Of Modern Poetry”?
The metaphor of poetry being like a theatre
What does Imagism mean and what role does the Haiku play in the poem “In a Station of the Metro” by Ezra Pound?
literary movement founded by Pound: emphasizes clarity, precision and direct presentation of images -> uses single image to convey immediate emotional and sensory experience
role of haiku: focus on fleeting moment of perception
IN DETAIL
Imagism:
-Name given to a movement in poetry, originating in 1912 and represented by poets such as Ezra Pound and Amy Lowell, aiming at clarity and expression through the use of precise visual images.
-Succinct verse of dry clarity and hard outline in which an exact visual image made a total poetic statement.
-≠ Symbolism: Symbolism had affinity with music, Imagism sought analogy with sculpture -> the visual is in the foreground and not the musical kind of association.
-> Imagism was influenced by:
Haiku:
-short poem that uses sensory language to capture a feeling or image
-often inspired by an element of nature, a moment of beauty or a poignant experience
-Haiku poetry was originally developed by Japanese poets, and the form was adapted to English and other languages by poets in other countries
Haiku‘s role in this particular poem:
“In a Station of the Metro” is a short poem that uses sensory language to capture a feeling or image by comparing it with imagery of nature (just like Haiku usually does): The sensorial moment of witnessing a crowd in the station of the metro is being compared with petals ok a wet, black bough.
Both, Imagism and Haiku, are influences for “In a Station of the Metro” by Ezra Pound.
What role does the title “In a Station of the Metro” play?
- modern urban setting -> contrast to natural imagery within poem
- sets stage, suggesting that even in a crowded, artificial moment/environment, moments of beauty and deeper meaning can be found
The title itself becomes part of the poem in a particular way -> without it, we wouldn‘t know where the moment (apparition of faces in the crowd) the poem describes is located (we are in a station of the metro)
Explain the general metaphor of “In a Station of the Metro”.
- comparison of faces in the metro station to petals on a wet black bough
–> delicate and transient beauty of human life within the mechanical and impersonal urban environment
IN DETAIL
The metaphor here: Tertium comparationis (latin for “the third part of the comparison”): Tells us the quality that two things which are compared to each other have in common.
-> Here: Apparition of faces in the crowd of a metro station: They are dark, clumped, together, just like Petals on a wet, black bough. -> Comparison between this very kind of moment of people coming together by chance on a metro station: It‘s a moment of beauty, hence it is compared to an image of nature.
What is missing grammatically in “In a Station of the Metro” and why is it important?
- absence of verbs –> seems like a sequence of two images without explanation
–> encourages interpretation and association
“The apparition of these faces in the crowd: Petals on a wet, black bough.” -> it doesn‘t have a verb, because it creates a visual image of a place we could imagine for ourselves, while closing our eyes.
The Story of an Hour, Kate Chopin, historical background
Suffrage Movement:
-1820-1925: Progressive Era -> Women from all classes enter public life, increasing politicization of women
-1920: 19th Amendment: American Women win full voting rights
-not only about full voting rights, but also more rights in marriage -> Emancipation of women in general