ALL cards Flashcards
(170 cards)
resources available outlining recommendations for preventative health care:
formal publications, websites, digital apps
US preventative Services Task force (USPSTF)
American college of physicians (ACP)
CDC
uptodate, clinicalkey, accessmed, pubmed, etc.
Common grading criteria for preventative health recommendations in determining supportive evidence-based guidelines + clinical relevance
A: USPSTF recommends service; high certainty of net benefit
B: USPSTF recommends service; net benefit is moderate or moderate certainty that net benefit is moderate-substantial
C: USPSTF recommends selectively offering or providing service based on professional judgement and pt preferences; least moderate certainty benefit is small
D: USPSTF recommends against service (discourage use)
I: USPSTF concludes that current evidence is insufficient to asssess the balance of benefits and harms of service; lacking, of poor quality, or conflicting evidence`
What is grade for colorectal cancer screening?
A for 50-75 y/o
C for 76-85 y/o
Barriers relating to quality, access, and cost
Quality, access, and cost are issues that battle w/ eatchoter
if you wanna increase quality, youll have to decrease access and costs
if you wanna increase access, you’ll have to decrease cost and quality
Barriers to patient compliance when considering preventative health recs:
- diverse populations
- resources (financial, access, community education, gov’t)
- patient buy-in
significant preventative health guidelines standing out specific to children and adolescents
- vaccines/ vaccination schedules
- growth and develop’t
- safety
- illness prevention
- sexual health
- behavioral medicine
- suicide prevention
creating the guidelines via big data, public health research, and data analysis
guidelines associated w/ global health preventative medicine
- Global health initiatives (significant funds from multiple countries; US = most); ex. Rwanda- global fund has helped expansion of commmunity health insurance coverage; 1/3 = for upgrading healthcare infrastructure
- global funds contribute to: reducing mortality among peronsell, reducing incidence of infectious dzs through preventative interventions, limiting hospitalization rates, dz targeted programs
top cause of death in Kenya vs. US
Kenya: HIV/AIDS
US: heart dz; unintentional injuries is high for younger ages (25-44)
Components of a complete history and physical
history
ROS
physical exam
documentation (SOAP)
historical elements (besides the typical ones) that should be included in a complete history:
immunizations preventative health reproductive/sexual blood transfusions accidents childhood dzs cardiac risk advanced directives
in a comprehensive physical exam, look at:
lymph nodes
hair, skin, nails
breasts
other typical ones (EENT, CV, vasc, etc.)
Reasonable approach in obtaining history:
information gathering: health hx questionnaire (paper, electronic, web-based) and medical records
interview
physical exam
Cardinal techniques for use in physical exam:
inspection–> palpation–> percussion–> auscultation
equipment and other considerations necessary for comprehensive physical
medical equipment and room set up exam table set up comfy enverinment pt dressed/undressed timing patient positioning (standing, sitting, lying down) physician comfort + efficiency point of care documentation
Appropriate physician behavior related to profession and respectful communication
- communication and rapport
- relaxed, not hurried
- smooth and seamless
- establish expectations both from pt and for patient
- non-judgmental
- safe environment
- comfort
- safety
clinical reasoning and assessment towards making accurate decisions include:
Clinical reasoning: approach to content and context, data assimilation, intuitive determinations (clinical acumen + knowledge), and process identification (based on evidence, skill, experience)
use processes like pattern recognition, illness scripts, and science application
generating a clinical hypothesis:
- identify abnormal findings
- localize findings anatomically
- cluster clinical findings
- search for probable cause of findings
- generate hypotheses about pts presentation
- cluster the clinical data
- test the hypotheses and establish working dx or dxs
STEPS:
- select most specific and critical findings to support your hypothesis
- match findings against conditions that can produce them
- eliminate diagnostic possibilites that fail explain findings
- weight competing possibilities and select most likely dx
- give special attention to potentially life-threatening conditions (**include the worst case scenario in your differential!!)
methods ensuring quality patient data as result of comprehensive examination
make sure to have quality patient data! analyze mistakes and keep open mind
general documentation tips for a complete h&p
synthesize as you go, clinical reasoning starts in the first of the encounter, develop meaning and impact to your findings, dx is supported by findings, be concise + succint, assessment (impressions, dont list sign or symptoms)
put as much info as you can
what does the glasgow coma scale assess
level of consciousness
what are you testing in the glasgow coma scale and what is the scale?
eye opening - 1: none, 2: to pain, 3: to speech, 4: spontaneous
motor response - 1. none, 2. extension (decerebrate rigidity), 3. Flexor response (decorticate rigidity), 4. withdrawal, 5. Localized pain, 6. Obeys commands
verbal response - 1. none, 2. incomprehensible, 3. inappropriate (no sustained sentences), 4. confused (disoriented), 5. oriented
total: 3-15
what is the confusion assessment method (CAM)?
diagnostic algorithm for delirium
what will prove a diagnosis of delirium by CAM?
requires presence of features 1 + 2 and either 3 or 4:
1) acute onset or fluctuating course
2) inattention
3) disorganized thinking
4) altered level of consciousness
nuchal rigidity
pt unable to touch chin to chest either actively or passively
Dx: meningeal irritation