Alles Flashcards
The history of cultural sociology
1930s-1960s culture as part of structural functionalism
1965-1980s culture not adressed
1980s-current cultural turn
Traingle of structural functionalism (system level)
Cultural system: shared morals and values
social system: roles and expectations
personality system: needs and motivations
pasonian sociology sees culture as ____
shared values
Structural functionalism, what is the ‘real essence’ of society?
Stability -> social patterns contribute to stability, society is maintained.
Harmony -> The parts of society work together for the good of the whole.
Evolution -> Social structue and culture adopt to new needs and demands. if something is dysfunctional for the society it will be eliminated.
The functional approach thinks of society as a ___
organism.
Talcott parsons studies the cultural system via _____
meanings. Meanings, not people, are part of the process that brings us into the cultural systems, These meanings (language, morals, values) and the socialization process that accompany them help to maintain social control. Sociol control is the glue that holds society together.
Critique parsonian sociology
- culture as to consensual, no conflict or opposition. to holistic.
- culture as too ‘derterminitstic’ people are cultural dopes.
- culture as to abstarct, general, idealistic. a free floating realm of values.
The cultural turn
new conceptions of culture which avoid problems of culture as ‘values’.
It focuses on:
- concrete culture (text, language, symbols etc)
- context (grounding)
- culture as contradictory and complicated
Three new approaches in cultural sociology
culture as cognitive structure
culture in action
production of culture
How do sociologist see culture now?
they treat as culture all socially located forms and practices of human meaning making.
production of culture
focus on how the content of culture is influenced by the milieux in which it is created, distributed, evaluated. How culture is made, culture as the dependent value.
Culture as cognitive structure is partly influenced by ___
Durkheim
Durkheim the elementary forms of religious life: sacred/profane
All religious divide social life in to two spheres: sacred/profane. There is nothing intrinsic about a particular object which makes it sacred, an object becomes sacred only when a community invests it with meaning.
Religion according to Durkheim is _____
A unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things, things set apart from the forbidden
Totemisim
The most foundational form of religion. A community makes a non-human object it’s symbol and the community thinks of that object as sacred. they worship the totem, thereby revering themselves as a community. They are in fact worshipping the community.
Collective efferveressence
With the totem at the center of the rituals, the share an intense emotions at collective gatherings.
Durkheim: function of religion
Provide a sense of special belonging, bonding.
Make the religious community think of itself as sacred.
Why the need for sacred totems?
collective representation and a symbol to prolong feelings of group membership.
Agency in culture
agency is the capacity of individuals to act independently and to make their own free choices. Soooo how people actively and reflexively use culture
Related founding father of culture in action ___
a CRITIQUE on Weber
How did the protestant ethic lead to capitalism? (according to weber)
First people who live a religious life often turned away from money and business but calvinism changed that. Calvinism encouraged an other attitude to work. Calvinists believed that there was a fixed number of souls that could enter heaven, and they were terrified of not getting in, they wanted a sign that they had been saved. A sure sign that someone was on ‘the guest list’ was that they were actively contributing to the community, THROUGH THEIR WORK!!!! They needed to reassure themselves through the industry and invested every surplus back into their business. This al resulted in the rise and growth of capitalism!!!! the end!!!
Weber’s model of cultural structure on action
culture defines ‘ends’ towards which action is orientated and constraint the ‘means’ to achieve them.
Problems with the weberian model
unexamined lifes: people often continue lines of action out of habit, not out of reflextion.
definition of culture: culture is not just means to an end, it is embedded in action itself.
cultural complexity: to which culture do we belong?
cultural distance: some ideas we hold ‘deeply’ and others more on the surface
Marx, media as means of production
the mass media are a ‘means of production’ which in capitalist society is in the hands of the ruling class. The class which has the means of material production at it’s disposal has control over the means of mental production.
cognitive sociology x structuralism = culture as cognitive structure
cognitive:
meaning is not subjective, individaulistic or particular.
meaning resides in ‘objective’ cultural structues.
structuralism:
meaning can be studied ‘objectively’, it is concrete visible, recordable in texts, symbols, stories, objects, events
Meaning is relatively autonomous: has a structure and logic of its own; aim is to decode the logic
Cognitive sociology has _____ origens
Durkheim. ‘our fundamental forms of thought have socia origins.
you are shaped by society while simultaneously shaping society.
(Critiques structuralism)
Ahistorical, Difference
Zerubavel uses cognitive sociology to explain ____
Why our thinking is similar to -as well as different from- the way other people think. Uses social aspects of cognitive functions such as mental focusing and classification
Cognitive pluralism
If you are a member of multiple thought communities
What causes cognitive pluralism?
Specialization and secularization
Why is contemporary culture and cognition different then durkheims?
The contemporary focus is on thinking individually, but what we do cognitively have in common
Zerubavel; Mental focusing
mentaly disengages ‘the figure’ from it’s surrounding ‘ground’ (which we essentially ignore).
Zerubavel; We are not just acting as individuals but as
members of particular thought communities
Zerubavel; how we carve up reality in 3 mindsets
Rigid mindedness: either/or
flexible mindedness: both/and
fuzzy mindedness: no real boundaries
structuralism
deep structure of culture, logical relations among a few elements. reduce surface complexity with deep simplicity.
Saussure
relation between signifier and signified is arbitrary. Words have meaning because of difference from other words. Also language and parole
The structural analysis of myth
1 What are the basic elements: mythemes
= gross constituent units
2 How are they combined and related = structure of myth
3 Synchronic and diachronic reading of the myth
Binder, frames
‘schemata of interpretation that enable individuals to locate, perceive, identify and label events they have experienced directly or indirectly’
Frames ‘resonate’ with broader cultural beliefs in society at large
Invoking ‘referent images’ to make story convincible
Frames used on heavy metal vs rap
metal: corruption and protection frame, referent image is our own children, white middle age.
Rap: danger to society frame, referent image is young urban balck male
Main criticism on culture as cognitive structure
where are agency/reflexivity and conflict?
Culture in action
how interactionsand social practicesare themselves meaning-making processes.
the context-dependentways in which individuals and groups endow actions with meanings
relaxes the assumption that meanings and values are entirely shared, coherent, or consistentfor a given group or even an individual
analyzing how individuals and groups draw fluidly on different elementsin symbolic repertoires (“toolkits”) according to context
Diffences between culture in action and culture as a cognitive structure, elaborate
Culture as cognitive structure:
- Coherence: strong emphasis on logic of culture
- Autonomy: internal structure of culture
- Rather deterministic: cultural structures impel us to think in particular ways
Culture in action:
- Fragmentation: culture as a toolkit
- Grounding: cultural meaning as grounded in practical demands of everyday life
- Agency: active, reflexive uses of culture in contexts
sociological problem of culture and actions?
What do we actually mean when we say that group A does B because of their culture?
How does culture matter?
How is culture related to our actions of everyday life?
Differences between culture in action and culture as a cognitive structure, short
Fragmentation VS coherence
Grounded in particular context VS autonomy
Agency VS structure
Culture as a repetoire or toolkit
culture as equipment to act with - capacities, practical skills, habits, lines of action to solve practical problems
Swidler, the large question
how much culture people use, how much they intigrate it with their experience, how coherent or unified the culture is they employ