ALL QUESTIONS, ALL SUBJECTS - RANDOMIZED Flashcards
What is the well-pleaded complaint rule?
The federal question must be INTEGRAL (part and parcel) to the plaintiff’s cause of action, as revealed by plaintiff’s properly-pleaded complaint (i.e. what one would naturally and appropriately plead in a complaint)
When may a plaintiff aggregate claims together to satisfy the AIC requirement?
1) Multiple plaintiffs - NO. Each plaintiff must have a claim or claims totaling more than $75K, UNLESS JOINT INTEREST (e.g. A and B jointly own Blackacre and defendant trespasses, and A and B each claim $40K in damages)
2) Single defendant - YES. A plaintiff who has multiple claims against a single defendant may aggregate claims to meet the AIC requirement
3) Multiple defendants - NO. A plaintiff may not aggregate claims against multiple defendants. The AIC requirement must be met against each defendant individually.
Define pendent jurisdiction
Supplemental jurisdiction: a plaintiff asserts a jurisdictionally proper claim and tacks on another claim that does not have an independent basis for jurisdiction.
What is the amount in controversy requirement for diversity actions?
To meet the AIC requirement, plaintiff must have a GOOD FAITH claim EXCEEDING $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs.
Define complete diversity
The parties to the left of the “v” have completely different domiciles from the parties to the right of the “v” (NO OVERLAP)
How is the citizenship of non-resident US citizens determined?
U.S. citizens NOT DOMICILED in the U.S. is neither a citizen of any state nor an alien. Thus, U.S. Citizens NOT DOMICILED in the U.S. cannot sue or be sued in federal court with diversity as basis for subject matter jurisdiction
When is diversity determined?
Diversity is determined at the time the suit is filed / where the parties were domiciled at the commencement of the lawsuit (i.e. the day the action is filed in federal court)
What are the requirements for diversity of citizenship jurisdiction?
Plaintiff must show:
complete diversity;
AND
satisfy AIC requirement
What is the test for supplemental jurisdiction?
The claim must share a “common nucleus of operative fact” with the claim that satisfied federal subject matter jurisdiction and got the case into federal court in the first place.
The test is always satisfied if the additional claims arise out of the same transaction or occurrence (unless the plaintiff, in a case in which federal subject matter jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship, tries to tack on a pendent claim which destroys diversity).
Are there any limitations on the use of ancillary and supplemental jurisdiction?
YES AND NO (CONSIDER SUPPLEMENTAL V ANCILLARY JURISDICTION)
ANCILLARY
NO: Any party OTHER THAN the plaintiff may overcome lack of complete diversity or amount in controversy in both diversity and federal question cases.
SUPPLEMENTAL
YES: A federal court may refuse/decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction for any of the following reasons:
1) State law claim predominates: the state law claim substantially predominates over the claim or claims over which the federal court has jurisdiction
2) Complex claim of state law - the claim raises a novel or complex issue of state law
3) Original claim dismissed - the federal court has dismissed all claims over which it had original jurisdiction
4) Other compelling reasons or exceptional circumstances
What types of cases will a federal court not hear even if there is diversity jurisdiction?
Divorce, alimony, child custody (family law), or PROBATE of estate (and, these are not cases involving federal questions; these are state law cases governed by state law)
What are the bases for subject matter jurisdiction in federal court?
CAN be based on
1) a federal question properly pleaded in the complaint; or
2) diversity of citizenship.
Define “subject matter jurisdiction”
The court’s power over the subject matter of the lawsuit.
How is the citizenship of individuals determined?
By DOMICILE–a person’s true, fixed, and permanent home.
Must have PRESENCE and INTENT TO REMAIN.
How is citizenship determined in representative actions?
1) Historically, citizenship is based on the domicile of the REPRESENTATIVE (consider unincorporated associations).
2) Exception for when the REPRESENTED are a) minors, b) incompetents, and c) decedents. In that case, citizenship is based on the domicile of the REPRESENTED.
c) In class actions, citizenship is based on the domicile of the NAMED MEMBERS OF THE CLASS.