All Con Law Flashcards
The Supreme Court has sole, original jurisdiction in cases which:
_______________
The Supreme Court has sole, original jurisdiction in cases which:
- A state is a party
Congress has given lower federal courts concurrent jurisdiction in cases which affect ambassadors, public ministers, consuls, etc., though the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in those cases as well.
The Supreme Court may hear cases that come from state courts where:
I. _______________
II. _______________
The Supreme Court may hear cases that come from state courts where:
I) Constitutionality of a federal statute/treaty or state statute is in issue
II) A State statute allegedly violates federal law
When considering a question of Ripeness, federal court considers:
I. _______________
II. _______________
When considering a question of Ripeness, federal court considers:
I. the Fitness of the issues for judicial decision
II. the Hardship to the parties of withholding court consideration.
The Supreme Court will not exercise jurisdiction if the state court judgment is based on _______ and ________ grounds, even if federal issues are involved.
The Supreme Court will not exercise jurisdiction if the state court judgment is based on adequate and independent grounds, even if federal issues are involved.
A federal court will abstain from resolving a constitutional claim when the disposition rests on an _________ question of state law.
Unsettled.
A federal court will abstain from resolving a constitutional claim when the disposition rests on an unsettled question of state law.
A federal court will not decide Political Questions. These are issues which are :
I. _______________.
II. _______________.
A federal court will not decide Political Questions. These are issues which are :
I. Constitutionally committed to another branch of government
II. Inherently incapable of judicial resolution
The ___________ prohibits federal courts from hearing a private party’s/foreign governments claims against a State government.
11th Amendment
The 11th Amendment prohibits federal courts from hearing a private party’s/foreign governments claims against a State government.
The 11th Amendment establishes immunity for States and shields States from being sued by private parties.
Speech may be punished or banned under the clear and present danger test whenever it is __________________ and is likely to __________________.
Speech may be punished or banned under the clear and present danger test whenever it is directed to producing or inciting imminent lawless action and is likely to produce such action.
A ______________ forum is public property that historically has been open to speech-related activity.
A public forum is public property that historically has been open to speech-related activity. Examples include sidewalks and public parks.
A ____________ forum is public property that usually is not used for speech-related activity, but that the government has opened for such activity at particular times.
A designated public forum is public property that usually is not used for speech-related activity, but that the government has opened for such activity at particular times (e.g., a public school gym that can be reserved by the public for use when not being used by the school).
A ____________ forum is public property that usually is not used for speech-related activity, but that the government has opened up for such activity for a particular purpose.
A limited public forum is public property that usually is not used for speech-related activity, but that the government has opened up for such activity for a particular purpose (e.g., a school gym that has been opened up to host a political debate).
To be valid, a time, place, and manner regulation of a limited public forum must be __________ neutral and ________ related to a ___________ government purpose.
Viewpoint neutral and rationally related to a legitimate government purpose.
To be valid, a time, place, and manner regulation of a limited public forum must be viewpoint neutral and rationally related to a legitimate government purpose.
________ neutral regulations cannot permit presentation of one side of an argument and exclude the other.
Viewpoint neutral regulations: cannot permit presentation of one side of an argument and exclude the other.
Would it be valid under the establishment clause for a public school to allow for voluntary moment of silent prayer or meditation at the beginning of the school day?
No, because the moment would be viewed to promote religion.
It does not matter that the moment would be voluntary, or that the moment would be silent.
Would it be valid under the establishment clause for a public school to allow posting the Ten Commandments in a public school, pursuant to the local legislature’s declaration that the posting would be for a secular purpose?
No, the Supreme Court ruled that this program clearly served a religious purpose in spite of the legislature’s statement.
Would it be valid under the establishment clause for a public school to allow a program where, once a week, the school day ends an hour early so interested students may participate in voluntary religious classes in a separate location from the school?
Yes, this program would be valid.
However, a similar program held in the school itself has been struck down, because turning the classrooms over to religious instructors was found to promote religion.
When may the sincerity of an individual’s religious beliefs be inquired into by a court?
The sincerity of the parent’s religious beliefs is a factor that can be inquired into as a way of determining whether she can avail herself of the protection of the Free Exercise Clause.
The Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, prohibits punishing people for their religious beliefs. When a person claims that she is being punished for her religious beliefs, the court may consider whether the person challenging the law sincerely holds those beliefs. Thus, the court may consider whether the parent’s beliefs are sincerely held.
Per the one person, one vote principle, congressional districts must be ___________________________ with one another within a state.
Per the one person, one vote principle, congressional districts must be in almost exact mathematical equality with one another within a state.
The rationale is that voting is a fundamental right, diluting one person’s vote compared to another’s raises equal protection concerns, and there is no compelling interest that would justify more than a couple of percentage points difference from district to district.
Per the One Person, One Vote principle, the variance between state government districts must ___________________________.
Per the one person, one vote principle, the variance between state government districts must not be unjustifiably large.
But this is a much more lenient standard than the almost exact mathematical equality standard.
Laws which prohibit non-residents from voting in local elections must meet what level of scrutiny?
A. Rational Basis Scrutiny
B. Intermediate Scrutiny
C. Strict Scrutiny
A. Rational Basis
Although the right to vote is a fundamental right, laws prohibiting nonresidents from voting are generally valid, provided that they meet the minimal scrutiny, or “rational basis,” standard.
Under this standard, a law will be upheld as long as it is rationally related to a legitimate government interest.
Limiting the voters in a city’s mayoral election to residents of the city serves the interests of efficiency and prevents persons with little personal interest in the city from voting.
Under ____________________, a government action involving classification of persons will be subject to Strict Scrutiny if a suspect classification is involved.
the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
A government action involving classification of persons will be struck down under the EPC of the 14th Amendment, unless the government proves it is necessary to achieve a compelling government interest, per Strict Scrutiny review.