All Quiz questions Done Flashcards
Which of the following is not an essential element of negligence?
A. A duty of care is owed to the negligent person.
B. A breach of the duty of care owed to the plaintiff
C. The victim suffers loss
D. A duty is care is owed to the victim
E. The victim’s loss was caused by he who breached the duty
A. A duty of care is owed to the negligent person.
Select the most accurate assertion about negligence:
A. We owe a legal duty to anyone who suffers loss as a result of our negligent act.
B. We owe a legal duty to anyone negatively affected by our negligent act.
C. We owe a legal duty to anyone who we can reasonably foresee might be harmed by something we do.
D. We owe a legal duty to anyone who we can reasonably foresee will certainly be harmed by something we do.
E. We owe a legal duty not to say anything that we can reasonably foresee might cause damage to someone if they are subject to the “but for” test.
C. We owe a legal duty to anyone who we can reasonably foresee might be harmed by something we do.
Which one is different? A. Fair comment B. Qualified privilege C. Fiduciary duty D. Truth E. Absolute privilege
C. Fiduciary duty
Which one is different? A. Passing off B. Inducing breach of contract C. Negligent misstatement D. Fraudulent misrepresentation E. Assault
C. Negligent misstatement
Which one is different? A. Breach of contract B. Inducing breach of contract C. Libel D. Assault E. Negligence
A. Breach of contract
Which one is different? A. Causation B. Damages C. Duty of care D. Breach of duty of care E. Defamation
E. Defamation
Which one is different? A. Contributory negligence B. Inducing breach of contract C. Volenti D. Tort not committed during the course of employment. E. No damage caused
B. Inducing breach of contract
Peter is the marketing manager and a director of Waterland Works Ltd. (WWL) which is in the business supplying and installing fountains in residential and commercial buildings across Canada. His wife tells him about a mall developer who is looking to install several fountains in a mega-mall. His wife gave the developer Peter’s business card. After meeting the developer, he quits his job, sets up his own company to supply and install fountains and then enters into a contract to do so with the mall developer. Peter had no written employment agreement with WWL. Peter is…
A. in breach of an implied term of his employment agreement not to compete with his former employer.
B. liable for the tort of inducing breach of contract between the mall developer and WWL.
C. not in breach of his fiduciary duty to WWL because the information about the mall developer originated with his wife.
D. in breach of his fiduciary duty to WWL because he met with the mall developer before he quit his job.
E. liable to WWL for the tort of negligence because he could reasonably foresee that if contracted with the developer he would cause financial damage to WWL.
D. in breach of his fiduciary duty to WWL because he met with the mall developer before he quit his job.
T/F: If a lawyer handles a transaction the same way as other competent lawyers have handled it in the past and the transaction goes wrong, he cannot be successfully sued for negligence.
F
T/F: If an accountant draws up financial statements for a company so that the company can seek financing from a bank, the accountant can be liable to the bank for her own negligence even though she has no contract with the bank.
T
T/F: Vicarious liability means liability for other people’s actions.
T
T/F
Vicarious liability occurs through the fault of the employer.
F
T/F
Passing off refers to the tort of passing a vehicle in a prohibited lane.
F
T/F
Parents are vicariously liable for the torts of their children.
F
T/F
If a professional gives wrong advice he or she is strictly liable.
F
T/F
A professional can be held liable to a third party for negligent misstatement even though that third party is not the professional’s client or customer.
T
T/F
We are liable to those who we can reasonably foresee will be damaged by our careless acts.
T
T/F
To be characterized as discrimination the conduct can be intentional or unintentional.
T
T/F
An employer’s rule requiring pilots to have 20/20 vision would constitute discrimination if it were proved through reliable research that 20/40 vision was sufficient for competent, safe operation of aircraft.
F
T/F
The B.C. Human Rights Code prohibits harassment.
F