America Immigration Flashcards

1
Q

Describe the 1929 Immigration Act [2]

A

In 1929 only 120,000 immigrants a year were allowed into the USA and 85% of all places were reserved for Northern and Western Europeans.[1] This demonstrates that it was not necessarily the number of immigrants coming in that America’s objected to, but where they came from, making racism & prejudice a very important factor in understanding the changing attitudes towards immigration in the 1920s. President Coolidge said “America must be kept American”.[1]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe how religious prejudice in 1920s America led to immigration controls, specifically for Catholics [3]

A

Catholics: Before 1830, the USA had been almost exclusively Protestant but by 1860, the number of Catholics exceeded 3 million, which was one tenth of the population. A significant proportion of immigrants were Roman Catholic – Irish, Italians and Hispanics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain how German-Americans were affected by WW1 [3]

A

In 1917, there were around 8 million German-Americans living in the USA. At the outbreak of war, many were criticised for being too sympathetic towards the German Empire and were immediately suspected as sympathizers of the Kaiser. German-Americans were beaten, tarred and feathered. Families with German sounding surnames changed them e.g. Müller to Miller, Schmidt to Smith. The German dish of sauerkraut became known as ‘liberty cabbage’. German languages were stopped in colleges and schools.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain how Irish Americans were affected by WW1 [3]

A

During World War I, 4.5 million Irish-Americans lived in the USA.[1] Many harboured a deep-rooted hatred towards Britain due to the English oppression they had endured in Ireland since the 17th century.[1] Therefore, they were suspected as being dangerously anti-British and potentially anti-American saboteurs, especially if they were Catholic. [1]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe how American’s foreign policy adjusted following WW1 [2]

A

Involvement in World War I was a break in the tradition of US foreign policy. After World War I, most Americans were weary from fighting in a world war - 117,465 Americans had died & 205,690 were wounded.[1] Most Americans wanted a return to isolationism, which can be shown through the refusal of the USA to join the League of Nations (an organisation that had been suggested by the President Wilson in the first place). They were afraid that membership of the League of Nations would involve them permanently in the affairs of Europe.[1] Senator Henry Cabot Lodge, Leader of the Republican opposition to President Wilson [Democrat], successfully led the campaign against the League. Republicans were hostile to Wilson anyway, but they were also concerned to protect American sovereignty and the freedom to act independently. They argued that the decision to go to war should rest solely with the US Congress and not with the League.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

List the 4 immigration acts introduced around 1920s America [4]

A

Immigration law 1917 (Literacy Acts- proof to read English)
Emergency Quota Act 1921
National Orgins Act 1924
Immigration Act 1929 (dates needed for marks)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe the human cost of WW1 for America [2]

A

After World War I, most Americans were weary from fighting in a world war - 117,465 Americans had died & 205,690 were wounded.[1] Most Americans wanted a return to isolationism, which can be shown through the refusal of the USA to join the League of Nations (an organisation that had been suggested by the President Wilson in the first place). They were afraid that membership of the League of Nations would involve them permanently in the affairs of Europe.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe the 1917 Immigration Law [1]

A

It required that all immigrants prove that they could read English

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe the Emergency Immigration Law Act [3]

A

1921 [1] allowed only about 350,000 immigrants to enter the USA every year.[1] By carefully organising a quota system, the American Government could make sure that large numbers of people from ‘undesirable’ countries were kept out. This law imposed an annual limit on immigration from any European Country, limiting it to 3% of the number of nationals from that country who were living in the USA in 1911.[1]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe the National Origins Act [3]

A

In 1924, Congress passed the National Origins Act [Johnson-Reed Act], with little opposition. This Act drastically cut down the total of immigrants e.g the proportion from each country allowed to enter the USA each year was lowered to 2% based on the sizes of national groups at the time of the 1890 census and set an absolute limit of 150,000 immigrants per annum. [1] 85% of quotas favoured those from Northern and Western Europe and forbade all Oriental immigration – marked in Japan by a day of National mourning. However, the Act did not apply to Mexicans, as cheap labour was needed during the times of fruit harvest. The law aimed at freezing the country ethnically by sharply restricting the ‘new’ immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe. [1]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain why hatred against 3 American groups increased due to WW1 [2]

A

World War I sped up the process of the movement to limit immigration. During the war, everything was done to ‘sell’ Americans the war and generate hatred towards the Germans. Soon, anyone and anything that smacked of foreign culture became suspect, and patriotism often degenerated into an ugly xenophobia. [1]

World War I revealed that many immigrants in the USA still had some lingering sympathies for their mother country. This of course was a double standard as many ‘old immigrant’ Americans, still talked fondly about Scotland, which was considered acceptable. Former president Theodore Roosevelt denounced “hyphenated Americanism”, insisting that dual loyalties were impossible in wartime [1]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain immigrant demographics in 1920s America [2]

A

The majority of immigrants settled in four large cities: Chicago, Boston, Pittsburgh & New York. These immigrants ‚enclaves‛ became identified by names such as Little Italy, Irishtown and Chinatown.[1] They wanted to be close to other people who spoke their language & felt safer in their own communities who continued the traditions and customs of their home countries. They had their own shops selling their own food, their own forms of entertainment and sometimes their own schools. It was estimated that New York City had twice the number of Irish that Dublin had and more Italians than lived in Naples. Chicago had the largest number of Czechs than anywhere else in the world and the third largest number of poles after Warsaw and Lodz (which are in Poland).
The Irish dominated Boston, the Czechs and Poles-Chicago and the Italians took over Brooklyn in New York.
In 1970 the Reverend Jesse Jackson gave an interview to ‘Ebony’ magazine, in which he said America was not a “melting pot” but a “soup with the chopped ingredients visible as separate bits”. By this he meant that people in urban areas lived in separate districts for separate ethnic groups such as ‘Little Italy’ and ‘China Town’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How did immigration housing lead to an oucry amongst working class ‘native’ Americans? [2]

A

Immigrants had little money and received low wages so could only afford to live in atrocious conditions, in the cheapest housing in the worst areas of the city. Whole families, sometimes 10 or 12 people lived in one room. They were damp, dark and filthy with no water supply, toilets or drains - rubbish and sewage was thrown into backcourts or streets. However, landlords could still put rents up due to the high competition. Poor Americans were angered by the increased pressure put on already scarce housing by the arrival of immigrants, especially in the poorer areas of the city. This resulted in natives becoming hostile towards immigrants as they struggled to get a home. The areas in which they lived became run down and overcrowded: ghettoes. Immigrants were blamed for these poor conditions which made the country less desirable to live in, even though in reality it was the responsibility of the city authorities rather than the immigrants.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain how crime infused hatred against immigration? Do not mention prohibition [2]

A

The increasing population of cities was accompanied by social problems such as rising crime. The soaring crime rates in neighbourhoods with high concentrations of immigrants were used by journalists, reformers and politicians who favoured restricting immigration as proof of the bad influence of immigrants on their environment. Out of the 17,328 persons arrested in New York in 1858 14,638 were foreigners, 10,477 of these were Irish. In 1910s and 1920s, Italian immigrants were thought to be connected to the Mafia, and high profile gangsters like Al Capone seemed to confirm this image.
Charity organisations and social workers were more realistic in acknowledging that terrible living conditions, sickness, fear and loneliness were the real causes of crime. Most of the immigrant arrests were for crimes of poverty such as drunkenness, vagrancy or petty theft. Social workers argued that the thief who stole small amounts of food, clothing or money was desperately attempting to cope with poverty and hopelessness, rather than responding to an innate criminality. The facts suggest that the criminality of foreign born in America was no larger than that of the native population. Yet the myth of immigrant criminality persisted. This shows America already had preconceived judgements about people of a certain nationality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain how immigrants were linked to prohibition[3]

A

Many ‘native’ Americans despised the lifestyle of certain immigrant groups especially the Germans and Italians whose cultural traditions involved what seemed to be the large consumption of alcohol. This offended the rigid sensitivities of the native immigrants. As early as 1820s Puritans saw their Sabbaths ignored by drunken Irish navvies fighting, swearing and gambling in the slums of Boston and New York. They regarded the immigrants as lower class.
A growing temperance lobby pushed for a law prohibiting the sale and consumption of alcohol. In 1919 the Volstead Act prohibiting the sale and consumption of alcohol in the USA was passed. Prohibition ended after 12 years when it became apparent that it’s impact had led to a rise in organised crime, bloodshed and no real change in attitudes
Many of the communities that became involved with the illegal trade in alcohol – either through imports of bootlegged alcohol or through illegal brewing - were based in immigrant communities: Catholic-Irish in New Jersey, European Jewish immigrants in New York and Italians in Chicago. This provided work for many new or recent immigrants, but also set them firmly on a path of crime, which only added to the stereotypes held about immigrants.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain how competition for jobs fuelled hatred against immigration [3]

Note: Unions could also be advocated as holding back the American Dream + linked to immigration. It was believed you were a communist if you were a member of a trade union (Link to the 1st Red Scare), especially in the South trade unions were frowned upon.

A

During the First World War the American economy had gone through a boom with approximately 9 million people working in war industries such as steel, wheat fields (food for allies) & munitions factories, while another 4 million were serving in the armed forces. When the war ended, wartime industries reduced production resulting in people losing jobs and war industries were left without contracts. As factories closed and people lost their jobs, unemployment more than doubled from 5.2% to 11.7% by 1921. Troops returned home seeking jobs in the already saturated labour market. There was increased anger towards the seemingly endless pool of cheap labour provided by immigrants and they were blamed for ‘stealing jobs’. Most of the ‘new’ immigrants were unskilled and therefore looked for work in America’s growing industries in the cities.
There was a belief that those immigrants who could not speak English seemed to be taking American jobs. Many of these immigrants were unskilled and desperate for work; therefore, they were willing to work long hours, for low pay in harsh working conditions. The acceptance of these poor working and living conditions angered poor, native-born Americans who believed that the abundance of cheap immigrant labour kept wages low and condemned them to poverty and terrible conditions along with immigrants. Trade unions believed that Italian or Polish workers who were prepared to work for longer hours and for lower wages wrecked anything they did to improve conditions or wages. Employers would not negotiate with trade unions to improve working conditions because there was a wealth of workers who would accept the current pay & conditions. Industrialists, on the other hand, relished the abundance of cheap, unskilled labour for their factories: many of these jobs were so dangerous, dirty or low paid that ‘Americans’ would not do them.

17
Q

Explain how immigrants acted as ‘strikebreakers’, leading to anti-immigration laws [3]

A

Following World War I, ‘American’ labour went on strike as emerging trade unions fought for better wages, shorter working hours and better conditions. Because the immigrant population was desperate for money, many were employed as strikebreakers to replace the strikers.
Trade unions resented the ‘new’ immigrants because they had no bargaining power when employers knew that they could always use cheap immigrants to break their strikes. Trade unions even backed the idea of a literacy test for immigrants believing that many unskilled workers would be denied entry into the USA, freeing up jobs for Americans. Indeed the idea of the literacy test for immigrants was debated 32 times in Congress prior to its introduction in 1917. [3]

18
Q

Explain how the ‘Red Scare’ contributed to anti-immigration consensus in 1920s America [6]

A

Immigrants found themselves under attack for political reasons. Many were believed to be Communists or anarchists who wanted to copy the Russian Revolution of 1917 which had established the first Communist state in the world.
As ‘new immigrants’ from Russia continued to arrive in large numbers following the First World War this created a fear that they were also bringing with them the politics of murder and revolution. It is estimated that there were over 150,000 anarchists or communists in the USA in 1920, which represented only 0.1% of the overall population of the USA. One journalist said that the whole lot were about as dangerous as “a flea on an elephant”. Despite this, many Americans were terrified of a communist revolution in the USA like that in Russia.
Following World War I, many Americans were scared by the pro-Russian leanings of new organisations in the USA such as: the International Workers of the World and the ‘American Socialist Party’. This led them open to attack. Any activity associated with them was suspicious. There was an almost irrational fear of communism, anarchism and socialism. This led to further intolerance and suspicion towards immigrants and convinced many Americans to demand that action be taken to stop the flow of revolutionaries into the country. Local police departments and the Federal Justice Department harassed those who supported Socialist or Communist ideas.
The fear of Communist revolution coupled with the economic recession set off the ‘Red Scare’ period. Following World War I, a series of strikes seemed to confirm the ‘Red’ threat. They led many to believe that a revolution was imminent. On 21st Jan 1919 35,000 shipyard workers in Seattle went on strike. By February 6th this increased to 60,000. Despite the absence of any violence or arrests, the strikers were immediately labelled as ‘Reds’ and were charged with trying to incite revolution. Violent strikes and riots soon followed in other industries such as the textile, railroad, steel and coal industries. The press reported that these strikes were “conspiracies against the government”, and ‚plots to establish Communism‛, further creating this idea of a ‘red scare’. On September 9th 1919, the Boston police force went on strike. A panic that “Reds” were behind the strike took over Boston and the policemen were called ‚agents of Lenin‛. On September 13th 1919, Police Commissioner Edwin Curtis announced that the striking policemen would not be allowed to return and that the city would hire a new police force, effectively ending the strike!

19
Q

Explain how the Palmer Raids ensued in attitudes against immigration in 1920s America [4]

A

Communist fears: Palmer Raids – August 1919
The house of Attorney General, Mitchell Palmer, was blown up. Palmer, an ambitious man who one day wanted to be President, believed that taking an anti-Communist and anti-anarchist stand would make him popular. He said the bombing was the work of a radical element and pledged to purge it by whatever steps were necessary. Palmer thought he would find many of these radicals in the immigrant community.
Palmer set up the General Intelligence Division within the Department of Justice, run by his assistant J. Edgar Hoover. This division spied on Communists and others considered dangerous. In January 1920, Hoover’s agents and local police organised raids on Communists in 33 cities, arresting 6,000 ‘foreign radicals’ and putting them in jail without trial. They were held in filthy conditions, were beaten up and forced to sign confessions. Most had to be released due to lack of evidence, however, 600 people were deported. Palmer then warned of a May Day demonstration, organised police and special troops but the riot did not happen and people lost faith in him.
The hysteria passed almost as suddenly as it began. The Bolshevik (Communist) threat had been exaggerated. Most immigrants were too preoccupied with adjusting to their new environment to consider subversive political activity of any kind. However, the Palmer Raids showed that WASP America felt threatened by the arrival of new political ideas and shows the move to isolate themselves further.

20
Q

Explain how the case of Sacco and Vanzetti led to a disapproval of immigration [4]

A

Distrust over people with different ideas and who came from South-eastern Europe reached its peak with the trial of Italian immigrants Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti. They were anarchists and held radical, revolutionary ideas leading some people to think they might be Communists.
On May 5th 1920, Sacco and Vanzetti were arrested in Massachusetts. They were charged with murdering two men during an armed robbery. They spoke no English, but were found carrying guns. Their lawyer put forward the defence that they were elsewhere when the robbery took place and claimed they were being persecuted for their well-known political beliefs. There was little concrete evidence against them and many Americans felt the two men would be found guilty, not because they were robbers and murderers, but because they were immigrants and had strong radical ideas about changing the US political system. The judge in the case privately called them ‘those anarchist bastards’. Vanzetti himself said in April 1927, ‘I am suffering because I am a radical. Indeed I am a radical. I have suffered because I was an Italian. Indeed, I am an Italian‛. They were found guilty and sentenced to death. Many people believed that the two men were innocent and despite serious doubts and a massive worldwide campaign, they were executed in the electric chair in 1927.
This shocked many people in the liberal minded north of the USA who believed that in a democracy all people should be free to believe what they wanted. However many in rural America supported the executions as they believed that anyone who wanted to change the American political system was already guilty and should be hanged. They were coming to believe that the cities were filled with ‘foreigners’ who would not adopt the American ways and were determined to overthrow the American way of life.