Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Law making > all cases for law making and tort > Flashcards

all cases for law making and tort Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
MBE flashcards MPRE flashcards Civil Procedure 1L flashcards
1
Q

nuisance case canary wharf

A

hunter (TV signal not nuisance, have to have direct interest in the property)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

nuisance go karting case

A

tetley

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

nuisance strangers blocking pipe case

A

sedleigh denfield

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

nuisance council and gypsies case

A

page motors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

nuisance locality case

A

sturges, bermondsey vs belgrave sqaure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

nuisance sex shop case

A

laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

nuisance industrial area case

A

st helens smelting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

nuisance individual cricket ball case

A

bolton

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

nuisance faulty wiring case

A

spicer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

nuisance smell case

A

adams, fish and chip shop

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

nuisance case for temporary interference

A

crown river cruise, 20 min firework display

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

nuisance damage to washing case

A

halsey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

nuisance public interest cricket case

A

miller

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

nuisance brown paper sensitivity of claimant case

A

robinson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

nuisance foreseeability recording studio railway case

A

morris

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

nuisance revenge music lessons case

A

christie

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

nuisance neighbour and rot case

A

bradburn, can be liable if font prevent a nuisance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

tort defences toilet cubicle case

A

sayers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

tort defences 100% negligence case

A

jayes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

tort defences seatbelt case

A

froom.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

tort defences smoking case

A

badger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

tort defences no choice but to accept the risk

A

baker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

tort defences falling pig case

A

gledhill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

tort defences football case

A

condon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

tort defences warning not sufficient case

A

rae

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

tort defences obvious danger algae case

A

staples

27
Q

defences yo tort planning permission case

A

wheeler

28
Q

tort defences prescription case

A

lawrence

29
Q

tort defences c coming to the nuisance case

A

lawrence

30
Q

tort defences social utility case

A

lawrence

31
Q

defences to tort consent for rylands and fletcher case

A

peters

32
Q

defences to tort act of a stranger case

A

perry

33
Q

defences to tort act of god case

A

nichols

34
Q

defences to tort wrongful act of a third party case

A

styrene

35
Q

judicial precedent, case where parliament had to make a new act for supreme court to change decision

A

london street tramways

36
Q

judicial precedent, case 1 overruled case 2 for occupiers liability for tresspassers

A

herrington overruled addie

37
Q

judicial precdent, cases for when practice statement was used for the first time in criminal law

A

shivpuri overruled anderton for impossible crimes

38
Q

j precdent, case 1 overruled case 2 for duress as a murder defence

A

case 1, howe

case2, lynch

39
Q

j precedent, case that set exceptions to coa’s own precedent

A

young

40
Q

j precdent, case for when two prev coa decisions conflict

A

tiverton estates ltd

41
Q

j precdent, case for when coa decision contradicts HOL decision

A

jones

42
Q

j precdent, coa decision was made per incuriam

A

rickards

43
Q

j precedent, criminal case where precedent was per incuriam

A

taylor

44
Q

j prededent, case where higher court is persuaded by lower court

A

r v r

45
Q

j precedent, case where jduge was persuaded by the judicial committee of the privy council decision

A

the wagon mound

46
Q

j precdent, case 1 followed obiter dictum of case 2 (criminal)

A

case 1, gotts

case 2, howe

47
Q

VL control test case

A

Hawley

48
Q

VL economic reality test case

A

ready mixed concrete LTD

49
Q

VL authorised wrongful acts case

A

poland

50
Q

VL acts that you re authorised to do in unauthorised way bus case

A

limpus

51
Q

VL acts authorised in unauthorised way milk man case

A

plenty

52
Q

VL pure carelessness case

A

Northern Ireland Transport Board

53
Q

VL case where bus drivers employers were not liable

A

beard

54
Q

VL frolic of his own death case

A

hilton

55
Q

VL case where employers were not liable for unauthorised lifts

A

twine

56
Q

VL close connection bouncer case

A

mattis

57
Q

VL catholic church case

A

Maga

58
Q

VL police rape case

A

N

59
Q

VL liability for independent contractors case

A

barclays bank

60
Q

DL case for bylaws

A

Boddington, smoking on a train fine had to be payed

61
Q

Dl procedural UV case

A

Aylesbury mushrooms, mushroom growers association was not consulted on new mushroom law

62
Q

DL case for substantive DL

A

R v Home secretary. fire brigade

63
Q

DL case for reasonableness

A

wednesbury

64
Q

DL case for unreasonable decision

A

Strickland

Law making (6 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions